Abstract
In reviewing the literature on spiritual well-Being in the Chinese context, it becomes clear that Chinese spirituality has not yet been systematically studied. Not only is there a lack of theoretical discussion of its conceptualization, but the underlying mechanism has not been studied or developed. Against this background, a qualitative study that aimed to explore the meaning of spiritual well-Being among Chinese older adults was conducted. This chapter describes the background, methodology, and findings based on focus group discussions and in-depth interviews conducted with members of four key stakeholder groups, including community-dwelling older adults, long-term care facility residents, family caregivers, and formal caregivers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2009). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Census and Statistics Department. (2009). Health status of Hong Kong residents & knowledge, attitude and practice of medical checkups. Thematic Household Survey Report No. 41. Hong Kong: Hong Kong SAR Government.
Gomez, R., & Fisher, J. W. (2005). The spiritual well-Being questionnaire: Testing for model applicability, measurement and structural equivalencies, and latent mean differences across gender. Personality and Individual Differences, 39(8), 1383–1393.
Hong Kong SAR Government (2013). Hong Kong—the fact sheet. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong SAR Government. Website: http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/religion.pdf. Last visited 21 June 2014.
Harrell, M. C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection methods. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups: DTIC Document.
Lawler-Row, K., & Elliott, J. (2009). The role of religious activity and spirituality in the health and well-Being of older adults. Journal of Health Psychology, 14(1), 43.
Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
Stewart, D. W., & Shamdasani, P. N. (2014). Focus groups (Vol. 20). New York: Sage.
Tse, S., Ng, R. M., Tonsing, K. N., & Ran, M. (2012). Families and family therapy in Hong Kong. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(2), 115–120.
Vachon, M., Fillion, L., & Achille, M. (2009). A conceptual analysis of spirituality at the end of life. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 12(1), 53–59.
Willis, J., Willis, J., Jost, M., & Nilakanta, R. (2007). Foundations of qualitative research: Interpretive and critical approaches. London: Sage Publications Inc.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lou, V.W.Q. (2015). Conceptualizing Spiritual well-Being: A Qualitative Inquiry. In: Spiritual Well-Being of Chinese Older Adults. SpringerBriefs in Well-Being and Quality of Life Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46303-1_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46303-1_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46302-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46303-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)