Skip to main content

Efficiency of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)-Score for the Long-Term Follow-Up after Severe Brain Injuries

  • Conference paper
Intracranial Pressure and Neuromonitoring in Brain Injury

Part of the book series: Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements ((NEUROCHIRURGICA,volume 71))

Summary

The Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)-Score is the most widely used instrument for measuring outcome in head injury research. Its reliability is seen controversial because of its simplicity. The study analyzes the correlation between the levels 3 to 5 of recovery to medical data, psychology and quality of life (QOL) 4 to 8 years after the accident. 34 patients, suffered from a severe brain injury (BI) 4 to 8 years ago, were reexamined by a psychological test battery and by evaluating of QOL (using self developed items for private and social activity). Test results and GOS-Scores additionally were correlated to data from the phase of intensive care.

Patients, still alive 4 to 8 years after injury, ranged mainly between the GOS-Scores 3 to 5 of recovery. Consequently, other scores (like Ranchos los Amigos. Barthel Index, GOAT) failed in measuring the outcome after such a long time. Different parameters from the phase of intensive care correlate significantly with the patients GOS-Score: coma length, isolated brain injury versus additional extracranial injury, compression of the basal cisternes on the initial CCT. Different psychological test results and the patients quality of life correlate significantly with the GOS-Scores from 3–5. These correlations could be shown in xy and yx-direction by different mathematical models.

It is concluded, that GOS-levels 3–5 of recovery correlate to the essential medical data from the initial phase after the accident and to a detailed psychological evaluation years after injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athippan S, Muthukumar N, Srinivasan S (1993) Influence of basal cisterens, midline shift and pathology on outcome in head injuries. Ann Acad Med 22: 452–455

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bowers SA, Marshall SF (1980) Outcome in 200 consecutive cases of severe head injury treated in San Diego County. A prospective analysis. Neurosurgery 3: 237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce DA, Langfitt TW (1978) Resuscitation from coma due to head injury. Crit Care Med 7: 254–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Couldwell WT, Fukushima T, Glanotta SL, Weiss MH (1996) Psychosocial functioning and quality of life in patients with primary brain tumors. J Neurosurg 84: 29–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dongen KJ, Braakmann R, Gelpke GJ (1983) The prognostic value of computerized tomography in comatose head-injured patients. J Neurosurg 59: 951–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Formisano R, Schmidhuber-Eiler B, Salturi L, Cigany E, Birbamer G, Gerstenbrand F (1991) Neuropsychological outcome after traumatic temporal lobe damage. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 109: 1–4

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frowein RA, Firsching R (1988) Personality after head injury. Acta Neurochir 44 (Wien) [Suppl]: 70–73

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Godersky JC, Gentry LR, Tranel D, Dyste GN, Danks KR (1990) Magnetic resonance imaging and neurobehavioral outcome in traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 51: 311–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall KM, Karzmark P, Stevens M, Englander J, O’Hare P, Wright J (1994) Family stressors in traumatic brain injury: a two-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 75: 876–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jenett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage-a pratical scale, Lancet i: 480–484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lezak DL (1983) Neuropsychological assessment, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, NewYork

    Google Scholar 

  12. McLean A, Dikmen SS, Temkin NR (1993) Psychosocial recovery after head injury. Arch Phys med Rehabil 74: 1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Reider-Groswasser I, Cohen M, Groswasser Z (1993) Late CT findings in brain trauma: relationship to cognitive and behavioral sequelae and to vocational outcome. Am J Roentg 160: 147–152

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Wien

About this paper

Cite this paper

Woischneck, D., Firsching, R. (1998). Efficiency of the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS)-Score for the Long-Term Follow-Up after Severe Brain Injuries. In: Marmarou, A., et al. Intracranial Pressure and Neuromonitoring in Brain Injury. Acta Neurochirurgica Supplements, vol 71. Springer, Vienna. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6475-4_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Vienna

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7091-7331-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-7091-6475-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics