Skip to main content

Agent Oriented Software Engineering

  • Chapter
Issues in Multi-Agent Systems

Abstract

Research in Agent Oriented Software Engineering involves the integration of different disciplines, from software engineering to artificial intelligence. To demonstrate the breadth of the field, this chapter discusses a number of the research issues involved. The issues range from the definition of a framework for evaluation of agent-oriented methodologies to the integration of other software engineering practices such as the use of software components or the Model Driven Engineering approach. The works discussed involve various activities of the software life cycle: test, verification and validation of multi-agent systems, the application of multi-agent systems for software maintenance and practical multi-agent systems proposals for specific domains, such as the development of multi-agent systems applying the System Product Lines philosophy and the definition of a method based on agent-oriented methodologies for the development of Holonic Manufacturing Systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. M. Alberti, M. Gavanelli, E. Lamma, P. Mello, and P. Torroni. Specification and verification of agent interaction using social integrity constraints. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, 85(2), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. N. Anquetil, K. M. de Oliveira, K. D. de Sousa, and M. G. Batista Dias. Software maintenance seen as a knowledge management issue. Information and Software Technology, page In press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Aurum, R. Jeffery, C. Wohlin, and M. Handzic, editors. Managing Software Engineering Knowledge. Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birkhäuser Basel, editor. The Agent Modeling Language — AML. Springer-verlag, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  5. C. Bernon, M. Cossentino, and J. Pavón. Agent-oriented software engineering. Knowl. Eng. Rev., 20(2):99–116, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Bernon, M. Cossentino, and J. Pavón. Agent-oriented software engineering. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 20(02):99–116, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. Bernon, M. P. Gleizes, S. Peyruqueou, and G. Picard. Adelfe: A methodology for adaptive multi-agent systems engineering. In P. Petta, R. Tolksdorf, and F. Zambonelli, editors, ESAW, volume 2577 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 156–169. Springer, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Botía, J. M. Hernansáez, and A. F. Gómez-Skarmeta. Towards an approach for debugging mas through the analysis of acl messages. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 20, July 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. Bresciani, A. Perini, P. Giorgini, F. Giunchiglia, and J. Mylopoulos. Tropos: an agent-oriented software development methodology. Journal of Autonomous agents and Multiagent Systems, 8(3), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Caire, G.and Coulier, F. J. Garijo, J. J. Gómez-Sánz, J. Pavón, F. Leal, P. Chainho, P. E. Kearney, J. Stark, R. Evans, and P. Massonet. Agent oriented analysis using message/uml. In Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II, volume 2222 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 119–135. Springer, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. N. Chapin. The job of software maintenance. In Proc. of the Conf. on Software Maintenance-1987, pages 4–12. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Chien, R. Sherwood, G. Rabideau, R. Castano, A. Davies, M. Burl, R. Knight, T. Stough, J. Roden, P. Zetocha, R. Wainwright, P. Klupar, J. Van Gaasbeck, P. Cappelaere, and D. Oswald. The techsat-21 autonomous space science agent. In AAMAS’ 02: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 570–577, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. P. Clements and L. Northrop. Software Product Lines: Practices and Patterns. SEI Series in Software Engineering. Addison-Wesley, August 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Massimo Cossentino. Agent Oriented Methodologies, chapter From Requirements to Code with the PASSI Methodology, pages 79–106. Idea Group, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Cuesta, A. Gómez, J. C. Gonzalez-Moreno, and F. J. Rodriguez. A framework for evaluation of agent oriented methodologies. Technical report, Universidade de Vigo, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Czarnecki and U. Eisenecker. Generative Programming: Methods, Tools, and Applications. Addison-Wesley, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  17. K. H. Dam and M. Winikoff. Comparing agent-oriented methodologies. In Agent-Oriented Information Systems: AOIS, pages 78–93, Berlin / Heidelberg, 2003. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. M. Dastani, John-J. Ch. Meyer, and R. H. Bordini. 06261 abstracts collection: Foundations and practice of programming multi-agent systems. In Rafael H. Bordini, Mehdi Dastani, and John-Jules Ch. Meyer, editors, Foundations and Practice of Programming Multi-Agent Systems, number 06261 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Internationales Begegnungs-und Forschungszentrum fuer Informatik (IBFI), Schloss Dagstuhl, Germany, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. T. H. Davenport and L. Prusak. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What they Know. Harvard Business School Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  20. T. De Wolf and T. Holvoet. Towards a methodology for engineering self-organising emergent systems. Self-Organization and Autonomic Informatics, 135:18–34, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  21. J. Dehlinger and R. R. Lutz. A product-line requirements approach to safe reuse in multi-agent systems. In SELMAS’ 05: Proceedings of the fourth international workshop on Software engineering for large-scale multi-agent systems, pages 1–7, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Dehlinger and R. R. Lutz. Bi-directional safety analysis for product-line, multiagent systems. SIGBED Review: Special Issues on Workshop on Innovative Techniques for Certification of Embedded Systems, 3(4), 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J. Dehlinger and R. R. Lutz. A product-line approach to promote asset reuse in multi-agent systems. In A. F. Garcia, R. Choren, C. J. Pereira de Lucena, P. Giorgini, T. Holvoet, and A. B. Romanovsky, editors, Software Engineering for Multi-Agent Systems IV, Research Issues and Practical Applications, volume 3914 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 161–178. Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. A. DeLoach. Multiagent systems engineering of organization-based multiagent systems. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 30(4):1–7, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. DeLoach and M. Wood. Developing multiagent systems with agenttool. In C. Castelfranchi and Y. Lesperance, editors, Intelligent Agents VII. Agent Theories Architectures and Languages, 7th International Workshop (ATAL 2000), volume 1986 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer-Verlag, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Demazeau. From interactions to collective behaviour in agent-based systems. In Proceedings of the 1st. European Conference on Cognitive Science, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Girardi. Reuse in agent-based application development. In First International Workshop on Software Engineering for Large-Scale Multi-Agent Systems, pages 1–7, Orlando, FL, USA, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Giret and V. Botti. Holons and Agents. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 15:645–659, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A. Giret and V. Botti. Multiagent System Technologies, chapter On the definition of meta-models for analysis of large-scale MAS, pages 273–286. LNAI 3187, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  30. A. Giret and V. Botti. Towards an Abstract Recursive Agent. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 11(2):165–177, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. Giret and V. Botti. From system requirements to holonic manufacturing system analysis. International Journal of Production Research, 44:3917–3928, 2006.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. J. J. Gómez-Sánz. Modelado de Sistemas Multi-Agente. PhD thesis, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  33. J. J. Gómez-Sánz and J. Pavón. IDK MANUAL, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Z. Guessoum, M. Cossentino, and J. Pavón. Methodologies and Software Engineering for Agent Systems, chapter Roadmap of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pages 431–451. Kluwer, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H. Hara, S. Fujita, and K. Sugawara. Reusable software components based on an agent model. In ICPADS’ 00: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems: Workshops, page 447, Washington, DC, USA, 2000. IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

