Zusammenfassung
Sexuelle Belästigung, Sexismus und „sexualisierte Vermeidung“ behindern vor allem Frauen bei der Arbeit. Dies ist besonders in der Forschung ein Problem, weil Wissenschaft immer noch als ein traditionell männlicher Beruf angesehen wird. Deshalb erleben sich Frauen in der Forschung oft als fehl am Platz und einige Akteure glauben sie hätten das Recht Frauen zu diskriminieren. Sexismus und sexuelle Belästigung können Frauen und Angehörige von Minderheiten unter Druck setzen, dafür sorgen, dass ihnen weniger Ressourcen zur Verfügung stehen oder dass sie von Projekten ausgeschlossen und gemieden werden. Unternehmen, die sexuelle Belästigung gezielt bekämpfen, können damit allerdings erfolgreich sein. Neben den offensichtlichen Vorteilen, die es hat Sexismus zu bekämpfen, hat Forschung, die unter Beteiligung von Frauen und Männern entsteht, bessere Chancen wichtige Themen zu erkennen und qualitativ hochwertige Ergebnisse hervorzubringen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Abele, A. E., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.005. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Anderson, N. (8. August 2019). Dartmouth plans $14 million settlement of suit accusing college of ‚Animal House‘ climate on sexual misconduct. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2019/08/07/dartmouth-plans-million-settlement-suit-accusing-college-animal-house-climate-sexual-misconduct/. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Barreto, M., & Ellemers, N. (2005). The burden of benevolent sexism: How it contributes to the maintenance of gender inequalities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 633–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.270
Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425
Berdahl, J. L., Magley, V. J., & Waldo, C. R. (1996). The sexual harassment of men?: Exploring the concept with theory and data. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 20(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1996.tb00320.x
Brandt, M. J. (2011). Sexism and gender inequality across 57 societies. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1413–1418. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41320046. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Braun, S., Hentschel, T., Peus, C., & Frey, D. (2015). Chancengleichheit durch professionelle Personalauswahl in der Wissenschaft. In C. Peus, S. Braun, T. Hentschel, & D. Frey (Hrsg.), Personalauswahl in der Wissenschaft: Evidenzbasierte Methoden und Impulse für die Praxis (S. 29–48). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48112-7_3
van den Brink, M. (2010). Behind the scenes of science – Gender practices in the recruitment and selection of professors in the Netherlands. Pallas Publications/Amsterdam University Press.
Browning, J. R., Hatfield, E., Kessler, D., & Levine, T. (2000). Sexual motives, gender, and sexual behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 29(2), 135–153. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1001903705153
Campbell, L. G., Mehtani, S., Dozier, M. E., & Rinehart, J. (2013). Gender-heterogeneous working groups produce higher quality science. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e79147. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079147
Dahl, J., Vescio, T., & Weaver, K. (2015). How threats to masculinity sequentially cause public discomfort, anger, and ideological dominance over women. Social Psychology, 46, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000248
Dardenne, B., Dumont, M., & Bollier, T. (2007). Insidious dangers of benevolent sexism: Consequences for women’s performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 764–779. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.764
Dekhtyar, S., Weber, D., Helgertz, J., & Herlitz, A. (2018). Sex differences in academic strengths contribute to gender segregation in education and occupation: A longitudinal examination of 167,776 individuals. Intelligence, 67, 84–92.
Destatis. (21. Oktober 2019a). Statistisches Bundesamt Deutschland – GENESIS-Online: Ergebnis – 21311-0015. Studienanfänger WS 2018/19: Bundesländer, Semester, Nationalität, Geschlecht, Studienfach. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online/data?operation=abruftabelleBearbeiten&levelindex=2&levelid=1571679957903&auswahloperation=abruftabelleAuspraegungAuswaehlen&auswahlverzeichnis=ordnungsstruktur&auswahlziel=werteabruf&selectionname=0015&auswahltext=&werteabruf=Werteabruf. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Destatis. (24. Oktober 2019b). Datenreport 2018 – Kapitel 3: Bildung. Statistisches Bundesamt. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Service/Statistik-Campus/Datenreport/Downloads/datenreport-2018-kap-3.html. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109(3), 573–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.109.3.573
Fox, C. W., & Paine, C. E. T. (2019). Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution. Ecology and Evolution, 9(6), 3599–3619. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4993
Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310386121
Gervais, S. J., Vescio, T. K., & Allen, J. (2012). When are people interchangeable sexual objects? The effect of gender and body type on sexual fungibility. The British Journal of Social Psychology/the British Psychological Society, 51, 499–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02016.x
Griffin, J. M., Kruger, S., & Maturana, G. (2019). Personal infidelity and professional conduct in 4 settings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(33), 16268. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1905329116
Harrison, D. A., Price, K. H., & Bell, M. P. (1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/256901
Hengel, E. (2017). Publishing while female. Are women held to higher standards? Evidence from peer review. [Working Paper]. University of Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.17548
Holman, L., Stuart-Fox, D., & Hauser, C. E. (2018). The gender gap in science: How long until women are equally represented? PLoS Biology, 16(4), e2004956. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2004956
Hundhammer, T., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 176–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028121
Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65(1), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057
Ibarra, H. (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 422–447.
Kang, J.-A., Hubbard, G., & Hong, S. (2019). Gender and credibility in branded storytelling. Gender in Management: An International Journal, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-02-2019-0015
Kaplan, H. (2012). Belief in a just world, religiosity and victim blaming. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 34, 397–409. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341246
Karremans, J. C., Verwijmeren, T., Pronk, T. M., & Reitsma, M. (2009). Interacting with women can impair men’s cognitive functioning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 1041–1044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.004
Keltner, D. (2016). The power paradox: How we gain and lose influence. Penguin Press.
Klein, L. B., & Martin, S. L. (2019). Sexual harassment of college and university students: A systematic review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 1524838019881731. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838019881731
Koch, S. C., Konigorski, S., & Sieverding, M. (2014). Sexist behavior undermines women’s performance in a job application situation. Sex Roles, 70(3), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0342-3
Kunstman, J. W., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Sexual overperception: Power, mating motives, and biases in social judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 282–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021135
Lindquist, C., & McKay, T. (2010). Sexual harassment experiences and consequences for women faculty in science, engineering, and medicine. In RTI press policy brief. RTI Press. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK542738/. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Logel, C., Walton, G. M., Spencer, S. J., Iserman, E. C., von Hippel, W., & Bell, A. E. (2009). Interacting with sexist men triggers social identity threat among female engineers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(6), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015703
Masser, B. M., & Abrams, D. (2004). Reinforcing the glass ceiling: The consequences of hostile sexism for female managerial candidates. Sex Roles, 51(9/10), 609–615.
Merton, R. K. (1979). The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. University of Chicago Press.
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Peters, K. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000059
O’Hare, E. A., & O’Donohue, W. (1998). Sexual harassment: Identifying risk factors. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 27(6), 561–580. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018769016832
Peters, K., Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2015). Marines, medics, and machismo: Lack of fit with masculine occupational stereotypes discourages men’s participation. British Journal of Psychology, 106(4), 635–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12106
Phillips, K. W., & Loyd, D. L. (2006). When surface and deep-level diversity collide: The effects on dissenting group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99(2), 143–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.12.001
Pickett, C. (2017). Let’s look at the big picture: A system-level approach to assessing scholarly merit. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/tv6nb
Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1995.tb01309.x
Rippon, G. (2019). The gendered brain: The new neuroscience that shatters the myth of the female brain. Bodley Head.
Roberson, Q. M., Phillips, K. W., Duguid, M., Thomas-Hunt, M., & Uparna, J. (2013). Diversity as knowledge exchange: The roles of information processing, expertise, and status. Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199736355.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199736355-e-9. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Rudman, L. A., & Mescher, K. (2012). Of animals and objects: Men’s implicit dehumanization of women and male sexual aggression. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 734–746.
Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2008). Backlash effects for disconfirming gender stereotypes in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.04.003
Salerno, J., & Peter-Hagene, L. (2015). One angry woman: Anger expression increases influence for men, but decreases influence for women, During Group Deliberation. Law and Human Behavior, 39. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000147
Schröttle, M., Meshkova, K., & Lehmann, C. (2019). Umgang mit sexueller Belästigung am Arbeitsplatz – Lösungsstrategien und Maß-nahmen zur Intervention. MKL Druck GmbH & Co. KG. https://www.antidiskriminierungsstelle.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/publikationen/Expertisen/Umgang_mit_sexueller_Belaestigung_am_Arbeitsplatz.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=5. Zugegriffen am 24.05.2021.
Shah, D. K., Correia, K. F., Vitonis, A. F., & Missmer, S. A. (2013). Body size and endometriosis: Results from 20 years of follow-up within the Nurses’ Health Study II prospective cohort. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England), 28(7), 1783–1792. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det120
Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67(1), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-073115-103235
Stephan, W. G. (2014). Intergroup anxiety: Theory, research, and practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(3), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314530518
Vercellini, P., Buggio, L., Somigliana, E., Barbara, G., Vigano, P., & Fedele, L. (2013). Attractiveness of women with rectovaginal endometriosis: A case-control study. Fertility and Sterility, 99(1), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.08.039
Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E. (1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 117–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298012002
Wirth, J. H., Sacco, D. F., Hugenberg, K., & Williams, K. D. (2010). Eye gaze as relational evaluation: Averted eye gaze leads to feelings of ostracism and relational devaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(7), 869–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210370032
Zeigler-Hill, V., Besser, A., Morag, J., & Keith Campbell, W. (2016). The dark triad and sexual harassment proclivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.048
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer-Verlag GmbH, DE, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Burghardt, J. (2021). Sexuelle Belästigung, sexualisierte Vermeidung und Sexismus. In: Arbeitsplatz Wissenschaft . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63893-4_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-63893-4_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-63892-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-63893-4
eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)