Skip to main content

Abstract

In today’s age of digital transformation, e-learning, as a new paradigm of distance education, has become increasingly popular and, at the same time, has created the opportunity to facilitate the delivery of useful information to relevant audiences. The article at hand presents the CONTESSA Online Modules Courseware (COMC) as an example of an e-learning course which seeks to provide this delivery of information to its relevant audience, namely twenty-first century, student-centered teaching and learning principles to pre- and in-service teachers in Cambodia and Sri Lanka.

Besides introducing the COMC’s design, storyboard development, and the development of the courseware prototype, the results of the testing phase of this course are presented in this article. Based on the usability evaluation methods for e-learning created by (Zaharias & Poylymenakou, International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 25:75–98, 2009), the available testing results offer insights into the capabilities as well as deficiencies of the COMC and subsequently allow for a further advancement of the COMC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This project has been funded with support from the European Union. This article reflects the view only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Project n.: 598756-EPP-1-2018-1-AT-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

References

This project has been funded with support from the European Union. This article reflects the view only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Project n.: 598756-EPP-1-2018-1-AT-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP

  • Baldiņš, A. (2016). Insight Into E-Pedagogy Concept Development. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 231, 251–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boone, D., & Boone, H. (2012). Analyzing Likert Data. The Journal of Extension, 50(2).https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/joe/vol50/iss2/48

  • Faghih, B., Azadehfar, M. R., & Katebi, S. D. (2013). User Interface Design for E-Learning Software. The International Journal of Soft Computing and Software Engineering, 3(3), 786–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis (5. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241–11. (1998). Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals, Part11: Guidance on usability.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junus, I. S., Santoso, H. B., Isal, R. Y. K., & Utomo, A. Y. (2015). Usability Evaluation of the Student Centered e-Learning Environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Koohang, A. (2004). Expanding the Concept of Usability. Informing Science: The International Journal of an Emerging Transdiscipline, 7, 129–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koohang, A., & du Plessis, J. (2004). Architecting Usability Properties in the E-Learning Instructional Design Process. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(3), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 7(1), 57–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marreez, Y. M. A. H., Wells, M., Eisen, A., Rosenberg, L., Park, D., Schaller, F., et al. (2013). Towards Integrating Basic and Clinical Sciences: Our Experience at Touro University Nevada. Medical Science Educator, 23(4), 595–606. Retrieved from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF03341687

  • Miami University of Ohio (2004). Usability Testing: Developing Useful and Usable Products. https://docplayer.net/11473799-Usability-testing-developing-useful-and-usable-products.html

  • Nielsen, J. (2012a). How Many Test Users in a Usability Study? NNGroup. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/how-many-test-users/

  • Nielsen, J. (2012b). Usability 101: Introduction to Usability. NNGroup. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

  • Nichols, M. (2008). E-Primer Series: E-learning in Context. Wellington, New Zealand: Laidlaw College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sales Júnior, F. M., Ramos, M. A. S., Pinho, A. L. S., & Santa Rosa, J. G. (2016). Pedagogical Usability: A Theoretical Essay for E-Learning. Holos, 32(1), 3-15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (2002). Information and Communication Technologies in Teacher Education: A Planning Guide. Unesco. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/in/documentViewer.xhtml

  • UNESCO. (2016). ICT Standards and Competencies from the Pedagogical Dimension: A Perspective from Levels of ICT Adoption in Teachers’ Education Practice. UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wentling, T. L., Waight, C., Gallaher, J., La Fleur, J., Wang, C., & Kanfer, A. (2000). E-learning - A Review of Literature. Researchgate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331938876_E-learning_A_review_of_literature

  • Yang, J., Pan, H., Zhou, W., & Huang, R. (2018). Evaluation of Smart Classroom from the Perspective of Infusing Technology into Pedagogy. Smart Learning Environments, 5(20).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharias, P. (2009). Usability on the Context of e-Learning: A Framework Augmenting ‘Traditional’ Usability Constructs with Instructional Design and Motivation to Learn. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 5(4), 38-61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaharias, P., & Poulymenakou, A. (2005). Implementing the Learner-Centered Design Paradigm for Web-Based Training Curricula. In P. Nicholson (Ed.), International Federation for Information Processing: Vol. 167. E-train practices for professional organizations. IFIP TC3/WG3.3 Fifth Working Conference on eTRAIN Practices for Professional Organizations (eTRAIN 2003), July 7–11, 2003, Pori, Finland (pp. 325–332). Kluwer Acad. Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharias, P., & Poylymenakou, A. (2009). Developing a Usability Evaluation Method for e-Learning Applications: Beyond Functional Usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 25(1), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orkhan Jalilov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brodacz-Geier, M., Jalilov, O., Köhler, T., Perera, W.L. (2024). The Development and Implementation of an E-Learning Course: A Usability Study in South Asia. In: Hummel, S. (eds) Empowering Education in Cambodia and Sri Lanka: Quality Improvement in Teaching and Learning in the 21st Century. Doing Higher Education. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43306-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43306-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43305-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43306-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics