Zusammenfassung
In medizinischen Kontexten ist interprofessionelles Arbeiten unabdingbar, um eine optimale Patient:innenversorgung sicherzustellen. Damit dies gelingt, müssen in der Gesundheitsversorgung Tätige über umfangreiche Kommunikations- und Kollaborationskompetenzen verfügen, die im Rahmen der Aus- und Weiterbildung aufgebaut werden müssen. Computertechnologien bieten sowohl für deren Aufbau als auch für die Unterstützung interprofessioneller Lern- und Arbeitsprozesse große Potenziale. Der Beitrag beschreibt zentrale Erkenntnisse der empirischen Forschung zum computerunterstützten kollaborativen Lernen und überträgt diese auf den Kontext des interprofessionellen Lernens und Arbeitens in der Gesundheitsversorgung. Nach einer Darstellung der theoretischen Grundlagen und relevanter empirischer Befunde wird beschrieben, wie Lernumgebungen in der interprofessionellen Gesundheitsversorgung gestaltet werden sollten, um bei den Nutzer:innen einen möglichst großen Lernerfolg im Sinne eines Erwerbs von Kommunikations- und Kollaborationskompetenzen zu erzielen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Literatur
Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psych Rev 84(2):191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
Bause I, Brich IR, Wesslein A-K, Hesse FW (2018) Using technological functions on a multi-touch table and their affordances to counteract biases and foster collaborative problem solving. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 13(1):7–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-018-9271-4
Chan KK (2011) Bridging research and practice: implementing and sustaining knowledge building in Hong Kong classrooms. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 6:147–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9121-0
Chen J, Wang M, Kirschner PA, Tsai C-C (2018) The role of collaboration, computer use, learning environments, and supporting strategies in CSCL: a meta-analysis. Rev Educ Res 88(6):799–843. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318791584
Chetty S, Bangalee V, Brysiewicz P (2020) Interprofessional collaborative learning in the workplace: a qualitative study at a non-governmental organisation in Durban, South Africa. BMC Med Educ 20:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02264-5
Chi MTH, Wylie R (2014) The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ Psych 49(4):219–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2014.965823
Cohen J (1990) Things I have learned (so far). Am Psychol 45:1304–1312. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.45.12.1304
Creß U, Oshima J, Rosé C, Wise A (2021) Foundations, processes, technologies, and methods: an overview of CSCL through its handbook. In: Creß U, Oshima J, Rosé C, Wise A (Hrsg) International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, New York, S 3–22
De Wever B, Van Keer H, Schellens T, Valcke M (2010) Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: the differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction. Comput Hum Behav 26(4):516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.008
Dillenbourg P (2013) Design for classroom orchestration. Comput Educ 69:485–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.013
Dillenbourg P, Tchounikine P (2007) Flexibility in macro-scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning. J Comp-Assist Learn 23(1):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00191.x
Enyedy N, Yoon S (2021) Immersive environments: learning in augmented + virtual reality. In: Creß U, Oshima J, Rosé C, Wise A (Hrsg) International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, New York, S 389–405
Fischer F, Kollar I, Stegmann K, Wecker C (2013) Towards a script theory of guidance in computer-supported collaborative learning. Educ Psychol 48(1):56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.748005
Gabelica C, De Maeyer S, Schippers MC (2022) Taking a free ride: how team learning affects social loafing. J Educ Psychol 114(4):716–733. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000713
Haag M, Fischer M (2017) Technologiegestütztes Lehren und Lernen in der Medizin. In: Kramme R (Hrsg) Informationsmanagement und Kommunikation in der Medizin. Springer, Berlin, S 107–117
Halatchliyski I, Moskaliuk J, Kimmerle J, Creß U (2014) Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 9:97–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9182-3
Hautz WE, Kämmer JE, Schauber SK, Spies CD, Gaissmaier W (2015) Diagnostic performance by medical students working individually or in teams. JAMA 313(3):303–304. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15770
Janssen J, Kollar I (2021) Experimental and quasi-experimental research in CSCL. In: Creß U, Oshima J, Rosé C, Wise A (Hrsg) International handbook of computer-supported collaborative learning. Springer, New York, S 497–515
Jeong H, Hmelo-Silver CE, Jo K (2019) Ten years of computer-supported collaborative learning: a meta-analysis of CSCL in STEM education during 2005-2014. Educ Res Rev 28:100284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100284
Kalyuga S (2007) Expertise reversal effect and its implications for learner-tailored instruction. Educ Psychol Rev 19:509–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9054-3
