Skip to main content

Study of Postural Variation, Muscle Activity and Preferences of Monitor Placement in VDT Work

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICoRD'13

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1333 Accesses

Abstract

Various studies investigated sitting posture while working at VDT for muscle response, posture and preference, to deduce recommendations for design. The posture assumption is a dynamic activity and is often resulted out of continuous visual and physical feedback processed on cognitive level to maintain optimum comfort. The parameters that affect the work station design such as visual display terminal height directly affect the posture and comfort. This paper discusses the study of postural angles such as Head inclination, Trunk bending, Trunk inclination and sEMG muscle activity of Neck Extensors, Erector Spinae, Sternocleidomastoid and Upper Trapezius muscles when a Visual Display Terminal (VDT) user is working at a visual display terminal. The conditions were simulated on a test-rig which was developed on the basis of anthropometric data obtained. The experiment was performed on eight Indian male subjects and the VDT height was varied from 69.5 to 119.5 cm, monitor inclination was varied as 0, 30, 60°. Changes in the sitting postural angles was recorded using photogrammetry, simultaneously sEMG muscle activity of the defined muscles was recorded, also the preferred position of the VDT at each height as responded by the subjects was recorded including preferred VDT height. It was observed that the thoracic bending varied between 120 and 155° which increased with increasing VDT height. The trunk inclination with reference to horizontal varied from 96 to 65°. Similarly neck inclination was observed to change by a span of approximately 40°. The preferred monitor height was observed to be in the range of 89.5–99.5 cm. The Upper Trapezius and Sternocleidomastoid showed variation in muscle activity but not related to monitor height. The Erector Spinae and Neck extensors however responded to the variation in monitor height in exactly opposite pattern. It was observed that the point of intersection of the normalized sEMG ratio curves lies in the span of preferred VDT height responded by the subjects. The potential application of this research is in design of Sit down console, computer work stations/consoles with or without adjustability features in Indian context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Straker L, Mekhora K (2000) An evaluation of visual display unit placement by electromyography, posture, discomfort and preference. Ind Ergon 26(2000):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sommerich CM, Joines SM, Hermans V, Moon SD (2000) Use of surface electromyography to estimate neck and muscle activity. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 10(2000):377–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Villanueva M, Jonai H, Sotoyama M, Hisanaga N, Takeuchi Y, Saito S (1997) Sitting posture and neck and shoulder muscle activities at different screen height settings of the Visual display terminal. Ind Health 35(3):330–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hamilton N (1996) Source document position as it affects head position and neck muscle extension. Ergonomics 39(4):593–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Turville K, Psihogios J, Ulmer T, Mirka G (1998) The effect of video display terminal height on the operator: a comparison of the 15 deg and 40 deg recommendations. Appl Ergon 29(4):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar S (1994) A computer desk for bifocal lens wearers, with special emphasis on selected telecommunication tasks. Ergonomics 37(10):1669–1678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aaras A, Fostervold K, Ro O, Thoresen M (1997) Postural work load during VDU work: a comparison between various work postures. Ergonomics 40(11):1255–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsio H, Keyserling MW (1991) Evaluating posture behaviour during seated tasks. Ind Ergon 8:313–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. DeWall M, Reil V, Aghina J, Burdorf A, Snuders C (1992) Improving the sitting posture of CAD/CAM workers by increasing VDU monitor height. Ergonomics 35(4):427–436

    Google Scholar 

  10. Villanueva M, Sotoyama M, Jonai H, Takeuchi Y, Saito S (1996) Adjustments of posture and viewing parameters of the eye to the changes in screen height of the visual display terminal. Ergonomics 39:933–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Burgess-Limerick R, Plooy A, Fraser K, Ankrum DR (1999) The influence of computer monitor height on head and neck posture. Ind Ergon 23:171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mandal A (1981) The seated man (Homo Sedens). Appl Ergon 12(1):19–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujimaki G, Mitsuya R (2002) Study of the seated posture for VDT work. Displays 23:17–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ray G, Gupta N, Gupta S (2006) Experimental study to redesign visual display terminal work station for bifocal operators. J Sci Ind Res 65:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  15. Svensson H, Svensson O (2001) The influence of the viewing angle on neck-load during work with Video display units. J Rehab Med 33:133–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Babski-Reeves K, Stanfield J, Hughes L (2005) Assessment of video display workstation set up on risk factors associated with the development of low back and neck discomfort. Ind Ergon 35:593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajendra Patsute .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Patsute, R., Biswas, S.P., Rana, N., Ray, G. (2013). Study of Postural Variation, Muscle Activity and Preferences of Monitor Placement in VDT Work. In: Chakrabarti, A., Prakash, R. (eds) ICoRD'13. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1050-4_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, India

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1049-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1050-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics