Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Respekt

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychologie der Werte

  • 58k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Von anderen respektiert zu werden, wünschen sich Menschen in allen Gesellschaften. Jemanden zu respektieren heißt, ihm Wertschätzung entgegenzubringen und ihn ernst zu nehmen. Es können zwei Arten von Respekt unterschieden werden: Bewertender Respekt, der sich auf positiv bewertete Eigenschaften oder Verdienste einer Person bezieht, und anerkennender Respekt, bei dem es um die bedingungslose Wertschätzung einer Person als Mensch geht. Wie bereits Immanuel Kant im Jahr 1785 schrieb, ist auch der Respekt gegenüber der eigenen Person wichtig. Wer sich selbst respektiert, achtet seine eigene Würde als Mensch und setzt sich gegen Verhalten zur Wehr, das diese missachtet. Selbstrespekt ist eine zentrale Voraussetzung für ein selbstbestimmtes Leben. Daher ist es für die Förderung des Wertes Respekt in der Gesellschaft besonders wichtig, dass der Selbstrespekt von Menschen gefördert wird. Denn nur wer selbst von sich und von anderen respektiert wird, kann auch anderen Respekt entgegenbringen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Assmann, A. (2009). Höflichkeit und Respekt. In: G. Engel, B. Rang, S. Scholz, & J. Süßmann (Hrsg.), Konjunkturen der Höflichkeit in der Frühen Neuzeit (S. 173–189). Frankfurt a. M: Vittorio Klostermann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augsberger, A., Schudrich, W., McGowan, B. G., & Auerbach, C. (2012). Respect in the workplace: A mixed methods study of retention and turnover in the voluntary child welfare sector. Children and Youth Services Review 34 (7), 1222–1229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review 84 (2), 191–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bird, C. (2010). Self-respect and the Respect of Others. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (2003). In search of respect: Selling crack in El Barrio (Vol. 10). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance – A theory of freedom and control. New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, S. (2006). The role of unconditional respect for persons and emotion in moral judgment. MSc Thesis, University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). NEO-PI-R: Professional manual. Odessa, Fl: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. (1977). Two Kinds of Respect. Ethics 88, 36–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLellis, A. J. (2000). Clarifying the Concept of Respect: Implications for Leadership. The Journal of Leadership Studies 7 (2), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, R. S. (2014). Respect. First published Wed Sep 10, 2003; substantive revision Tue Feb 4, 2014. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring Edition 2014. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/respect/. Zugegriffen: 10. Februar 2015.

  • Gremigni, P., Sommaruga, M., & Peltenburg, M. (2008). Validation of the Health Care Communication Questionnaire (HCCQ) To Measure Outpatients’ Experience of Communication With Hospital Staff. Patient Education and Counseling 71 (1), 57–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grosse, C. U. (2002). Managing Communication Within Virtual Intercultural Teams. Business Communication Quarterly 65 (4), 22–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785/1997). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals/Immanuel Kant; translated and edited by Mary Gregor. [Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, English]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lalljee, M., Laham, S. M., & Tam, T. (2007). Unconditional respect for persons: A social psychological analysis. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 38 (4), 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, J. D., Brennan, E. M., & Briggs, H. E. (2005). The African American adolescent respect scale: A measure of a prosocial attitude. Research on Social Work Practice 15 (6), 462–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, L., & Wallace, M. (2011). The communication of respect as a significant dimension of cross-cultural communication competence. Cross-Cultural Communication 7(3), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margalit, A. (1994). The Decent Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ok, H., Marks, R., & Allegrante, J. (2008). Perceptions of health care provider communication activity among American cancer survivors and Adults Without Cancer Histories: an analysis of the 2003 Health Information Trends Survey (HINTS) Data. Journal of Health Communication 13 (7), 637–653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P., & Lee-Wong, S. (2003). Reconceptualizing Politeness To Accommodate Dynamic Tensions in Subordinate-To-Superior Reporting. Journal of Business and Technical Communication 17 (4), 379–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salacuse, J. W. (2005). The Deal is Done – Now What? Negotiation, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönberger, J. (2010). Die Wiederentdeckung des Respekts: Wie interkulturelle Begegnungen gelingen. München: Kösel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sung, K. T. (2004). Elder respect among young adults: A cross-cultural study of Americans and Koreans. Journal of Aging Studies 18, 138–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, G. (1985). Pride, Shame, and Guilt: Emotions of Self-Assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telfer, E. (1968). “Self-Respect”. The Philosophical Quarterly 18, 114–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S., Harris, S., Mahoney, K., Con, A., & McGuinness, L. (2004). The context of health care communication in chronic illness. Patient Education and Counseling 54 (3), 299–306.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Quaquebeke, N., Henrich, D. C., & Eckloff, T. (2007). “It’s not tolerance I’m asking for, it’s respect!” A conceptual framework to differentiate between tolerance, acceptance and (two types of) respect. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung 38 (2), 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. München, Deutschland

    Lisa Lindner

Authors
  1. Lisa Lindner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lisa Lindner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Bayern, Germany

    Dieter Frey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lindner, L. (2016). Respekt. In: Frey, D. (eds) Psychologie der Werte. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48014-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48014-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48013-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48014-4

  • eBook Packages: Psychology (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation