Skip to main content

Ziele im Coaching

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Schlüsselkonzepte im Coaching

Part of the book series: Springer Reference Psychologie ((SRP))

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag diskutiert Kontroversen über das Ziel-Konzept im Coaching, stellt Zieldefinitionen vor und vielfältige Facetten aus einem großen Wissensfundus wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten über Ziele und Zielsetzung. Behandelt werden die Zielsetzungs- und Selbstbestimmungstheorie sowie proximale und distale Ergebnisziele, Leistungs- und Lernziele, Vermeidungs- und Annäherungsziele, konfligierende Ziele, Zielvernachlässigung und unbewusste Ziele. Die Faktoren werden in einem integrativen Modell zusammengefasst, das Coaches als praktische Orientierung dienen kann. Ergebnisse einer empirischen Studie zeigen, dass der Zielerreichungsgrad mit einem zielorientierten Coachingstil zusammenhängt.

Bei diesem Beitrag handelt es sich um eine gekürzte Übersetzung von: Grant, A. M. (2013). New Perspectives on Goal Setting in Coaching Practice: An Integrated Model of Goal-Focused Coaching. In S. David, D. Clutterbuck, & D. Megginson (Hrsg.), Beyond Goals: Effective Strategies for Coaching and Mentoring (S. 55–83). London: Gower Publishing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Dieser Beitrag wurde von Anne Lohmann, Siegfried Greif und Hansjörg Künzli aus dem englischen Original (Grant 2013b; © Anthony M. Grant 2013) ins Deutsche übersetzt und gekürzt. Die Langfassung erscheint in der Zeitschrift Coaching – Theorie & Praxis.

  2. 2.

    Das GROW Modell ist eine häufig verwendete Methode, um die Coaching-Gespräche durch Ziele für jede Coaching-Sitzung zu strukturieren. Nach der Zielklärung wird jeweils erörtert, wie realistisch die angestrebte Situation ist, mögliche alternative Optionen werden erkundet und schließlich wird die Sitzung mit einer Entscheidung über konkrete Handlungsschritte abgeschlossen. Auch wenn dieses Vorgehen wie ein simpler, linearer Prozess erscheinen mag, kann das GROW Modell sehr raffiniert iterativ eingesetzt werden, wobei sich das Gespräch zwischen den Phasen vor und zurück bewegt (mehr dazu in Grant 2011).

Literatur

  • Austin, J. T., & Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: Structure, process, and content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3), 338–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chulef, A. S., Read, S. J., & Walsh, D. A. (2001). A hierarchical taxonomy of human goals. Motivation and Emotion, 25(3), 191–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutterbuck, D. (2010). Coaching reflection: The liberated coach. Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 73–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coats, E. J., Janoff-Bulman, R., & Alpert, N. (1996). Approach versus avoidance goals: Differences in self-evaluation and well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(10), 1057–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, W., & Tesser, A. (1996). The „what the hell“ effect: Some effects of goal proximity and goal framing on performance. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Hrsg.), Striving and feeling (S. 99–123). New Jersey: LEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Custers, R., & Aarts, H. (2010). The unconscious will: How the pursuit of goals operates outside of conscious awareness. Science, 329(5987), 47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1980). Self-determination theory: When mind mediates behavior. Journal of Mind & Behavior, 1(1), 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Perceived autonomy support scale. http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/measures/needs_scl.html. Zugegriffen am 24.01.2018.

  • Describing Goal Setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, February, 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doran, G. T. (1981). There’s a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management’s goals and objectives. Management Review, 70(11), 35–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., Emslie, H., Williams, P., Johnson, R., & Freer, C. (1996). Intelligence and the frontal lobe: The organization of goal-directed behavior. Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 257–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., Sheldon, K. M., & Church, M. A. (1997). Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(9), 915–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Simple effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2006). An integrative goal-focused approach to executive coaching. In D. Stober & A. M. Grant (Hrsg.), Evidence based coaching handbook (S. 153–192). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2011). Is it time to regrow the grow model? Issues related to teaching coaching session structures. The Coaching Psychologist, 7(2), 118–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2013a). Autonomy support, relationship satisfaction and goal focus in the coach–coachee relationship: Which best predicts coaching success? Coaching: An International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 7(1), 18–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2013b). New perspectives on goal setting in coaching practice: An integrated model of goal-focused coaching. In D. Clutterbuck, D. Megginson & S. David (Hrsg.), Beyond goals: Effective strategies for coaching and mentoring (S. 55–84). London: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M. (2017). Integration von Zielkonzepten in die Coachingpraxis – Ein integratives Modell zielorientierten Coachings. Coaching – Theorie & Praxis, https://doi.org/10.1365/s40896-017-0020-x.

  • Grant, A. M., & Cavanagh, M. (2007). The goal-focused coaching skill questionnaire: Preliminarily findings. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 35(6), 751–760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Green, J. (2004). Coach yourself. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, J. B., & Levy, P. E. (2015). How feedback and goals drive behavior: Control theory. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gresham, F. M., Evans, S., & Elliott, S. N. (1988). Academic and social self-efficacy scale: Development and initial validation. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 6(2), 125–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, F. M. (1999). The handbook of coaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2002). Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution: Implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(1), 62–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karniol, R., & Ross, M. (1996). The motivational impact of temporal focus: Thinking about the future and the past. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 593–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbrink, E. A., Ryan, A. M., & Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of goals and affect in working memory functioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 11(2), 213–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A. (1996). Motivation through conscious goal setting. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 5(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. (2000). Motivation, cognition, and action: An analysis of studies of task goals and knowledge. Applied Psychology, 49(3), 408–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manderlink, G., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1984). Proximal versus distal goal setting and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(4), 918–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. A. & Rutgers, U. (1982). The stasis and flow of behavior: Toward a theory of goals. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1982, 1–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raia, A. P. (1965). Goal setting and self-control: An empirical study. Journal of Management Studies, 2(1), 34–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002). Motivation and dropout in female handballers: A 21-month prospective study. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(3), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seijts, G. H., & Latham, G. P. (2001). The effect of distal learning, outcome, and proximal goals on a moderately complex task. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(3), 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Not all personal goals are personal: Comparing autonomous and controlled reasons for goals as predictors of effort and attainment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(5), 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Kasser, T. (1995). Coherence and congruence: Two aspects of personality integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(3), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Street, H. (2002). Exploring relationships between goal setting, goal pursuit and depression: A review. Australian Psychologist, 37(2), 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, E., & Yun, S. (2000). The effects of proximal and distal goals on goal level, strategy development, and group performance. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 36(3), 336–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmore, J. (1992). Coaching for performance. London: Nicholas Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, D., & Latham, G. P. (1996). The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group & Organization Management, 21(2), 236–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony M. Grant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Grant, A.M. (2018). Ziele im Coaching. In: Greif, S., Möller, H., Scholl, W. (eds) Handbuch Schlüsselkonzepte im Coaching. Springer Reference Psychologie . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49483-7_82

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49483-7_82

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49481-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49483-7

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics