Skip to main content

Allergic Contact Eczema and Atopic Eczema

  • Chapter
Handbook of Atopic Eczema

Abstract

Since Landsteiner and Chase used cell transfer experiments to demonstrate that the potential of eliciting allergic contact eczema resides in the mononuclear cell fraction of leucocytes, one must regard the allergic contact eczema as a manifestation of delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) [1, 2]. Later on, several other groups showed that the induction and elicitation of allergic contact eczema requires a complex interaction of multiple components. Various T-lymphocyte subpopulations and their products react with antigenpresenting cells which express HLA II antigens on their surface. In the epidermis, these are the Langerhans cells [3]. The sensitization phase includes the generation of T-helper and various types of regulatory T-suppressor lymphocytes which are specifically sensitized by per-cutaneously penetrating molecules of low molecular weight [4, 5]. The specificity is carried by CD4+ T-helper cells, as proven for nickel sensitivity [6]. After sensitization has occurred, any further cutaneous contact with the allergen will provoke the manifestation of an allergic contact eczema [7]. Immunologically, this represents the effector phase of cell-mediated immunity (CMI). Several investigators suggest a biphasic development of allergic contact eczema and consider the first part a mandatory prerequisite of the second. Within 4 h after contact with antigen, basophils which have been activated by T-cell factors invade the skin [8]. This specific “cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity” [9] is followed by an invasion with mononuclear cells, the vast majority of which are T cells without antigen specificity. It appears that a single antigen-specific helper cell is sufficient to initiate this late classic effector phase [10]. During this late phase of allergic contact eczema the kinetics of emigration and the phenotypic composition of the infiltrating cells cannot be distinguished from an irritant dermatitis [11].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Landsteiner K, Chase MW (1942) Experiments on transfer of cutaneous sensitivity to simple compounds. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 49: 688–690

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Baer RL (1986) The mechanism of allergic contact hypersensitivity. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sting! G, Katz SI, Clement L, Green I, Shevach EM (1978) Immunologic functions of Ia-bearing epidermal Langerhans cells. J Immunol 121: 2005–2013

    Google Scholar 

  4. Polak L (1978) Recent trends in the immunology of contact sensitivity. 1. Contact Dermatitis 4: 249–255

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Polak L (1978) Recent trends in the immunology of contact sensitivity. 2. Contact Dermatitis 4: 259–263

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silvennoinen-Kassinen S, Jakkula H, Karvonen J (1986) Helper cells (Leu-3a+) carry the specificity of nickel sensitivity reaction in vitro in humans. J Invest Dermatol 86: 18–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Knop J (1985) Immunologische Grundlagen des allergischen Kontakt-Ekzems. Hautarzt 35: 617–622

    Google Scholar 

  8. Askenase PW, van Loveren H (1983) Delayed-type hypersensitivity: activation of mast cells by antigen-specific T-cell factors initiates the cascade of cellular interactions. Immunol Today 4: 259–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dvorak HF, Dvorak AM, Simpson BA, Richerson HB, Leskowitz S, Karnovsky MJ (1970) Specificity of basophils and lymphocytes in cutaneous basophil hypersensitivity. J Immunol 114: 507–511

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marchal G, Seman M, Milon G, Trufa-Bachi P, Zilberfarb V (1982) Local adoptive transfer of skin delayed-type hypersensitivity initiated by a single T lymphocyte. J Immunol 129: 954–958

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Willis CM, Young E, Brandon DR, Wilkinson JD (1986) Immunopathological and ultrastructural findings in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 115: 305–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Levine BB, Ojeda A, Benacerraf B (1963) Studies on artificial antigens. III. The genetic control of the immune response to hapten-polyl-l-lysine conjugates in guinea pigs. J Exp Med 118: 953–957

    Google Scholar 

  13. Walker FB, Smith PD, Maibach HI (1967) Genetic factors in human allergic contact dermatitis. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 32: 453–462

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wise F, Sulzberger MB (1933) Editorial remarks. In: Yearbook of dermatology and syphilology. Yearbook Medical, Chicago, p 59

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rajka G (1975) Atopic dermatitis. In: Rook A (ed) Major problems in dermatology. Saunders, London, pp 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  16. McDevitt HO (1976) Genetic considerations in atopic and other dermatologic conditions. J Invest Dermatol 67: 320326

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T (1967) Identification of E antibodies as a carrier of reaginic activity. J Immunol 99: 11871198

    Google Scholar 

  18. Juhlin L, Johannson SGO, Bennich H, Högman C, Thyresson N (1969) Immunoglobulin E in dermatoses: levels in atopic dermatitis and urticaria. Arch Dermatol 100: 12–16

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gurevitch AW, Heiner DC, Reisner RM (1973) IgE in atopic dermatitis and other common dermatoses. Arch Dermatol 107: 712–715

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ishizaka K (1976) Cellular events in the IgE antibody response. Adv Immunol 23: 1–75

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tada T (1975) Regulation of reaginic antibody formation in animals. Prog Allergy 19: 122–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Geha RS, Reinherz EL, Leung D, McKee KT, Schlossman S, Rosen FS (1981) Deficiency of suppressor T cells in the hyperimmunoglobulin E syndrome. J Clin Invest 67: 783791

    Google Scholar 

  23. Pene J, Rousset F, Briere F, Chretien I, Paliard X, Banchereau J, Spits H, De Vries JE (1988) IgE production by normal human B cells induced by alloreactive cell clones is mediated by Il-4 and suppressed by IFN-g. J Immunol 141: 1218–1224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Del Prete G, Maggi E, Parronchi P, Chretien I, Tin A, Macchia D, Ricci M, Banchereau J, De Vries J, Romagnani S (1988) Il-4 is an essential factor for the IgE synthesis induced in vitro by human T cell clones and their supernatants. J Immunol 140: 4193–4198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarfati M, Rector E, Wong K, Rubio Trujillo M, Sehon AH, Delespesse G (1984) In vitro synthesis of IgE by human lymphocytes. II. Enhancement of the spontaneous IgE synthesis of IgE binding factors secreted by RPMI 8866 lymphoblastoid B cells. Immunology 53: 197–202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tong AKF, Mihm MC Jr. (1986) The pathology of atopic dermatitis. Clin Rev Allergy 4: 27–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Brynzeel-Koomen C, vanWichen DF, Toonstra J, Berrens L, Brynzeel PLB (1986) The presence of IgE molecules on epidermal Langerhans cells in patients with atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol Res 278: 199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barker JWN, Alegre VA, MacDonald DM (1988) Surface- bound immunoglobulin E on antigen-presenting cells in cutaneous tissue of atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 90: 117–121

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hanifin JM, Lobitz WC Jr (1977) Newer concepts of atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 113: 663–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jones HE, Reinhardt JH, Rinaldi M (1973) A clinical, mycologic and immunologic survey on dermatophytosis. Arch Dermatol 108: 61–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Räsänen L, Lehto M, Reunala T, Jansen C, Lehtinen M, Leinikki P (1987) Langerhans cell-and T-lymphocyte functions in patients with atopic dermatitis with disseminated cutaneous herpes simplex virus infections. J Invest Dermatol 89: 15–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajka G (1967) Delayed dermal and epidermal reactivity in topic dermatitis (prurigo Besnier). I. Delayed reactivity to bacterial and mold allergens. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 47: 158–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Forsbeck M, Hovmark A, Skog E (1976) Patch testing, tuberculin testing and sensitization with dinitro chlorobenzene and nitrosodimethylanilini of patients with atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 56: 135–138

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Palacios J, Fuller EW, Blaylock WK (1966) Immunologcal capabilities of patients with atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 487: 484–490

    Google Scholar 

  35. Byrom NA, Timlin DA (1979) Immune status in atopic eczema: a survey, Br J Dermatol 100: 491–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Schöpf E (1974) Störung zellvermittelter Immunreaktionen bei Neurodermitis atopica. Dermatologica 149: 210–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Leung DYM, Rhodes AR, Geha RS (1981) Enumeration of T cell subsets in atopic dermatitis using monoclonal antibodies. J Allergy Clin Immunol 67: 450–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Fulton R, Thivolet J, Garcier F, Gaucherand M (1981) Les sous populations de lymphocytes T helper et suppressor studies par les anticorps monoclonaux dans diversies dermatoses. Ann Dermatol Venereol 108: 243–250

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Schuster DL, Person D, Bonjiovanni B, Levisas AI (1979) Suppressor cell function in atopic dermatitis associated with elevated immunoglobulin E. J Allergy Clin Immunol 64: 139–145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Leung DYM, Saryan YA, Frankel R, Lareau, Geha RS (1983) Impairment of the autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction in atopic dermatitis. J Clin Invest 72: 14821486

    Google Scholar 

  41. Bovbjerg DH, Wang VA, Schwab R, Lebenger KS, Siskind GW, Weksler ME (1985) Lymphocyte transformation induced by autologous cells XVII. Lower autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction in subjects with a history of hay fever. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 78: 332–334

    Google Scholar 

  42. Dirienzo W, Bagnasco M, Caria M, Chimini G, Ciprandi G, Ferrini S, Canonica GW (1984) Activation of T lymphocytes and autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction in allergic patients. Allergy 53: 272–277

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Smolen JS, ChusedTM, Novotny EA, Steinberg AD (1982) The human autologous mixed lymphocyte reaction. J Immunol 129: 1050–1053

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Leung DYM, Wood SN, Dubey D, Rhodes AR, Geha RS (1983) Cellular basis of defective cell-mediated lympholysis in atopic dermatitis. J Immunol 130: 1687–1692

    Google Scholar 

  45. Morimoto C, Letvin NL, Distaso JA, Aldrich WR, Schlossman SF (1985) The isolation and characterization of the human suppressor T cell subset. J Immunol 134: 15081515

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sauder DN (1984) Epidermal cytokines: properties of epidermal cell thymocyte-activating factor (ETAF). Lymphokine Res 3: 145–151

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Mizoguchi M, Furusawa S, Okitsu S, Yoshino K (1985) Allergic Contact Eczema and Atopic Eczema 105 Macrophage-derived interleukin-1 activity in atopic dermatitis (abstract). J Invest Dermatol [Suppl] 85: 155s - 160s

    Google Scholar 

  48. Stüttgen G (1977) Die Ekzemgenese aus pathophysiologischer Sicht. Z Hautkr [Suppl 2] 52: 8–15

    Google Scholar 

  49. Frosch PJ (1985) Hautirritation und empfindliche Haut. Grosse, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  50. Jones HE, Lewis CW, McMarlin SL (1973) Allergic contact sensitivity in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermato1107: 217–222

    Google Scholar 

  51. Skog E (1960) Primary irritant and allergic eczematous reactions induced in patients with different dermatoses. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 40: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

  52. Hanifin JM Rajka G (1980) Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl] (Stockh) 92: 44–47

    Google Scholar 

  53. Fisher AA (1986) Contact dermatitis in atopic individuals. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 133

    Google Scholar 

  54. Fischer T, Rystedt I (1985) False-positive, follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis 12: 93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Rostenberg A Jr, Sulzberger MB (1937) Some results of patch tests: compilation and discussion of cutaneous reactions to about 500 different substances as elicited by over 10 000 tests in approximately 1000 patients. Arch Dermatol Syph 35: 433–454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Skog E, Thyresson N (1953) The occupational significance of some common contact allergens. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 33: 65–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Cronin E, Bandmann H-J, Calnan CD, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Magnusson B, Maibach HI, Malten K, Meneghini CL, Pirilä V, Wilkinson DS (1970) Contact dermatitis in the atopic. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 50: 183–187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Marghescu S (1985) Patch test reactions in atopic patients. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 114: 113–116

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Blondeel A, Achten G, Dooms-Goossens A, Buekens P, Buekens P, Broeck W, Oleffe J (1987) Atopie allergie de contact. Ann Dermatol Venereol 114: 203–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Bandmann H-J, Agathos M (1980) Die atopische Hand-dermatitis. Dermatosen 28: 110–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Breit R, Leutgeb C, Bandmann H-J (1972) Zum neurodermitischen Handekzem. Arch Dermatol Forsch 244: 353–354

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Bäurle G, Hornstein OP, Diepgen TL (1985) Professionelle Handekzeme und Atopie. Dermatosen 33: 161–165

    Google Scholar 

  63. Agrub G (1969) Hand eczema and other hand dermatoses in south Sweden. Acta Derm Venereol [Suppl 61] 49: 1–91

    Google Scholar 

  64. Schwanitz H-J (1988) Atopic palmoplantar eczema. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  65. Shumunes E, Keil J (1984) The role of atopy in occupational dermatoses. Contact Dermatitis 11: 174–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Glickman FS, Silvers SH (1967) Hand eczema and atopy in housewives. Arch Dermatol 95: 487–489

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Carr RD, Berke M, Becker SW (1964) Incidence of atopy in the general population. Arch Dermatol 89: 87–92

    Google Scholar 

  68. Foussereau J, Cavelier C (1978) Toxische Dermatitis und Pseudo-Kontaktallergie. Dermatosen 26: 156–161

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Fisher AA (1986) The role of patch testing. In: Fisher AA (ed) Contact dermatitis, 3rd edn. Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  70. Blaylock WK (1976) Atopic dermatitis: diagnosis and pathobiology. J Allergy Clin Immunol 57: 62–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Dobson R (1963) Discussion on Vandenberg and Epstein: experimental nickel contact sensitization. J Invest Dermatol 41: 416

    Google Scholar 

  72. Prystowsky SD, Allen AM, Odon RB, Akers WA (1979) Allergic contact hypersensitivity to nickel, neomycin, ethylenediamine and benzocaine. Arch Dermatol 115: 959962

    Google Scholar 

  73. Kunz B, Ring J, Überla K (1990) Frequency of contact dermatitis and contact sensitization in preschool children (abstract). Arch Dermatol Res 281: 544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. North American Contact Dermatitis Group (1973) Epidemiology of contact dermatitis in North America 1972. Arch Dermatol 108: 537–540

    Google Scholar 

  75. Calnan CD (1956) Nickel dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 68: 229–236

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Caron GA (1964) Nickel sensitivity and atopy. Br J Dermatol 76: 384–387

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Malten KE (1971) Nickel-allergic contact dermatitis. Dermatologica 142: 113–116

    Google Scholar 

  78. Wahlberg JE, Skog E (1971) Nickel allergy and atopy. Threshold of nickel sensitivity and immunoglobulin E determination. Br J Dermatol 85: 97–104

    Google Scholar 

  79. Pürschel W, Ditrich 0 (1989) Neurodermitis atopica und Kontaktallergie. Allergologie 12: 203–208

    Google Scholar 

  80. Breit R (1981) Positive Epicutantestreaktionen bei Dermatitis atopica. Hautarzt [Suppl V] 32: 147–148

    Google Scholar 

  81. Wahlberg JE, Maibach HJ (1981) Sterile cutaneous pustules: a manifestation of primary irritancy. Identification of contact pustulogens. J Invest Dermatol 76: 381383

    Google Scholar 

  82. Wilson HTH (1955) Standard patch tests in eczema and dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 67: 291–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Epstein S, Mohajerin AH (1964) Incidence of contact sensitivity in atopic dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 90: 284–287

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Epstein S (1965) Neomycin sensitivity and atopy. Dermatologica 130: 280–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  85. Magnusson B, Fregert S, Hjorth N, Hovding G, Pirilä V, Skog E (1969) Routine patch testing. 5th report by the Scandinavian Committee for Standardisation of Routine Patch Testing. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 49: 556–563

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  86. Tuft LA (1949) Importance of inhalant allergens in atopic dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 12: 211–219

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Platts-Mills TAE, Mitchell EB, Rowntree S, Chapman MD, Wilkins SR (1983) The role of dust mite allergens in atopic dermatitis. Clin Exp Dermatol 8: 233–247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  88. Reitamo S, Visa K, Kähönen K, Käyhkö, Stubb S, Salo OP (1986) Eczematous reactions in atopic patients caused by epicutaneous testing with inhalant allergens. Br J Dermatol 114: 303–309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  89. Strauss JS, Kligman AM (1956) The relationship of atopic allergy and dermatitis. Arch Dermatol 75: 806–811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Schultz Larsen F, Holm NV, Henningsen K (1986) Atopic dermatitis. A genetic-epidemiologic study in a population-based twin sample. J Am Acad Dermatol 15: 487–494

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neumann, C., Marghescu, S. (1991). Allergic Contact Eczema and Atopic Eczema. In: Ruzicka, T., Ring, J., Przybilla, B. (eds) Handbook of Atopic Eczema. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02671-7_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02671-7_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-02673-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02671-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics