Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag widmet sich der Entwicklung Kasachstans seit der Unabhängigkeit im Jahr 1991. Er legt einen Schwerpunkt auf die Macht- und Herrschaftsstrukturen des autoritären Systems, die stark durch den Ressourcenexport geprägt sind. Das Regime in Kasachstan hat bislang die Entstehung oppositioneller politischer und sozialer Bewegungen verhindert. Erst in jüngster Zeit zeichnet sich die Entstehung einer neuartigen Protestbewegung und -kultur ab. Der Beitrag behandelt auch die Themenfelder Repression, Wirtschafts- und Außenpolitik sowie gesellschaftlichen Wandel.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
Abdurasulov, Abdujalil. 2018. Speaking up about rape in conservative Kazakhstan. BBC news. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-43247005. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
AFP. 2019. Kazakh police arrest activist who campaigned for human rights in Xinjiang. The Guardian, 11.03.2019. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/11/kazakh-police-arrest-activist-who-campaigned-for-human-rights-in-xinjiang. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Agrawal, Pradeep. 2007. Economic growth and poverty reduction. Evidence from Kazakhstan. Asian Development Review 24 (2): 90.
Bader, Max. 2014. Democracy Promotion and Authoritarian Diffusion. The Foreign Origins of Post-Soviet Election Laws. Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1350–1370.
Bissenova, Alima. 2016. Building a Muslim Nation. The Role of the Central Mosque of Astana. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. Marlène Laruelle, 211–228. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Cooley, Alexander, und J.C. Sharman. 2015. Blurring the line between licit and illicit. Transnational corruption networks in Central Asia and beyond. Central Asian Survey 34 (1): 11–28.
Dave, Bhavna. 2007. Kazakhstan – Ethnicity, Language and Power. London: Routledge.
Del Sordi, Adele. 2018. Sponsoring student mobility for development and authoritarian stability: Kazakhstan’s Bolashak programme. Globalizations 15 (2): 215–231.
Diener, Alexander C. 2016. Imagining Kazakhstani-stan: Negotiations of Homeland and Titular-Nationality. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. M. Laruelle, 131–154. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Emrich-Bakenova, Saule. 2009. Trajectory of civil service development in Kazakhstan. Nexus of politics and administration. Governance 22 (4), 717–745.
Eschment, Beate. 2007. Elitenrekrutierung in Kasachstan. Nationalität, Klan, Region, Generation. Osteuropa (8-9): 175–193.
European Union (2019). Trade in goods with Kazakhstan. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/isdb_results/factsheets/country/details_kazakhstan_en.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Franke, Anja, Andrea Gawrich, und Gurban Alakbarov. 2009. Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan as post-Soviet rentier states: resource incomes and autocracy as a double ‘curse’ in post-Soviet regimes. Europe-Asia Studies 61 (1): 109–140.
Frieß, Nina. 2019. Kasachstanische Märchen – ein literarisches Identitätsangebot für alle Kasachstaner*innen. ZOiS Report. https://www.zois-berlin.de/fileadmin/media/Dateien/ZOiS_Reports/ZOiS_Report_1_2019.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Coppenrath, Florian. (2020). Pop in Zentralasien [Podcast]. In O. Glas, und E. Schlager (Moderatoren), Shashlyk Mashlyk 3/2020. https://shashlyk.de/episode/shashlyk-mashlyk-03-pop-in-zentralasien. Zugegriffen: 29.01.2020.
Grzymala-Busse, A., und Pauline J. Luong. 2002. Reconceptualizing the State. Lessons from Post-Communism. Politics & Society 30 (4): 529–554.
Heinrich, Aandreas, und Heiko Pleines, Hrsg. 2012. Challenges of the Caspian resource boom: Domestic elites and policy-making. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ilkhamov, Alisher. 2007. Neopatrimonialism, interest groups and patronage networks. The impasses of the governance system in Uzbekistan. In: Central Asian Survey 26 (1): 65–84.
Isaacs, Rico. 2013. Nur Otan, Informal Networks and the Countering of Elite Instability in Kazakhstan. Bringing the ‘Formal’ Back In. Europe-Asia Studies 65 (6): 1055–1079.
Isaacs, Rico, und Sarah Whitmore. 2014. The limited agency and life-cycles of personalized dominant parties in the post-Soviet space. The cases of United Russia and Nur Otan. Democratization 21 (4): 699–721.
Junisbai, Barbara, und Azamat Junisbai. 2005. The Democratic Choice of Kazakhstan: A Case Study in Economic Liberalization, Intraelite Cleavage, and Political Opposition. Demokratizatsiya 13 (3): 373–292.
Kassenova, Nargis. 2018. Kazakhstan: Islamic Revival and Trajectories of State-Society Relations. In Religion, conflict, and stability in the former Soviet Union, Hrsg. K. Migacheva, und B. Frederick, 115-138. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.
Kjærnet, Heidi, Dosym Satpaev, und Stina Torjesen. 2008. Big business and high-level politics in Kazakhstan. An everlasting symbiosis? China and Eurasia Forum Quarterly 6 (1): 95–107.
Kolonka, Asem Z. 2019. Kak kazahskij stal jazykom gorodskih subkul‘tur i ulichnogo iskusstva [Wie kasachisch die Sprache städtischer Subkultur und Straßenkunst wurde]. The Village Казахстан. https://www.the-village.kz/village/city/columns/6913-kak-kazahskiy-stal-yazykom-gorodskih-subkultur-i-ulichnogo-iskusstva. Zugegriffen: 29.01.2020.
Krivosheev, Denis. 2016. Poterjannye milliardy [Verlorene Milliarden]. Informburo. https://informburo.kz/mneniya/denis-krivosheev/poteryannye-milliardy.html. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Kubicek, Paul. 2019. Islamist Political Orientations among Central Asian Youth. Europe-Asia Studies 71 (5): 1-16.
Kudaibergenova, Diana T. 2016. The Use and Abuse of Postcolonial Discourses in Post-independent Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies 68 (5): 917-935.
Kumenov, Almaz. 2019. Kazakhstan: Consensus-building council already generates grumbling. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-consensus-building-council-already-generates-grumbling. Zugegriffen: 16.08.2019.
Kumenov, Almaz. 2020. Kazakhstan: Parliament decriminalizes slander, but leaves penalties in place. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-parliament-decriminalizes-slander-but-leaves-penalties-in-place. Zugegriffen: 12.06.2020.
Laruelle, Marlène. 2008. Kazakhstan, the new country of immigration for Central Asian workers. Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst 10 (9): 6–8.
Laruelle, Marlène. 2016a. Which Future for National-Patriots? The Landscape of Kazakh Nationalism. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. M. Laruelle, 155-180. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lewis, David. 2016. Blogging Zhanaozen. Hegemonic discourse and authoritarian resilience in Kazakhstan. Central Asian Survey 35 (3): 421–438.
Lillis, Joana. 2019. Kazakhstan: Waking up to reform. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-waking-up-to-reform. Zugegriffen: 16.08.2019.
Luong, Pauline J., und Erica Weinthal. 1999. The NGO paradox: Democratic goals and non-democratic outcomes in Kazakhstan. Europe-Asia Studies 51 (7): 1267–1284.
Maerz, Seraphine F. 2016. The electronic face of authoritarianism. E-government as a tool for gaining legitimacy in competitive and non-competitive regimes. Government Information Quarterly 33 (4): 727–735.
Maltseva, Elena, und Saltanat. Janenova. 2018. Reversing pension privatization in Kazakhstan. ILO. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_protect/---soc_sec/documents/publication/wcms_648633.pdf. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Marat, Erica 2009. Nation branding in Central Asia. A new campaign to present ideas about the state and the nation. Europe-Asia Studies, 61 (7), (S. 1123–1136).
Miles, Tom. 2019. Saudi Arabia and Russia among 37 states backing China’s Xinjiang policy. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-china-xinjiang-rights/saudi-arabia-and-russia-among-37-states-backing-chinas-xinjiang-policy-idUSKCN1U721X. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Murphy, Jonathan. 2006. Illusory transition? Elite reconstitution in Kazakhstan, 1989–2002. Europe-Asia Studies 58 (4): 523–554.
Obydenkova, Anastassia V., und Alexander Libman. 2019. Authoritarian regionalism in the world of international organizations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Omelicheva, Mariya Y. 2016. Authoritarian legitimation. Assessing discourses of legitimacy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Central Asian Survey 35 (4): 481–500.
Petrick, Martin, und Richard Pomfret. 2018. Agricultural Policies in Kazakhstan. In Policies for agricultural markets and rural economic activity, Hrsg. W. H. Meyers und T. G. Johnson, 461-482. New Jersey: World Scientific.
Podrobno. 2019. Kazahstanskij Tenge Bank nachnet rabotu v Uzbekistane uzhe v ijune 2019 goda [Die kasachstanische Tenge Bank startet in Usbekistan bereits im Juni 2019]. Podrobno. https://podrobno.uz/cat/economic/kazakhstanskiy-tenge-bank-nachnet-rabotu-v-uzbekistane/. Zugegriffen: 17.08.2019.
Pomfret, Richard. 2019. The Central Asian Economies in the Twenty-First Century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rickelton, Chris. 2019. Kazakhstan embraces facial recognition, civil society recoils. Eurasianet. https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-embraces-facial-recognition-civil-society-recoils. Zugegriffen: 17.10.2019.
Schatz, Edward. 2004. What Capital Cities Say About State and Nation Building. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 9 (4): 111–140.
Schatz, Edward. 2005. Reconceptualizing clans: Kinship networks and statehood in Kazakhstan. Nationalities Papers 33 (2): 231–254.
Schatz, Edward. 2009. The soft authoritarian tool kit: Agenda-setting power in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Comparative Politics 41 (2): 203–222.
Schiek, Sebastian. 2014. Widersprüchliche Staatsbildung – Kasachstans konservative Modernisierung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Schiek, Sebastian 2019. Kasachstans autoritäre Partizipationspolitik. SWP Studie 20. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik
Schmitz, Aandrea 2003. Elitenwandel und politische Dynamik in Kasachstan. SWP-Studie 39. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
Trevisani, Tommaso. 2018. Work, Precarity, and Resistance: Company and Contract Labor in Kazakhstan’s Former Soviet Steel Town. In Industrial labor on the margins of capitalism. Precarity, class, and the neoliberal subject, Hrsg. C. M. Hann und J. P. Parry, 85-110. New York: Berghahn Books.
Tutumlu, Assel (2016). The Rule by Law, Negotiating Stability in Kazakhstan. In Kazakhstan in the making. Legitimacy, symbols, and social changes, Hrsg. Marlène Laruelle, 3-28. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schiek, S. (2020). Das politische System Kasachstans. In: Lempp, J., Mayer, S., Brand, A. (eds) Die politischen Systeme Zentralasiens. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31633-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31633-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31632-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31633-4
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)