Kiesewetter J, Kollar I, Fernandez N, Lubarsky S, Kiessling C, Fischer MR, Charlin B (2016) Crossing boundaries in interprofessional education: a call for instructional integration of two script concepts. J Int Care 30(5):689–692. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2016.1184238
Kiesewetter J, Hege I, Sailer M, Bauer E, Schultz C, Platz M, Adler M (2022) Implementing remote collaboration in a virtual patient platform: usability study. JMIR Med Educ 8(3):e24306. https://doi.org/10.2196/24306
Kollar I, Wecker C, Langer S, Fischer F (2011) Orchestrating web-based collaborative inquiry learning with small group and classroom scripts. In: Spada H, Stahl G, Miyake N, Law N (Hrsg) Connecting computer-supported collaborative learning to policy and practice: CSCL2011 conference proceedings, vol. 1 – long papers. International Society of the Learning Sciences, S 422–429
Kollar I, Pilz F, Fischer F (2014) Why it is hard to make use of new learning spaces: a script perspective. Technol Pedagog Educ 23(1):7–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.841615
Kollar I, Wecker C, Fischer F (2018) Scaffolding and scripting (computer-supported) collaborative learning. In: Fischer F, Hmelo-Silver CE, Goldman SR, Reimann P (Hrsg) International handbook of the learning sciences. Routledge, New York, S 340–350
Kollar I, Greisel M, Özbek T, Spang L, Vogel F (im Druck) Computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Gegenfurtner A, Kollar I (Hrsg) Designing effective digital learning environments. Routledge, New York
Koops W, Van der Vleuten C, De Leng B, Oei SG, Snoeckx L (2011) Computer-supported collaborative learning in the medical workplace: students’ experiences on formative peer feedback of a critical appraisal of a topic paper. Med Teacher 33(6):e318–e323. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.575901
Koops W, Van der Vleuten C, De Leng B, Houterman S, Snoeckx L (2014) Computer-supported collaborative learning at the clinical workplace: students’ perceptions and the effect of knowledge construction on learning outcome. J Contemp Med Educ 2(2):71–78. https://doi.org/10.5455/jcme.20140217024022
Koops WJ, van der Vleuten CP, de Leng BA, Snoeckx LH (2012) Computer supported collaborative learning in a clerkship: an exploratory study on the relation of discussion activity and revision of critical appraisal papers. BMC Med Educ 12:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-79
Kourdioukova EV, Verstraete KL, Valcke M (2011) The quality and impact of computer supported collaborative learning (CSCL) in radiology case-based learning. Eur J Radiol 78(3):353–362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.08.041
Lajoie SP, Lu J (2012) Supporting collaboration with technology: does shared cognition lead to co-regulation in medicine? Metacogn Learn 7:45–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9077-5
Lauscher A, Ng L, Napoles C, Tetreault J (2020) Rhethorik, logic, and dialect: advancing theory-based argument quality assessment in natural language processing. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING, A). Barcelona, S 4563–4574
Lee A, O’Donnell AM, Kempler Rogat T (2015) Exploration of the cognitive regulatory sub-processes employed by groups characterized by socially shared and other-regulation in a CSCL context. Comp Hum Behav 52:617–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.072
Lui M, Slotta JD (2014) Immersive simulations for smart classrooms: exploring evolutionary concepts in secondary science. Technol Pedagog Educ 23(1):57–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.838452
März E, Wessels I, Kollar I, Fischer MR (2021) I just stand around and look friendly’ – comparing medical students’ and physicians’ ward round scripts. Med Teacher 43(5):560–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2021.1877267
McLaney E, Morassaei S, Hughes L, Davies R, Campbell M, Di Prospero L (2022) A framework for interprofessional team collaboration in a hospital setting: advancing team competencies and behaviours. Healthc Manag Forum 35(2):112–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/08404704211063584
Meier A, Spada H, Rummel N (2007) A rating scheme for assessing the quality of computer-supported collaboration processes. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 2:63–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-006-9005-x
Mu J, Stegmann K, Mayfield E, Rosé C, Fischer F (2012) The ACODEA framework: developing segmentation and classification schemes for fully automatic analysis of online discussions. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 7(2):285–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-012-9147-y
Peterson AT, Roseth CJ (2016) Effects of four CSCL strategies for enhancing online discussion forums: Social interdependence, summarizing, scripts, and synchronicity. Int J Educ Res 76:147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.009
Piaget J (1977) The development of thought: equilibration of cognitive structures. Viking, New York
Popov V, van Leeuwen A, Buis SCA (2017) Are you with me or not? Temporal synchronicity and transactivity during CSCL. J Comp-Assist Learn 33:424–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12185
Radkowitsch A, Vogel F, Fischer F (2020) Good for learning, bad for motivation? A meta-analysis on the effects of computer-supported collaboration scripts. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 15(1):5–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09316-4
Radkowitsch A, Sailer M, Schmidmaier R, Fischer MR, Fischer F (2021) Learning to diagnose collaboratively – effects of adaptive collaboration scripts in agent-based medical simulations. Learn Instr 75:101487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101487
Rummel N, Spada H (2005) Learning to collaborate: an instructional approach to promoting collaborative problem solving in computer-mediated settings. J Learn Sci 14(2):201–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2
Ryan RM, Deci EL (2000) Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol 55:68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Saqr M, Viberg O, Vartiainen H (2020) Capturing the participation and social dimensions of computer-supported collaborative learning through social network analysis: which method and measures matter? Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 15:227–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09322-6
Schwaighofer M, Vogel F, Kollar I, Ufer S, Strohmaier A, Terwedow I, Ottinger S, Reiss K, Fischer F (2017) How to combine collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples to foster mathematical argumentation – when working memory matters. Int J Comp-Support Collab Lean 12(3):281–305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9260-z
Slof B, Nijsdam D, Janssen J (2016) Do interpersonal skills and interpersonal perceptions predict student learning in CSCL-environments? Comput Educ 97:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.012
Stegmann K, Weinberger A, Fischer F (2011) Aktives Lernen durch Argumentieren: Evidenz für das Modell der argumentativen Wissenskonstruktion in Online-Diskussionen. Unterrichtswissenschaft 39(3):231–244. https://doi.org/10.25656/01:8728
Suthers DD (2012) Computer-supported collaborative learning. In: Seel NM (Hrsg) Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. Springer, New York, S 719–722
Talan T (2021) The effect of computer-supported collaborative learning on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Int J Educ Mat Sci Technol 9(3):426–488. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.1243
Vogel F, Wecker C, Kollar I, Fischer F (2017) Socio-cognitive scaffolding with collaboration scripts: a meta-analysis. Educ Psychol Rev 29(3):477–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
Vogel F, Kollar I, Fischer F, Reiss K, Ufer S (2022) Adaptable scaffolding of mathematical argumentation skills: The role of self-regulation when scaffolded with CSCL scripts and heuristic worked examples. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 17(1):39–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09363-z
Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press, Harvard
Walker E, Rummel N, Koedinger KR (2011) Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 6(2):279–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9111-2
Wang X, Kollar, I, Stegmann K (2017) Adaptable scripting to foster regulation processes and skills in computer-supported collaborative learning. Int J Comp-Supp Coll Learn 12(2):153–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9254-x
Weinberger A, Stegmann K, Fischer F (2010) Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not). Comput Hum Behav 26(4):506–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.08.007
Weinberger A, Marttunen M, Laurinen L, Stegmann K (2013) Inducing socio-cognitive conflict in Finnish and German groups of online learners by CSCL script. Int J Comput-Support Collab Learn 8:333–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9173-4
Weiner B (1986) An attributional theory of motivation and emotion. Springer, New York
Witti MJ, Zottmann JM, Wershofen B, Thistlethwaite JE, Fischer F, Fischer MR (2023) FINCA – a conceptual framework to improve interprofessional collaboration in health education and care. Front Med 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2023.1213300
Wood D, Bruner JS, Ross G (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Child Psychol Psychiatr Allied Discipl 17(2):89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Zheng L, Huang R, Yu J (2014) Identifying computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) research in selected journals published from 2003 to 2012: a content analysis of research topics and issues. J Educ Technol Soc 17(4):335–351
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Kollar, I., Özbek, T. (2024). Computergestütztes Lernen in interprofessionellen Kontexten. In: Walkenhorst, U., Fischer, M. (eds) Interprofessionelle Bildung für die Gesundheitsversorgung. Springer Reference Pflege – Therapie – Gesundheit . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65420-0_48-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65420-0_48-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-65420-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-65420-0
eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Medizin