Abstract
Collaboration is the central issue of emergency response. Using a method of comparative case studies, this paper demonstrates the evolution of collaboration in emergency response in China from the Wenchuan Earthquake in 2008 to the Lushan Earthquake in 2013. In the intersectoral dimension, collaboration between governments and nonprofit organizations has been significantly improved. In the intergovernmental dimension, more reliance on local agencies has been observed only in response. In the interagency dimension, no progress has been made to the collaboration between the newly established Chinese Comprehensive Emergency Management system and the conventional typed-based disaster management system. To improve collaboration in emergency response in China in the future, this paper suggests that an inclusive framework for intersectoral collaboration should be developed. At the same time, assigning more responsibilities to local governments is critical for rebalancing external assistance and local reliance in the periods before, during, and after a disaster. Finally, a unified command and coordination structure for interagency collaboration is urgently required.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ansell C, Boin A, Keller A (2010) Managing transboundary crises: identifying the building blocks of an effective response system. J Contingencies Crisis Manag 18(4):195–207
Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, London
Beijing Times (2011) There are three million illegal nonprofit organizations and three categories of them are able to register legally. http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1026/15119105.html. Accessed 11 July 2011
Chen J, Zhu J (2009) From SARS to Wenchuan Earthquake: Chinese civil society response to disaster. In: Proceedings of the 4th Cross-strait Forum on disaster and public management. Nanjing University, Center of Management of Social Risk and Public Crisis, Nanjing
Comfort LK (1999) Shared risk: complex systems in seismic response. Pergamon, New York
Comfort LK (2002) Rethinking security: organizational fragility in extreme events. Public Adm Rev 62(s1):98–107
Comfort LK (2007) Crisis management in hindsight: cognition, communication, coordination, and control. Public Adm Rev 67(Special Issue): 189–197
Comfort LK, Okada A, Ertan G (2013) Networks of action in catastrophic events: the 11 March Tohoku-Oki disasters. Earthq Spectra 29(s1):387–402
Drabek TE, McEntire DA (2003) Emergent phenomena and the sociology of disaster: lessons, trends and opportunities from the research literature. Disaster Prev Manag 12(2):97–112
Dynes RR (1970) Organized behavior in disaster. Health Lexington Books, Lexington
FEMA (2012) National response framework. Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/national-response-framework
FEMA (2013) National incident management system. Federal Emergency Management Agency. http://www.fema.gov/national-incident-management-system
Gharajedaghi J (2011) System thinking: managing chaos and complexity: a platform for designing business architecture, 3rd edn. Elsevier, Massachusetts
Howitt A, Leonard HB, Giles D (2009) Managing crises: response to large-scale emergencies. CQ Press, Washington, DC
Huang Y (2013) Establishment of the first governmental social service platform. Beijing Times. http://epaper.jinghua.cn/html/2013-05/27/content_1992449.htm. Accessed 27 May 2013
Jaeger PT et al (2007) Community response grids: e-government, social networks, and effective emergency management. Telecomm Pol 31(10):592–604
Kapucu N (2006) Interagency communication network during emergencies: boundary spanners in multi-agency coordination. Am Rev Publ Admin 36(2):207–225
Kapucu N (2009) Interorganizational coordination in complex environments of disasters: the evolution of intergovernmental disaster response system. J Homeland Secur Emerg Manag 6(1):1–26
Kendra J, Wachtendorf T, Quarantelli EL (2003) The evacuation of Lower Manhattan by water transport on September 11: an unplanned “success”. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 29(6):316–318
Kreps GA, Bosworth SL (1994) Organizing, role enactment, and disaster: a structural theory. Associated University Presses, New Jersey
Morton JF (2012) Next generation homeland security: network federalism and the course to national preparedness. Naval Institute Press, Annapolis
Moynihan DP (2009) The network governance of crisis response: case studies of Incident Command System. J Publ Admin Res Theor 19(4):895–915
National Research Council (2006) Facing hazards and disasters: understanding human dimensions. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC
OECD (2003) Emerging risks in the 21st century: an agenda for action. OECD Press Service, Paris
State Council of the PRC (2008) Post-Wenchuan Earthquake restoration and reconstruction master plan. [2008] 31. State Council General Office, Beijing
State Council of the PRC (2009) White paper on China’s disaster reduction action. State Council of the PRC, Beijing
t’ Hart P (2013) After Fukushima: reflections on risks and institutional learning in an era of mega-crises. Publ Admin 91(1):101–113
Tierney K, Trainor J (2003) Networks and resilience in the World Trade Center disaster. DRC working paper
U.S. House of Representatives (2006) A failure of initiative: final report of the selected bipartisan committee to investigate the preparation for and response to Hurricane Katrina. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
Wachtendrof T (2005) Improvising disaster in the city of Jazz: organizational response to Hurricane Katrina. http://forums.ssrc.org/understandingkatrina/improvising-disaster-in-the-city-of-jazz-organizational-response-to-hurricane-katrina/
Waugh W, Streib G (2006) Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public Adm Rev 66(Special Issue):131–140
Xinhuanet (2008) News: the direct economic loss of the Wenchuan Earthquake reached to 845.1 Billion RMB. http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2008-09/04/content_9768363.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2008
Xinhuanet (2013a) The Lushan Earthquake has caused 196 deaths, 21 missing and 11, 470 Injuries. http://www.sc.xinhuanet.com/content/2013-04/24/c_115528235.htm. Accessed 24 Apr 2013
Xinhuanet (2013b) Li Keqiang’s requirement for new disaster relief system and demonstrates the desire of government reform. http://news.xinhuanet.com/fortune/2013-11/06/c_125662242.htm. Accessed 6 Nov 2013
Yang G (2008) A civil society emerges from the earthquake rubble. New Perspect Q 25(3):39–42
Zhang H (2012) What China has learnt from disasters: evolution of the emergency management system after SARS, Southern Snowstorm, and Wenchuan Earthquake. J Comp Pol Anal 13(3):234–244
Zhang H (2013) Organization response network of the Lushan Earthquake on April 20, 2013, Working Paper. Disaster Management Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh
Zhang H, Tong X (2009) An analytical framework of governmental emergency capacity assessment. Chin Publ Admin 286(4):32–36
Zhang Q, Qibin L, Zhang X (2011) An outlook on Chinese model of emergency management based upon the review of Wenchuan Earthquake response: an interactive perspective of strong state and strong society. Chin Publ Admin 2011(5):50–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Japan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zhang, H. (2015). Collaboration in Emergency Response in China: Evolution from the Wenchuan Earthquake, May 12, 2008 to the Lushan Earthquake, April 20, 2013. In: Brassard, C., Howitt, A., Giles, D. (eds) Natural Disaster Management in the Asia-Pacific. Disaster Risk Reduction. Springer, Tokyo. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55157-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55157-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Tokyo
Print ISBN: 978-4-431-55156-0
Online ISBN: 978-4-431-55157-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)