Skip to main content

Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Multi-dimensional Governance

  • Chapter
Sustainable City Regions:

Part of the book series: cSUR-UT Series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration ((LSUR,volume 7))

Abstract

Human activity on earth and the increasing gregarious movement into cities are some of the most fascinating enterprises of mankind. This impact is difficult to measure, but (1971) and (2005) have defined it as a composite measure of population, affluence, technology and governance. Central to this equation is the long-term dimension of population impact and our ability to govern ourselves in order to minimize our impact on the planet. The sustainable development construct addresses intergenerational equity but also provides a framework to address city living and its regulatory milieu. Urban sustainability is now a major policy goal in many planning instruments and processes. Even though sustainable development means different things to different people, there is a consensus that sustainability is needed in order to achieve and maintain higher levels of economic prosperity, environmental quality and social responsiveness (Newman and Kenworthy (1999); (Berke (2002); (Gunder (2006).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arefi, M. (2003): “Revisiting the Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI)”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Arizona Growing Smarter Oversight Council (2006) Growing Smarter Guiding Principles 2006, http://www.azcommerce.com/CommAsst/GrowSmart/Guiding+Principles.htm (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Astleithner, F. and Hamedinger, A. (2003) “Urban sustainability as a new form of governance: obstacles and potentials in the case of Vienna, Innovation, 16(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • ASU (2004) Downtown Phoenix campus, http://www.asu.edu/cdp/dtn.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayre, G. and Callway, R. (eds) (2005) Governance for Sustainable Development, a Foundation for the Future. Earthscan

    Google Scholar 

  • Balsas, C. (2006) “The Phoenix Capitol Mall studios as examples of community embeddedness”, Open House International, 31(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke, P. (2002) “Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century”, Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, D. (1998) “The growth management challenge in Arizona”, in Melnick, R. (ed) Growth in Arizona, The Machine in the Garden. Morrison Institute for Public Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. and Chapman, J. (2001) Pieces of Power: Governance in Arizona. Arizona Town Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, E. and Kenney, E. (2005) “Building and Maintaining Urban Water Infrastructure: Phoenix, Arizona, 1950–2003”, Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 67

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Phoenix (2004) Transit Oriented Development TOD Guidelines—Phoenix, http://www.valleymetro.org/METRO_light_rail/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Phoenix (2006) Phoenix Infill Housing Program. http://phoenix.gov/BUSINESS/infilpgm.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collin, J., Leveillee, J. and Poitras, C. (2002) “New challenges and old solutions: Metropolitan reorganization in Canadian and US city-regions”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W. (2005) The Emerging Metropolis: Phoenix, 1944–1973, Arizona States Park Board

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. (2002) “The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the “governing without government” thesis”, Public Administration, 80(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, L. (2004) “Finding room for history in the desert: Can Tempe afford-or afford not to-keep its oldest house?”, The Next American City, February http://www.americancity.org/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, P. and Holdren, J. (1971) “Impact of population growth”, Science, 171

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser-Moleketi, G. (2003) “Quality governance for sustainable growth and development”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammage, G. (2003) Phoenix in Perspective-Reflections on Developing the Desert (2nd Edition). Herberger Center for Design Excellence and Arizona State University

    Google Scholar 

  • Gammage, G. and Fink, J. (2004) The Phoenix Experiment (Paper delivered at the conference “On the Edge: Metropolitan Growth and Western Environments” Stanford University, April 15–16)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. (2006) Metropolitan Phoenix: Place Making and Community Building in the Desert, University of Pennsylvania Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. and Burns, E. (2002) “The size and shape of Phoenix’s urban fringe”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon to cities: Tax lures must end. Arizona Republic, May 19, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Growing Smarter Commission (2000) Regional Planning Issues Technical Advisory Subcommittee Report and Recommendations, http://www.azplanning.org/commission.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grymm, N. and Redman, C. (2004) “Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: The case of central Arizona—Phoenix”, Urban Ecosystems, 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunder, M. (2006) “Sustainability, planning’s saving grace or road to perdition?”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2002) “Reconsidering the conection between capacity and governance”, Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. (2004) “Who will govern American metropolitan regions?”, in Phares, D. (ed) Metropolitan Governance Without Metropolitan Government? Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. and Melnick, R. (2004) “Regional roles, relationships and the future of the Phoenix metropolitan area”, in Phares, D. (ed) Metropolitan governance without metropolitan government? Ashgate

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, D., Miller, D. and Paytas, J. (2004) “Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions”, Urban Affairs Review, 40(2)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffernon, R. and Melnick, R. (2001) Growth management and open space protection in Arizona: Current tools and progress (Issues in Brief on behalf of Greater Phoenix Leadership) Morrison Institute for Public Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, C. (2001) “Leapfrogging, urban sprawl and growth management: Phoenix 1950–2000”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, B. (2006) Copper square and downtown Phoenix: The next great American downtown (Presentation made to the ULI Arizona District Council. August 30)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, A. (2006) “New urban governance processes on the level of neighborhoods”, European Planning Studies, 14(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidokoro, T. (2006) “An introduction to sustainable urban regeneration and local governance in regional cities” (Paper presented at the International workshop on Sustainable Urban Regeneration and Local Governance in Regional Cities. January 17–18)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, A. et al. (2006) “Examining the significance of housing enclaves in the metropolitan United States of America”, Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kress, A. (2005) “Phoenix mayor calls for opportunity corridor”, Phoenix Business Journal, March 18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafferty, W. (ed) (2004) Governance for Sustainable Development, a challenge of adapting form to function. Edward Elgar

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, R. (2006) The sun corridor: Arizona’s emerging megapolitan area (Presentation delivered at the Arizona Town Hall, Prescott. April 9, http://www.mi.vt.edu/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006))

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (2003) Phoenix: The Urban Desert, a documentary film Lincoln Institute of Land Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckingham, B. (1989) Phoenix: The History of a Southwestern Metropolis. The University of Arizona Press

    Google Scholar 

  • MAG (2000) Valley Vision 2025—Vision Report. Maricopa Association of Governments.

    Google Scholar 

  • MAG (2002) “MAG Regional Council endorses governance concepts”, MAGA-Zine, February

    Google Scholar 

  • MAG (2003) Regional Transportation Plan, http://www.mag.maricopa.gov/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • MAG (2005) Regional Report, A Resource for Policy Makers in the Maricopa Region. Phoenix Maricopa Association of Governments

    Google Scholar 

  • Maricopa County (2002) Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan—MC2020, http://www.maricopa.gov/planning/compln/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, B. (2006) “Privatizing urban services through homeowners associations: the potential and practice in Phoenix”, International Journal of Public Administration, 29(10–11)

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, A. and Ngoma, W. (2004) “Quality governance for sustainable development?”, Progress in Development Studies, 4(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison Institute for Public Policy (2000) Hits and Misses: Fast Growth in Metropolitan Phoenix. Morrison Institute for Public Policy

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya, S. (1998) “Growth management in Maricopa County, 1988–1992: An application of Kingdom’s agenda setting model”, The Social Science Journal, 35(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, P. (2000) “Urban governance for more sustainable cities”, European Environment, 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1999) Sustainability and cities. Island Press

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001) Cities for Citizens: improving metropolitan governance. OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, N. Johnson, C. and Hall, J. (1993) Citistates: how urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Seven Locks Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijawka, D., Blair, J., Guhathakurta, S. et al. (1998) “Environmental equity in central cities: Socioeconomic dimensions and planning strategies”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Portney, K. (2005) “Civic engagement and sustainable cities in the United States”, Public Administration Review, 65(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pursue a centennial dream (2005) Arizona Republic, December 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, R. et al. (2003) GP2100 Greater Phoenix Regional Atlas. ASU

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, R., Mathien, J. and Richert, D. (1997) Phoenix’s Strategic View of Growth, http://www.design.asu.edu./apa/proceedings97/quay2.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Redman, C. and Jones, N. (2005) “The environmental, social and health dimensions of urban expansion”, Population and Environment, 26(6)

    Google Scholar 

  • Regional Transportation Commission (2006) Examples of regional governance, http://www.psrtc.wa.gov/ (Accessed on December 20. 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. (1956) “A pure theory of local expenditures”, The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • ULI (2001) Light-rail transit in Phoenix, Arizona, economic development along the planned light-rail line, http://www.valleymetro.org/METRO_light_rail (Accessed on December 20, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yabes, R. and Pijawka, D. (2004) Public participation in achieving sustainability in central city neighborhoods (Paper presented at the IUPEA 2004 conference in Louisville)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Balsas, C. (2008). Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Multi-dimensional Governance. In: Kidokoro, T., Harata, N., Subanu, L.P., Jessen, J., Motte, A., Seltzer, E.P. (eds) Sustainable City Regions:. cSUR-UT Series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration, vol 7. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-78147-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics