Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Gesundheit und Medizin im interdisziplinären Diskurs ((GESUNDMED))

  • 431 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Was mit dem knapp vierseitigen Aufsatz „The Physician’s Dilemma: A Doctor’s View: What Law Should Be“ der Kinderärztin Karen Teel begonnen hatte, erreichte über die gezeigten Etappen bis Ende der 1980er-Jahre eine weitreichende Akzeptanz im US-amerikanischen Gesundheitswesen. Dieser Prozess führte schließlich zur Übernahme der Klinischen Ethikberatung in die Akkreditierungskriterien der Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organisations. Im Jahr 2007 verfügten 81 Prozent der US-amerikanisch-allgemeinen Kliniken und alle Krankenhäuser über 400 Betten über Klinische Ethikberatung. Die junge Beratungsform konnte sich langfristig als adaptionsfähiges Konzept für alle klinischen Versorgungsbereiche behaupten. Waren die Empfehlungen zur Ethikberatung der Präsidentenkommission für die Entscheidungsfindung in Behandlungssituationen von „incapacitated individuals“ und die „Model Guidelines for Health Care Providers to Establish Infant Care Review Committees“ des HHS für Therapiekonflikte bei „disabled infants with life-threatening conditions“ verfasst, so nahmen die Richtlinien der Joint Commission die unmittelbare Patientenversorgung in allen klinischen Fachbereichen in den Blick.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Vgl. Fox et al. (2007), S. 15.

  2. 2.

    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983), S. 160.

  3. 3.

    Department of Health and Human Services (1985), S. 14894.

  4. 4.

    Vgl. Weir (1992), S. 1–3. Angell (1983), S. 660. Salloch et al. (2016), S. 274/275.

  5. 5.

    Robinson (1976), S. 312.

  6. 6.

    American Academy of Pediatrics – Committee on Bioethics (1983), S. 566.

  7. 7.

    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983), S. 168.

  8. 8.

    Rosner (1985), S. 2696.

  9. 9.

    Abram und Wolf (1984), S. 627.

  10. 10.

    Robinson (1976), S. 312.

  11. 11.

    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983), S. 163.

  12. 12.

    Department of Health and Human Services (1985), S. 14894.

  13. 13.

    Robinson (1976), S. 312.

  14. 14.

    Vgl. Jansky et al. (2013), S. 779. Thomasma (1985), S. 206/207.

  15. 15.

    Robinson (1976), S. 313.

  16. 16.

    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983), S. 166.

  17. 17.

    Weir (1987), S. 105–107.

  18. 18.

    Vgl. Iserson et al. (1989), S. 74.

  19. 19.

    Berseth (1983), S. 429.

  20. 20.

    Robinson (1976), S. 308.

  21. 21.

    Vgl. N. N. (1992), S. 318. Fost (1992), S. 72/73.

  22. 22.

    President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1982), S. 6.

  23. 23.

    Drane (1994), S. 47.

Literatur

  • Abram MB, Wolf SM (1984) Public involvement in medical ethics: a model for government action. N Engl J Med 310:627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics – Committee on Bioethics (1983) Treatment of critically ill newborns. Pediatrics 72(4):565–566

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell M (1983) Handicapped children: Baby Doe and Uncle Sam. N Engl J Med 309:659–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berseth CL (1983) A neonatologist looks at the Baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict. Pediatrics 72:428–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health and Human Services (1985) Services and treatment for disabled infants. Model guidelines for health care providers to establish infant care review committees. Fed Regist 50(72):14878–14901

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane JF (1994) Clinical bioethics. Theory and practice in medical ethical decision making. Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Fost N (1992) Infant care committees in the aftermath of Baby Doe. In: Caplan AL, Blank RH, Merrick JC (Hrsg) Compelled compassion. Government intervention in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Totowa, S 285–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox E, Myers S, Pearlman RA (2007) Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: a national survey. Am J Bioeth 7(2):13–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iserson KV, Goffin FB, Markham JJ (1989) The future functions of hospital ethics committees. HEC Forum 1:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansky M, Marx G, Nauck F, Alt-Epping B (2013) Physicians’ and nurses’ expectations and objections toward a clinical ethics committee. Nurs Ethics 20(7):771–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • N. N. (1992) Appendix. In: Caplan AL, Blank RH, Merrick JC (Hrsg) Compelled compassion. Government intervention in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Totowa, S 317–320

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1982) Making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. Volume One: Report. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1983) Deciding to forego life-sustaining treatment. A report on the ethical, medical, and legal issues in treatment decisions. Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson DN (Hrsg) (1976) In the matter of Karen Quinlan, Bd. II. The complete briefs, oral arguments, and opinion in the New Jersey Supreme Court. Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosner F (1985) Hospital medical ethics committees: a review of their development. J Am Med Assoc 253(18):2693–2697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salloch S, Ritter P, Wäscher S et al (2016) Was ist ein ethisches Problem und wie finde ich es? Theoretische, methodologische und forschungspraktische Fragen der Identifikation ethischer Probleme am Beispiel einer empirisch-ethischen Interventionsstudie. Ethik Medizin 28:267–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomasma DC (1985) Hospital ethics committees and hospital policy. Qual Rev Bull 11:204–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir RF (1987) Pediatric ethics committees: ethical advisers or legal watchdogs? Law Med Health Care 15(3):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weir RF (1992) Life-and-death decisions in the midst of uncertainty. In: Caplan AL, Blank RH, Merrick, JC (Hrsg) Compelled compassion. Government intervention in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Totowa, S 1–33

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bleyer, B. (2019). Bilanz nach drei Etappen. In: Pragmatische Urteile in der unmittelbaren Patientenversorgung. Gesundheit und Medizin im interdisziplinären Diskurs. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58672-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-58672-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-58671-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-58672-3

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics