Abstract
Human activity on earth and the increasing gregarious movement into cities are some of the most fascinating enterprises of mankind. This impact is difficult to measure, but (1971) and (2005) have defined it as a composite measure of population, affluence, technology and governance. Central to this equation is the long-term dimension of population impact and our ability to govern ourselves in order to minimize our impact on the planet. The sustainable development construct addresses intergenerational equity but also provides a framework to address city living and its regulatory milieu. Urban sustainability is now a major policy goal in many planning instruments and processes. Even though sustainable development means different things to different people, there is a consensus that sustainability is needed in order to achieve and maintain higher levels of economic prosperity, environmental quality and social responsiveness (Newman and Kenworthy (1999); (Berke (2002); (Gunder (2006).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arefi, M. (2003): “Revisiting the Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative (LANI)”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 22
Arizona Growing Smarter Oversight Council (2006) Growing Smarter Guiding Principles 2006, http://www.azcommerce.com/CommAsst/GrowSmart/Guiding+Principles.htm (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Astleithner, F. and Hamedinger, A. (2003) “Urban sustainability as a new form of governance: obstacles and potentials in the case of Vienna, Innovation, 16(1)
ASU (2004) Downtown Phoenix campus, http://www.asu.edu/cdp/dtn.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Ayre, G. and Callway, R. (eds) (2005) Governance for Sustainable Development, a Foundation for the Future. Earthscan
Balsas, C. (2006) “The Phoenix Capitol Mall studios as examples of community embeddedness”, Open House International, 31(3)
Berke, P. (2002) “Does sustainable development offer a new direction for planning? Challenges for the twenty-first century”, Journal of Planning Literature, 17(1)
Berman, D. (1998) “The growth management challenge in Arizona”, in Melnick, R. (ed) Growth in Arizona, The Machine in the Garden. Morrison Institute for Public Policy
Brown, B. and Chapman, J. (2001) Pieces of Power: Governance in Arizona. Arizona Town Hall
Burns, E. and Kenney, E. (2005) “Building and Maintaining Urban Water Infrastructure: Phoenix, Arizona, 1950–2003”, Yearbook of the Association of Pacific Coast Geographers, 67
City of Phoenix (2004) Transit Oriented Development TOD Guidelines—Phoenix, http://www.valleymetro.org/METRO_light_rail/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
City of Phoenix (2006) Phoenix Infill Housing Program. http://phoenix.gov/BUSINESS/infilpgm.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Collin, J., Leveillee, J. and Poitras, C. (2002) “New challenges and old solutions: Metropolitan reorganization in Canadian and US city-regions”, Journal of Urban Affairs, 24(3)
Collins, W. (2005) The Emerging Metropolis: Phoenix, 1944–1973, Arizona States Park Board
Davies, J. (2002) “The governance of urban regeneration: A critique of the “governing without government” thesis”, Public Administration, 80(2)
Davis, L. (2004) “Finding room for history in the desert: Can Tempe afford-or afford not to-keep its oldest house?”, The Next American City, February http://www.americancity.org/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Ehrlich, P. and Holdren, J. (1971) “Impact of population growth”, Science, 171
Fraser-Moleketi, G. (2003) “Quality governance for sustainable growth and development”, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 69(4)
Gammage, G. (2003) Phoenix in Perspective-Reflections on Developing the Desert (2nd Edition). Herberger Center for Design Excellence and Arizona State University
Gammage, G. and Fink, J. (2004) The Phoenix Experiment (Paper delivered at the conference “On the Edge: Metropolitan Growth and Western Environments” Stanford University, April 15–16)
Gober, P. (2006) Metropolitan Phoenix: Place Making and Community Building in the Desert, University of Pennsylvania Press
Gober, P. and Burns, E. (2002) “The size and shape of Phoenix’s urban fringe”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21
Gordon to cities: Tax lures must end. Arizona Republic, May 19, 2005.
Growing Smarter Commission (2000) Regional Planning Issues Technical Advisory Subcommittee Report and Recommendations, http://www.azplanning.org/commission.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Grymm, N. and Redman, C. (2004) “Approaches to the study of urban ecosystems: The case of central Arizona—Phoenix”, Urban Ecosystems, 7
Gunder, M. (2006) “Sustainability, planning’s saving grace or road to perdition?”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26
Hall, J. (2002) “Reconsidering the conection between capacity and governance”, Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 2
Hall, J. (2004) “Who will govern American metropolitan regions?”, in Phares, D. (ed) Metropolitan Governance Without Metropolitan Government? Ashgate
Hall, J. and Melnick, R. (2004) “Regional roles, relationships and the future of the Phoenix metropolitan area”, in Phares, D. (ed) Metropolitan governance without metropolitan government? Ashgate
Hamilton, D., Miller, D. and Paytas, J. (2004) “Exploring the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the governing of metropolitan regions”, Urban Affairs Review, 40(2)
Heffernon, R. and Melnick, R. (2001) Growth management and open space protection in Arizona: Current tools and progress (Issues in Brief on behalf of Greater Phoenix Leadership) Morrison Institute for Public Policy
Heim, C. (2001) “Leapfrogging, urban sprawl and growth management: Phoenix 1950–2000”, American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 60(1)
Kearney, B. (2006) Copper square and downtown Phoenix: The next great American downtown (Presentation made to the ULI Arizona District Council. August 30)
Keil, A. (2006) “New urban governance processes on the level of neighborhoods”, European Planning Studies, 14(3)
Kidokoro, T. (2006) “An introduction to sustainable urban regeneration and local governance in regional cities” (Paper presented at the International workshop on Sustainable Urban Regeneration and Local Governance in Regional Cities. January 17–18)
Kirby, A. et al. (2006) “Examining the significance of housing enclaves in the metropolitan United States of America”, Housing, Theory and Society, 23(1)
Kress, A. (2005) “Phoenix mayor calls for opportunity corridor”, Phoenix Business Journal, March 18
Lafferty, W. (ed) (2004) Governance for Sustainable Development, a challenge of adapting form to function. Edward Elgar
Lang, R. (2006) The sun corridor: Arizona’s emerging megapolitan area (Presentation delivered at the Arizona Town Hall, Prescott. April 9, http://www.mi.vt.edu/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006))
Lincoln Institute of Land Policy (2003) Phoenix: The Urban Desert, a documentary film Lincoln Institute of Land Policy
Luckingham, B. (1989) Phoenix: The History of a Southwestern Metropolis. The University of Arizona Press
MAG (2000) Valley Vision 2025—Vision Report. Maricopa Association of Governments.
MAG (2002) “MAG Regional Council endorses governance concepts”, MAGA-Zine, February
MAG (2003) Regional Transportation Plan, http://www.mag.maricopa.gov/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
MAG (2005) Regional Report, A Resource for Policy Makers in the Maricopa Region. Phoenix Maricopa Association of Governments
Maricopa County (2002) Maricopa County Comprehensive Plan—MC2020, http://www.maricopa.gov/planning/compln/ (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
McCabe, B. (2006) “Privatizing urban services through homeowners associations: the potential and practice in Phoenix”, International Journal of Public Administration, 29(10–11)
McLennan, A. and Ngoma, W. (2004) “Quality governance for sustainable development?”, Progress in Development Studies, 4(4)
Morrison Institute for Public Policy (2000) Hits and Misses: Fast Growth in Metropolitan Phoenix. Morrison Institute for Public Policy
Moya, S. (1998) “Growth management in Maricopa County, 1988–1992: An application of Kingdom’s agenda setting model”, The Social Science Journal, 35(4)
Murphy, P. (2000) “Urban governance for more sustainable cities”, European Environment, 10
Newman, P. and Kenworthy, J. (1999) Sustainability and cities. Island Press
OECD (2001) Cities for Citizens: improving metropolitan governance. OECD
Peirce, N. Johnson, C. and Hall, J. (1993) Citistates: how urban America can prosper in a competitive world. Seven Locks Press
Pijawka, D., Blair, J., Guhathakurta, S. et al. (1998) “Environmental equity in central cities: Socioeconomic dimensions and planning strategies”, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 18(5)
Portney, K. (2005) “Civic engagement and sustainable cities in the United States”, Public Administration Review, 65(5)
Pursue a centennial dream (2005) Arizona Republic, December 8
Quay, R. et al. (2003) GP2100 Greater Phoenix Regional Atlas. ASU
Quay, R., Mathien, J. and Richert, D. (1997) Phoenix’s Strategic View of Growth, http://www.design.asu.edu./apa/proceedings97/quay2.html (Accessed on December 20, 2006)
Redman, C. and Jones, N. (2005) “The environmental, social and health dimensions of urban expansion”, Population and Environment, 26(6)
Regional Transportation Commission (2006) Examples of regional governance, http://www.psrtc.wa.gov/ (Accessed on December 20. 2006)
Tiebout, C. (1956) “A pure theory of local expenditures”, The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5)
ULI (2001) Light-rail transit in Phoenix, Arizona, economic development along the planned light-rail line, http://www.valleymetro.org/METRO_light_rail (Accessed on December 20, 2006).
Yabes, R. and Pijawka, D. (2004) Public participation in achieving sustainability in central city neighborhoods (Paper presented at the IUPEA 2004 conference in Louisville)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Balsas, C. (2008). Sustainable Urban Regeneration in Phoenix, Arizona: Implications for Multi-dimensional Governance. In: Kidokoro, T., Harata, N., Subanu, L.P., Jessen, J., Motte, A., Seltzer, E.P. (eds) Sustainable City Regions:. cSUR-UT Series: Library for Sustainable Urban Regeneration, vol 7. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-78147-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-78147-9_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-78146-2
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-78147-9
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)