  36. K. Havelund, M. Lowry, and J. Penix. Formal analysis of a space-craft controller using spin. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 27(8):749–765, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. I. Hawryszkiewycz, B. Henderson-Sellers, and Quynh-Nhu Numi Tran. Fragments for composing collaborative systems. In ISTA, pages 95–106, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  38. B. Henderson-Sellers and P. Giorgini. Agent-Oriented Methodologies. Idea Group Inc., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Press Release HMS. HMS Requirements. HMS Server, http://hms.ifw.unihannover.de/, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Marc-Philippe Huget. Agent uml notation for multiagent system design. IEEE Internet Computing, 8(4):63–71, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. A. Jansen, R. Smedinga, J. Gurp, and J. Bosch. First class feature abstractions for product derivation. IEE Proceedings — Software, 151(4):187–198, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. D. Jensen and V. Lesser. Social pathologies of adaptive agents. Safe Learning Agents: Papers from the 2002 AAAI Spring Symposium, TR SS-02-07, August 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  43. V. Julian and V. Botti. Developing real-time multiagent systems. Integrated Computer-Aided Engineering, 11:135–149, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  44. D. Kinny, M. Georgeff, and A. Rao. A methodology and modelling technique for systems of BDI agents. In Walter Van de Velde and John W. Perram, editors, Agents Breaking Away: Proceedings of the Seventh European Workshop on Modelling Autonomous Agents in a Multi-Agent World, volume 1038 of Lecture Notes in Computer-Science, pages 56–71. Springer, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  45. A. Koestler. The Ghost in the Machine. Arkana Books, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  46. D. S. Kolovos, R. F. Paige, and F. Polack. The epsilon object language (eol). In Rensink and Warmer [69], pages 128–142.

    Google Scholar 

  47. D. N. Lam and K. S. Barber. Comprehending agent software. In AAMAS’ 05: Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pages 586–593, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Lindvall and I. Rus. Managing Software Engineering Knowledge, chapter Knowledge Management for Software Organizations, pages 73–94. Springer, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  49. M. Luck and P. McBurney. Challenges for Agent Technology Moving towards 2010. Upgrade, V(4), 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  50. D. C. McFarlane and S. Bussmann. Agent-Based Manufacturing. Advances in the Holonic Approach, chapter Holonic Manufacturing Control: Rationales, Developments and Open Issues, pages 301–326. Springer-Verlag, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  51. J. Mylopoulos, M. Kolp, and J. Castro. Uml for agent-oriented software development: The tropos proposal. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2185:422–441, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. A. J. Offutt and A. Abdurazik. Generating tests from uml specifications. In R. B. France and B. Rumpe, editors, UML, volume 1723 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 416–429. Springer, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  53. OMG. Mda foundation model, http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?ormsc/05-04-01, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  54. L. Padgham, J. Thangarajah, and M. Winikoff. Tool support for agent development using the prometheus methodology. In Fifth International Conference on Quality Software (QSIC 2005), pages 383–388. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  55. L. Padgham and M. Winikoff. Prometheus: A Practical Agent-Oriented Methodology, chapter Chapter 5 in Agent-Oriented Methodologies, pages 107–135. Idea Group, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  56. J. Pavón and J. J. Gómez-Sánz. Agent Oriented Software Engineering with INGENIAS. 3rd International Central and Eastern European Conference on Multi-Agent Systems (CEEMAS 2003): V. Marik, J. Müller, M. Pechoucek:Multi-Agent Systems and Applications II, LNAI 2691, pages 394–403, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  57. J. Pavon, J. J. Gómez-Sánz, and R. Fuentes. Agent-Oriented Methodologies, chapter The INGENIAS Methodology and Tools, pages 236–276. Idea Group Publishing, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  58. J. Pavón, J. J. Gómez-Sánz, and R. Fuentes. Model driven development of multiagent systems. In Rensink and Warmer [69], pages 284–298.

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. Peña. On Improving The Modelling Of Complex Acquaintance Organisations Of Agents. A Method Fragment For The Analysis Phase. PhD thesis, University of Seville, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  60. J. Peña and M. G. Hinchey. Multiagent system product lines: Challenges and benefits. Communications of the ACM, 49(12), December 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  61. J. Pefia, M. G. Hinchey, M. Resinas, R. Sterritt, and J. L. Rash. Designing and managing evolving systems using a mas-product-line approach. Journal of Science of Computer Programming, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  62. J. Pefia, M. G. Hinchey, A. Ruiz-Cortés, and P. Trinidad. Building the core architecture of a nasa multiagent system product line. In 7th International Workshop on Agent Oriented Software Engineering 2006, volume 4405, pages 208–224, Hakodate, Japan, May, 2006. LNCS.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. Peña, M. G. Hinchey, R. Sterritt, A. Ruiz-Cortés, and M. Resinas. A model-driven architecture approach for modeling, specifying and deploying policies in autonomous and autonomic systems. In Second International Symposium on Dependable Autonomic and Secure Computing (DASC 2006), 29 September–1 October 2006, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, pages 19–30. IEEE Computer Society, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  64. K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. van der Linden. Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Springer, September 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  65. M. Polo, M. Piattini, and F. Ruiz, editors. Advances in Software Maintenance Management: Technologies and Solutions. Idea Group Inc., 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  66. M. Polo, M. Piattini, F. Ruiz, and C. Calero. Roles in the maintenance process. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, 24(4):84–86, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. D. Poutakidis, L. Padgham, and M. Winikoff. Debugging multi-agent systems using design artifacts: The case of interaction protocols. In AAMAS’02, Bologna, Italy, July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  68. A. S. Rao and M. P. Georgeff. BDI-agents: from theory to practice. In Proceedings of the First Intl. Conference on Multiagent Systems, San Francisco, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  69. A. Rensink and J. Warmer, editors. Model Driven Architecture — Foundations and Applications, Second European Conference, ECMDA-FA 2006, Bilbao, Spain, July 10–13, 2006, Proceedings, volume 4066 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  70. O. M. Rodriguez, A. I. Martínez, J. Favela, A. Vizcaíno, and M. Piattini. Understanding and supporting knowledge flows in a community of software developers. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 3198:52–66, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  71. A. Sabas, M. Badri, and S. Delisle. A comparative analysis of multiagent system development: Towards a unified approach. In Proceedings of Third Interanational Symposium “From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation” AT2AI-3, pages 624–631, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  72. D. C. Schmidt. Model Driven Engineering. IEEE Computer, 39(2):25–31, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  73. C. Seaman. The information gathering strategies of software maintainers. In Proc. of the Intl. Conf. on Software Maintenance (ICSM’2002), pages 141–149. IEEE Computer Society Press, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  74. B. Selic. The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Software, 20(5):19–25, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. O. Shehory and A. Sturm. Evaluation of modeling techniques for agent-based systems. In AGENTS’ 01: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents, pages 624–631, New York, NY, USA, 2001. ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  76. W. Shen and D. H. Norrie. Agent-Based Systems for Intelligent Manufacturing: A State-of-the-Art Survey. Knowledge and Information Systems, an Internatinal Journal, 1(2):129–156, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Y. Smaragdakis and D. Batory. Mixin layers: an object-oriented implementation technique for refinements and collaboration-based designs. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol., 11(2):215–255, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. J. Sudeikat, L. Braubach, A. Pokahr, W. Lamersdorf, and W. Renz. On the validation of belief-desire-intention agents. In R. Bordini, M. Dastani, J. Dix, and A. El Fallah, editors, Programming Multi-Agent Systems Workshop at AAMAS 2006, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  79. H. Van Brussel, J. Wyns, P. Valckenaers, L. Bongaerts, and P. Peeters. Reference Architecture for Holonic Manufacturing Systems: PROSA. Computers In Industry, 37:255–274, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. L. van Elst, V. Dignum, and A. Abecker. Towards agent-mediated knowledge management. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2926:1–30, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  81. D. M. Weiss and C. T. R. Lai. Software Product-Line Engineering. Addison Wesley, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  82. F. Zambonelli, N. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Developing multiagent systems: the GAIA methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 12(3):317–370, July 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  83. F. Zambonelli, N. R. Jennings, and M. Wooldridge. Developing multiagent systems: The Gaia methodology. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM), 12(3):317–370, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cuesta, P., Gómez, A., González, J.C. (2007). Agent Oriented Software Engineering. In: Moreno, A., Pavón, J. (eds) Issues in Multi-Agent Systems. Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies and Autonomic Computing. Birkhäuser Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8543-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7643-8543-9_1

  • Publisher Name: Birkhäuser Basel

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7643-8542-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7643-8543-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics