Skip to main content

Metamorphosis of Neocarzinostatin to SMANCS: Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, and Clinical Effect of the First Prototype Anticancer Polymer Therapeutic

  • Chapter
Neocarzinostatin

Summary

A polymer conjugated derivative of neocarzinostatin was prepared by cross-linking with two chains of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid half-butylate) (SMA) to neocarzinostatin (NCS), one at N-terminal alanine and the other at lysine 20. The conjugate was designated SMANCS. SMANCS exhibits a molecular weight of about 16000, and its oily formulation with Lipiodol (lipid contrast agent) became possible because of the hydrophobic property of SMA. When administered via the tumor-feeding artery, SMANCS in Lipiodol remained predominantly in tumor tissue: a concentration more than 2000 fold higher in the tumor than in the blood plasma. SMANCS showed increased stability in blood, and the immunogenecity was much lower than that of the parental NCS.

A predominant tumor-selective targeting mechanism was found not only for SMANCS administered intravenously as an aqueous formulation, but also was found later in many other macromolecular/polymer drugs as a common phenomenon if they were biocompatible. This mechanism is now called the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect of macromolecules and lipids. These macromolecules circulate much longer in the blood and permeate solid tumors. Most solid tumors have a high vascular density and are defective in their anatomical architecture. Further, solid tumors produce multiple types of vascular permeability factors (e.g., bradykinin, nitric oxide, vascular permeability factors) that facilitate the vascular permeability of macromolecules to tumor interstitium. In addition, there is much less efficient clearance of these macromolecules from a tumor by the lymphatic system, thus they remain in the tumor for a long time. SMANCS also was shown to accumulate effectively in normal lymph nodes, thus it is considered beneficial as an anti-lymphatic-metastatic agent. In vitro studies showed that SMANCS is more effectively internalized into tumor cells and cleaves DNA.

The unprecedented clinical effect of SMANCS for human hepatoma is now well established; SMANCS became an approved drug in 1993 in Japan. The survival rate of hepatoma can be improved with SMANCS beyond 5 years; otherwise these patients usually die within 6 months. If hepatoma patients have no liver cirrhosis or metastasis to other organs, and the tumor is confined within one segment, the chances of 5-year survival could be as high as 90%. Future applications of SMANCS/Lipiodol with ascertained clinical benefit include treatment of renal cell carcinoma via the renal artery, metastatic hepatoma via the hepatic artery, and pleural and ascitic carcinomatoses using intracavitary application. Treatment of tumors of the lung, stomach, pancreas, and gallbladder, as well as lymphoma and melanoma with SMANCS/Lipiodol shows promise and awaits further evaluation. Major side effects are mild fever (50%), which usually lasts for a few days, and dull pain (about 30%), which lasts for a half-hour. Leucocytosis and immunological activation are seen frequently and they are beneficial effects. Hematological suppression and toxicity to the liver and kidneys are not usually observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maeda H, Takeshita J, Yamashita A (1980) Lymphotropic accumulation of an antitumor antibiotic protein neocarzinostatin. Eur J Cancer 16: 723–731

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maeda H, Takeshita J, Kanamaru R (1979) A lipophilic derivative of neocarzinostatin: a polymer conjugation of an antitumor protein antibiotic. Int J Pept Protein Res 14: 81–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maeda H, Ueda M, Morinaga T, Matsumoto T (1985) Conjugation of poly(styreneco-maleic acid) derivatives to the antitumor protein neocarzinostatin: pronounced improvements in pharmacological properties. J Med Chem 28: 455–461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maeda H, Matsumoto T, Konno T, Iwai K, Ueda M (1984) Tailor-making of protein drugs by polymer conjugation for tumor targeting: a brief review on SMANCS. J Protein Chem 3: 181–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Takeshita J, Maeda H, Kanamaru R (1982) In vitro mode of action, pharmacokinetics, and organ specificity of poly(maleic acid-styrene)-conjugated neocarzinostatin, SMANCS. Gann 73: 278–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Maeda H, Takeshita.1, Kanamaru R, Sato H, Katoh J, Sato H (1979) Atimetastatic and antitumor activity of a derivative of neocarzinostatin: an organic solvent-and water-soluble polymer-conjugated protein. Gann 70: 601–606

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobayashi A, Oda T, Maeda H (1988) Protein binding of macromolecular anticancer agent SMANCS: characterization of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) derivatives as an albumin binding ligand. J Bioact Compat Polym 3: 319–333

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Maeda H (1979) Assay of proteolytic enzymes by fluorescence polarization technique. Anal Biochem 92: 222–227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda H (1978) Assay of an antitumor protein neocarzinostatin and its antibody by fluorescence polarization. Clin Chem 24: 2139–2144

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oda T, Morinaga T, Maeda H (1986) Stimulation of macrophages by polyanions and its conjugated proteins and effect on cell membrane. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 181: 9–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Takeshita J, Maeda H, Koike K (1980) Subcellular action of neocarzinostatin. Intracellular incorporation, DNA breakdown and cytotoxicity. J Biochem (Tokyo) 88: 1071–1080

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maeda H, Aikawa S, Yamashita A (1975) Subcellular fate of protein antibiotic neocarzinostatin in culture of a lymphoblastoid cell line from Burkitt’s lymphoma. Cancer Res 35: 554–559

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakamoto S, Maeda H, Ogata J (1979) An uptake of fluorescein isothiocyanatelabeled neocarzinostatin into the cancer and normal cells. Experientia (Basel) 35: 1233–1234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Maeda H, Matsumoto M (1979) Cytotoxic effect of neocarzinostatin on human lymphoid cells. Tohoku J Exp Med 128: 313–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oda T, Maeda H (1987) Binding to and internalization by cultured cells of neocarzinostatin and enhancement of its action by conjugation with lipophilic styrenemaleic acid copolymer. Cancer Res 47: 3206–3211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oda T, Sato F, Maeda H (1987) Facilitated internalization of neocarzinostatin and its lipophilic polymer conjugate, SMANCS, into cytosol in acidic pH. J Natl Cancer Inst 79: 1205–1211

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oka K, Miyamoto Y, Matsumura Y, Tanaka S, Suzuki F, Maeda H (1990) Enhanced intestinal absorption of a hydrophobic polymer-conjugated protein drug, smancs, in a oily formulation. Pharm Res (NY) 7: 852–855

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46: 6387–6392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maeda H (1991) SMANCS and polymer-conjugated macromolecular drugs: advantages in cancer chemotherapy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 6: 181–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Maeda H, Matsumura Y (1989) Tumoritropic and lymphotropic principle of macromolecular drug. Crit Rev Ther Drug Carrier Syst 6: 193–210

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hirayama S, Sato F, Oda T, Maeda H (1986) Stability of high molecular weight anticancer agent SMANCS and its transfer from oil-phase to water-phase. Jpn J Antibiot 39: 815–822

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Maeda H (1994) Polymer conjugated macromolecular drugs for tumor specific targeting. In: Domb AJ (ed) Polymeric site-specific pharmacology. Wiley, New York, pp 95–116

    Google Scholar 

  23. Konno T, Maeda H, Iwai K, Tashiro S, Maki S, Morinaga T, Mochinaga M, Hiraoka T, Yokoyama I (1983) Effect of arterial administration of high-molecular-weight anticancer agent SMANCS with lipid lymphographie agent on hepatoma: a preliminary report. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 19: 1053–1065

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Kimoto A, Konno T, Kawaguchi T, Miyauchi Y, Maeda H (1992) Antitumor effect of SMANCS on rat mammary tumor induced by 7, 12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene. Cancer Res 52: 1013–1017

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Iwai K, Maeda H, Konno T (1984) Use of oily contrast medium for selective drug targeting to tumor: enhanced therapeutic effect and X-rav image. Cancer Res 44: 2115–2121

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iwai K, Maeda H, Konno T, Matsumura Y, Yamashita R, Yamasaki K, Hiravama S, Miyauchi Y (1987) Tumor targeting by arterial administration of lipid: rabbit model with VX2 carcinoma in the liver. Anticancer Res 7: 321–328

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maeda H (1986) SMANCS (in Japanese). Zusetsu-Rinsho [Gann] series (Prog Cancer Clin). 1: 132–137

    Google Scholar 

  28. Konno T, Maeda H, Iwai K, Maki S, Tashiro S, Uchida M, Miyauchi Y (1984) Selective targeting of anti-cancer drug and simultaneous image enhancement in solid tumors by arterially administered lipid contrast medium. Cancer (Phila) 54: 2367–2374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yamasaki K. Konno T, Miyauchi Y, Maeda H (1987) Reduction of hepatic metastases in rabbits by administration of an oily anticancer agent into the protal vein. Cancer Res 47: 852–855

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ohtsuka N, Konno T, Miyauchi Y, Maeda H (1987) Anticancer effects of arterial administration of the anticancer agent SMANCS with Lipiodol on metastatic lymph nodes. Cancer (Phila) 59: 1560–1565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Li CJ, Miyamoto Y, Kojima Y, Maeda H (1993) Augmentation of tumor delivery of macromolecular drugs with reduced bone marrow delivery by elevating blood pressure. Br J Cancer 67: 975–980

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Konno T (1990) Targeting cancer chemotherapeutic agents by use of Lipiodol contrast medium. Cancer (Phila) 66: 1897–1903

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Konno T, Maeda H (1987) Targeting chemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Okuda K, Ishak KG (eds) Neoplasms of the liver. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 343–352

    Google Scholar 

  34. Maki S, Konno T, Maeda H (1985) Image enhancement in computerized tomography for sensitive diagnosis of liver cancer and semiquantitation of tumor selective drug targeting with oily contrast medium. Cancer (Phila) 56: 751–757

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Noda S, Konno S, Tanaka J, Yamada M, Yoshitake N (1990) Treatment of renal cell carcinoma with intra-arterial administration of SMANCS dissolved in Lipiodol. Anticancer Res 10: 709–716

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kobayashi M, Imai K, Sugihara S, Maeda H, Konno T, Yamanaka H (1991) Tumor-targeted chemotherapy with lipid contrast medium and macromolecular anticancer drug (SMANCS) for renal cancer. Urology 37: 288–294

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kimura M, Konno “l’, Oda Maeda H, Miyauchi Y (1993) Intracavitary treatment of malignant ascitic carcinomatosis with oily anticancer agents in rat. Anticancer Res 13: 1287–1292

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kimura M, Konno T, Yamashita R, Oda T, Nagamitsu A (!994) Intracavital chemotherapy for peritoneal and pleural carcinomatosis with lipid-formulated anticancer agents. Oncol Rep 1: 313–315

    Google Scholar 

  39. Maeda H, Miyamoto Y (1994) SMANCS approach—oily formulations of protein drugs for arterial injection and oral administration. In: de Boer AG (ed) Drug absorption enhancement. concept, possibilities, limitations and trends. Harwood Academic, Chur. pp 221–247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Japan

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maeda, H., Konno, T. (1997). Metamorphosis of Neocarzinostatin to SMANCS: Chemistry, Biology, Pharmacology, and Clinical Effect of the First Prototype Anticancer Polymer Therapeutic. In: Maeda, H., Edo, K., Ishida, N. (eds) Neocarzinostatin. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66914-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-66914-2_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo

  • Print ISBN: 978-4-431-66916-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-4-431-66914-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics