Skip to main content
  • 9415 Accesses

Abstract

Like all scientific research, design science aims to develop scientific theories. As explained earlier in Fig. 1.3, a design science project starts from a knowledge context consisting of scientific theories, design specifications, useful facts, practical knowledge, and common sense. This is called prior knowledge. The set of scientific theories used as prior knowledge in a design research project is loosely called its theoretical framework. When it is finished, a design science project should have produced additional knowledge, called posterior knowledge. Our primary aim in design science is to produce posterior knowledge in the form of a contribution to a scientific theory. In this chapter, we discuss the nature, structure, and function of scientific theories in, respectively, Sects. 9.19.2, and 9.3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. W. Bechtel, A. Abrahamsen, Explanation: a mechanistic alternative. Studies in the Hist. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 36, 421–441 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. W. Bechtel, R.C. Richardson, Discovering Complexity: Decomposition and Localization as Strategies in Scientific Research (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2010); Reissue of the 1993 edition with a new introduction

    Google Scholar 

  3. R.A. Berk, Causal inference for sociological data, in Handbook of Sociology, ed. by N.J. Smelser. (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 1988), pp. 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Bunge, How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philos. Soc. Sci. 34(2), 182–210 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Cartwright, How the Laws of Physics Lie (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. N. Cartwright, Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cournand, M. Meyer. The scientist’s code. Minerva 14(1), 79–96 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C.F. Craver, Structure of scientific theories, in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, ed. by P. Machamer, M. Silberstein (Blackwell, Oxford, 2002), pp. 55–79

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. Cummins, ‘How does it work?’ versus ‘What are the laws?’: two conceptions of psychological explanation, in Explanation and Cognition, ed. by F.C. Keil, R.A. Wilson (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 117–144

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Elster, Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Elster, A plea for mechanisms, in Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, ed. by P. Hedström, R. Swedberg (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998), pp. 45–73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. W. Engelsman, D.A.C. Quartel, H. Jonkers, M.J. van Sinderen, Extending enterprise architecture modelling with business goals and requirements. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 5(1), 9–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W. Engelsman, R.J. Wieringa, Goal-oriented requirements engineering and enterprise architecture: Two case studies and some lessons learned, in Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ 2012), Essen, Germany. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7195 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012), pp. 306–320

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. Glennan, Rethinking mechanistic explanation. Philos. Sci. 69, S342–S353 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S.S. Glennan, Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis 44, 49–71 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Godfrey-Smith, Theory and Reality. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Goldthorpe, Causation, statistics, and sociology. Eur. Sociol. Rev. 17(1), 1–20 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Gregor, The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Gregor, D. Jones, The anatomy of a design theory. J. AIS 8(5), 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. P. Hedström, R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. Hedström, P. Ylikoski, Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 36, 49–67 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. C. Hitchcock, Probabilistic causation, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E.N. Zalta. Spring 2010 edition (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. P.W. Holland, Statistics and causal inference. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81(396), 945–960 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. T. Huynh, J. Miller, An empirical investigation into open source web applications’ implementation vulnerabilities. Empir. Softw. Eng. 15(5), 556–576 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. ISO, Systems and Software Engineering — Architecture Description. ISO/IEC/IEEE (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. A. Kaplan, The Conduct of Inquiry. Methodology for Behavioral Science (Transaction Publishers, Pscataway, 1998); First edition 1964 by Chandler Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  27. K.S. Kendler, Explanatory models for psychiatric illness. Am. J. Psychiatry 6, 695–702 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. T. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2nd edn. (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. Lakatos, Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes, in Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, ed. by I. Lakatos, A. Musgrave (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1970), pp. 91–196

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. I. Lakatos, Proofs and Refutations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976); Edited by J. Worall and E. Zahar

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Prechelt, B. Unger-Lamprecht, M. Philippsen, W.F. Tichy, Two controlled experiments assessing the usefulness of design pattern documentation in program maintenance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28(6), 595–606 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. P. Machamer, A brief historical introduction to the philosophy of science, in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Science, ed. by P. Machamer, M. Silberstein (Blackwell, Oxford, 2002), pp. 1–17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. P. Machamer, L. Darden, C.F. Craver, Thinking about mechanisms. Philos. Sci. 67, 1–25 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. P. McKay Illari, J. Williamson, What is a mechanism? Thinking about mechanisms across the sciences. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 2, 119–135 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. P. Menzies, Counterfactual theories of causation, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E.N. Zalta. Fall 2009 edition (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. R.K. Merton, The normative structure of science, in Social Theory and Social Structure (The Free Press, New York, 1968), pp. 267–278. Enlarged Edition

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Morgan, X. Winship, Counterfactuals and Causal Inference. Methods and Principles for Social Research (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. M. Parascandola, D.L. Weed, Causation in epidemiology. J. Epidemiol. Commun. Health 55, 905–912 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. J. Pearl, Causal inference in statistics: an overview. Stat. Surv. 3, 96–146 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. J. Pearl, Causality. Models, Reasoning and Inference, 2nd edn. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  41. K.R. Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Hutchinson, London, 1959)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. W.S. Robinson, The logical structure of analytic induction. Am. Sociol. Rev. 16(6), 812–818 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. D.B. Rubin, Bayesian inference for causal effects: The role of randomization. Ann. Stat. 6(1), 34–58 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. F. Russo, J. Williamson, Interpreting causality in the health sciences. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 21(2), 157–170 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. F. Russo, J. Williamson, Generic versus single-case causality: The case of autopsy. Eur. J. Philos. Sci. 1(1), 47–69 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. D.I.K. Sjøberg, T. Dybå, B.C.D. Anda, J.E. Hannay, Building theories in software engineering, in Guide to advanced empirical software engineering, ed. by F. Shull, J. Singer, D.I.K. Sjøberg (Springer, Heidelberg, 2008), pp. 312–336

    Google Scholar 

  47. P. Thagard, Explaining disease: correlations, causes, and mechanisms, in Explanation and Cognition, ed. by F.C. Keil, R.A. Wilson (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2000), pp. 255–276

    Google Scholar 

  48. R.J. Wieringa, M. Daneva, N. Condori-Fernandez, The structure of design theories, and an analysis of their use in software engineering experiments, in International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM) (IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos, 2011), pp. 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  49. J. Woodward, Making Things Happen. A Theory of Causal Explanation (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  50. J. Woodward, Causation and manipulability, in The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. by E.N. Zalta. Summer 2013 edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/encyclopedia/archinfo.cgi?entry=causation-mani

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wieringa, R.J. (2014). Scientific Theories. In: Design Science Methodology for Information Systems and Software Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43839-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-43838-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-43839-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics