Abstract
The purpose of the paper is to identify the preference structures in the framework of actor-partner interdependence (APIM) model based on paired-comparison or ranking data (Thurstone Case III/V model). The households preferences of the income allocation between consumption, savings and investments are considered. Then, the preference structures among the families are identified on the basis of Thurstonian Case III preference model. Latent preferences are used to modeling the actor-partner interdependencies between the household members.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Apps, P. F., & Rees, R. (1993). Labor supply, household production and intra-family welfare distribution. Working Papers in Economics and Econometrics, Canberra, Australia: Australian National University, 248.
Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. A. (1998). Efficient intrahousehold allocation: A characterisation and tests. Econometrica, 66(6), 1241–1278.
Chiappori, P. A. (1988). Rational household labor supply. Econometrica, 56(1), 63–90.
Commuri, S., & Gentry, J. W. (2005). Resource allocation in households with women as chief wage earners. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(2), 185–195.
Cook, W. L., & Kenny, D. A.(2005). The actor-partner interdependence model: A model of bidirectional effects in developmental studies. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(2), 1001–1094.
Doss, Ch. (1996). Testing among models of intrahousehold resource allocation. World Development, 24(10), 1597–1609.
Kashy, D. A., & Donnellan, M. B. (2012). Conceptual and methodological issues in the analysis of data from dyads and groups. In K. Deaux & M. Snyder (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of personality and social psychology (pp. 209–238). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
Lazear, E. P., & Michael, R. T., (1988). Allocation of income within the household. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lise, J., & Seitz, S. (2011). Consumption inequality and intra-household allocations. Review of Economic Studies, 78, 328–355.
Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.
Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining approach. International Economic Review, 21(1), 31–44.
Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2003). On Thurstone’s model for paired comparisons and ranking data. In H. Yanai, A. Okada, K. Shigematu, Y. Kano & J.J. Meulman (Eds.), New Developments in Psychometrics (pp. 519–526). Tokyo: Springer.
Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Böckenholt, U. (2005). Structural equation modeling of paired-comparison and ranking data. Psychological Methods, 10(3), 285–304.
Mcelroy, M., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349.
Olsen, J., & Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychological Methods, 11(2), 127–141.
Rossi, P. E., Allenby, G., & McCulloch, R. (2005). Bayesian statistics and marketing. West Sussex: Wiley.
Simpson, J. A., Griskevicius, V., & Rothman, A. J. (2012). Bringing relationships into consumer decision-making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 329–331.
Temme, D., Paulssen, M. & Dannewald, T. (2008). Incorporating latent variables into discrete choice models. A Simultaneous Estimation Approach Using SEM Software, Business Research, 1(2), 220–237.
Yang, S., & Allenby, G. M. (2003). Modeling interdependent consumer preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 282–294.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sagan, A. (2015). Preferences Interdependence Among Family Members: Case III/APIM Approach. In: Lausen, B., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M. (eds) Data Science, Learning by Latent Structures, and Knowledge Discovery. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-44983-7_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-44982-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-44983-7
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)