Abstract
It was very agreeable to me, famous Sir, that it pleased you to examine my two disputations. It would be even more agreeable if the occupations in which you spend your days had let you a little more time so that you would have more thoroughly understood the mind of those who are involved and what I think.
To the famous and experienced,
Mr Anton Deusing,
Doctor in medicine and illustrious Professor, with greetings from Niels Stensen
OPH 4 vol. I, 61–73: “Responsio ad vindicias hepatis redivivi” is the second of the four treatises in Nicolai Stenonis observationes anatomicæ … Lugd. Batav. 1662. It is a reply to Deusing’s “Vindiciæ hepatis redivivi”, directed against van Horne , whom Deusing took to be the real author of Steno’s disputatio anatomica de glandulis oris … Lugd. Batav. 1661. Further annotations by Vilhelm Maar are found in the transcripts, www.extras.springer.com.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kardel, T., Maquet, P. (2018). 2.4 Response to Vindications for Rehabilitation of the Liver. In: Nicolaus Steno. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55047-2_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55047-2_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55046-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55047-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)