Skip to main content

Das politische System Kasachstans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die politischen Systeme Zentralasiens
  • 1353 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag widmet sich der Entwicklung Kasachstans seit der Unabhängigkeit im Jahr 1991. Er legt einen Schwerpunkt auf die Macht- und Herrschaftsstrukturen des autoritären Systems, die stark durch den Ressourcenexport geprägt sind. Das Regime in Kasachstan hat bislang die Entstehung oppositioneller politischer und sozialer Bewegungen verhindert. Erst in jüngster Zeit zeichnet sich die Entstehung einer neuartigen Protestbewegung und -kultur ab. Der Beitrag behandelt auch die Themenfelder Repression, Wirtschafts- und Außenpolitik sowie gesellschaftlichen Wandel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Abdurasulov, Abdujalil. 2018. Speaking up about rape in conservative Kazakhstan. BBC news. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43247005. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • AFP. 2019. Kazakh police arrest activist who campaigned for human rights in Xinjiang. The Guardian, 11.03.2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/11/kazakh-police-arrest-activist-who-campaigned-for-human-rights-in-xinjiang. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Agrawal, Pradeep. 2007. Economic growth and poverty reduction. Evidence from Kazakhstan. Asian Development Review 24 (2): 90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, Max. 2014. Democracy Promotion and Authoritarian Diffusion. The Foreign Origins of Post-Soviet Election Laws. Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1350–1370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissenova, Alima. 2016. Building a Muslim Nation. The Role of the Central Mosque of Astana. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. Marlène Laruelle, 211–228. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, Alexander, und J.C. Sharman. 2015. Blurring the line between licit and illicit. Transnational corruption networks in Central Asia and beyond. Central Asian Survey 34 (1): 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dave, Bhavna. 2007. Kazakhstan – Ethnicity, Language and Power. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Sordi, Adele. 2018. Sponsoring student mobility for development and authoritarian stability: Kazakhstan’s Bolashak programme. Globalizations 15 (2): 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, Alexander C. 2016. Imagining Kazakhstani-stan: Negotiations of Homeland and Titular-Nationality. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. M. Laruelle, 131–154. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrich-Bakenova, Saule. 2009. Trajectory of civil service development in Kazakhstan. Nexus of politics and administration. Governance 22 (4), 717–745.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eschment, Beate. 2007. Elitenrekrutierung in Kasachstan. Nationalität, Klan, Region, Generation. Osteuropa (8-9): 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2019). Trade in goods with Kazakhstan. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_kazakhstan_en.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Franke, Anja, Andrea Gawrich, und Gurban Alakbarov. 2009. Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as post-Soviet rentier states: resource incomes and autocracy as a double ‘curse’ in post-Soviet regimes. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (1): 109–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frieß, Nina. 2019. Kasachstanische Märchen – ein literarisches Identitätsangebot für alle Kasachstaner*innen. ZOiS Report. https://www.zois-berlin.de/fileadmin/media/Dateien/ZOiS_Reports/ZOiS_Report_1_2019.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Coppenrath, Florian. (2020). Pop in Zentralasien [Podcast]. In O. Glas, und E. Schlager (Moderatoren), Shashlyk Mashlyk 3/2020. https://shashlyk.de/episode/shashlyk-mashlyk-03-pop-in-zentralasien. Zugegriffen: 29.01.2020.

  • Grzymala-Busse, A., und Pauline J. Luong. 2002. Reconceptualizing the State. Lessons from Post-Communism. Politics & Society 30 (4): 529–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, Aandreas, und Heiko Pleines, Hrsg. 2012. Challenges of the Caspian resource boom: Domestic elites and policy-making. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilkhamov, Alisher. 2007. Neopatrimonialism, interest groups and patronage networks. The impasses of the governance system in Uzbekistan. In: Central Asian Survey 26 (1): 65–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, Rico. 2013. Nur Otan, Informal Networks and the Countering of Elite Instability in Kazakhstan. Bringing the ‘Formal’ Back In. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (6): 1055–1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, Rico, und Sarah Whitmore. 2014. The limited agency and life-cycles of personalized dominant parties in the post-Soviet space. The cases of United Russia and Nur Otan. Democratization 21 (4): 699–721.

    Google Scholar 

  • Junisbai, Barbara, und Azamat Junisbai. 2005. The Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan: A Case Study in Economic Liberalization, Intraelite Cleavage, and Political Opposition. Demokratizatsiya 13 (3): 373–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassenova, Nargis. 2018. Kazakhstan: Islamic Revival and Trajectories of State-Society Relations. In Religion, conflict, and stability in the former Soviet Union, Hrsg. K. Migacheva, und B. Frederick, 115-138. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjærnet, Heidi, Dosym Satpaev, und Stina Torjesen. 2008. Big business and high-level politics in Kazakhstan. An everlasting symbiosis? China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 6 (1): 95–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolonka, Asem Z. 2019. Kak kazahskij stal jazykom gorodskih subkul‘tur i ulichnogo iskusstva [Wie kasachisch die Sprache städtischer Subkultur und Straßenkunst wurde]. The Village Казахстан. https://www.the-village.kz/village/city/columns/6913-kak-kazahskiy-stal-yazykom-gorodskih-subkultur-i-ulichnogo-iskusstva. Zugegriffen: 29.01.2020.

  • Krivosheev, Denis. 2016. Poterjannye milliardy [Verlorene Milliarden]. Informburo. https://informburo.kz/mneniya/denis-krivosheev/poteryannye-milliardy.html. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Kubicek, Paul. 2019. Islamist Political Orientations among Central Asian Youth. Europe-Asia Studies 71 (5): 1-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kudaibergenova, Diana T. 2016. The Use and Abuse of Postcolonial Discourses in Post-independent Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (5): 917-935.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumenov, Almaz. 2019. Kazakhstan: Consensus-building council already generates grumbling. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-consensus-building-council-already-generates-grumbling. Zugegriffen: 16.08.2019.

  • Kumenov, Almaz. 2020. Kazakhstan: Parliament decriminalizes slander, but leaves penalties in place. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-parliament-decriminalizes-slander-but-leaves-penalties-in-place. Zugegriffen: 12.06.2020.

  • Laruelle, Marlène. 2008. Kazakhstan, the new country of immigration for Central Asian workers. Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst 10 (9): 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, Marlène. 2016a. Which Future for National-Patriots? The Landscape of Kazakh Nationalism. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. M. Laruelle, 155-180. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 2016. Blogging Zhanaozen. Hegemonic discourse and authoritarian resilience in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey 35 (3): 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillis, Joana. 2019. Kazakhstan: Waking up to reform. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-waking-up-to-reform. Zugegriffen: 16.08.2019.

  • Luong, Pauline J., und Erica Weinthal. 1999. The NGO paradox: Democratic goals and non-democratic outcomes in Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies 51 (7): 1267–1284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maerz, Seraphine F. 2016. The electronic face of authoritarianism. E-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes. Government Information Quarterly 33 (4): 727–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maltseva, Elena, und Saltanat. Janenova. 2018. Reversing pension privatization in Kazakhstan. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---soc_sec/documents/publication/wcms_648633.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Marat, Erica 2009. Nation branding in Central Asia. A new campaign to present ideas about the state and the nation. Europe-Asia Studies, 61 (7), (S. 1123–1136).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, Tom. 2019. Saudi Arabia and Russia among 37 states backing China’s Xinjiang policy. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-rights/saudi-arabia-and-russia-among-37-states-backing-chinas-xinjiang-policy-idUSKCN1U721X. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Murphy, Jonathan. 2006. Illusory transition? Elite reconstitution in Kazakhstan, 1989–2002. Europe-Asia Studies 58 (4): 523–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obydenkova, Anastassia V., und Alexander Libman. 2019. Authoritarian regionalism in the world of international organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omelicheva, Mariya Y. 2016. Authoritarian legitimation. Assessing discourses of legitimacy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Central Asian Survey 35 (4): 481–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, Martin, und Richard Pomfret. 2018. Agricultural Policies in Kazakhstan. In Policies for agricultural markets and rural economic activity, Hrsg. W. H. Meyers und T. G. Johnson, 461-482. New Jersey: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podrobno. 2019. Kazahstanskij Tenge Bank nachnet rabotu v Uzbekistane uzhe v ijune 2019 goda [Die kasachstanische Tenge Bank startet in Usbekistan bereits im Juni 2019]. Podrobno. https://podrobno.uz/cat/economic/kazakhstanskiy-tenge-bank-nachnet-rabotu-v-uzbekistane/. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.

  • Pomfret, Richard. 2019. The Central Asian Economies in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickelton, Chris. 2019. Kazakhstan embraces facial recognition, civil society recoils. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-embraces-facial-recognition-civil-society-recoils. Zugegriffen: 17.10.2019.

  • Schatz, Edward. 2004. What Capital Cities Say About State and Nation Building. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9 (4): 111–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Edward. 2005. Reconceptualizing clans: Kinship networks and statehood in Kazakhstan. Nationalities Papers 33 (2): 231–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatz, Edward. 2009. The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Comparative Politics 41 (2): 203–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiek, Sebastian. 2014. Widersprüchliche Staatsbildung – Kasachstans konservative Modernisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiek, Sebastian 2019. Kasachstans autoritäre Partizipationspolitik. SWP Studie 20. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, Aandrea 2003. Elitenwandel und politische Dynamik in Kasachstan. SWP-Studie 39. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevisani, Tommaso. 2018. Work, Precarity, and Resistance: Company and Contract Labor in Kazakhstan’s Former Soviet Steel Town. In Industrial labor on the margins of capitalism. Precarity, class, and the neoliberal subject, Hrsg. C. M. Hann und J. P. Parry, 85-110. New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutumlu, Assel (2016). The Rule by Law, Negotiating Stability in Kazakhstan. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. Marlène Laruelle, 3-28. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Schiek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiek, S. (2020). Das politische System Kasachstans. In: Lempp, J., Mayer, S., Brand, A. (eds) Die politischen Systeme Zentralasiens. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31633-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31633-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31632-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31633-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics