Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Responsible Innovation - Entrepreneurship Nexus

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Responsible Entrepreneurship

Zusammenfassung

This article connects the concept of responsible innovation to entrepreneurship research. To unite the two domains, we illustrate responsible innovation as a composition of three aspects - designing innovation, normative ends and collaborative reflection - and connect these with entrepreneurship research. We furthermore outline a theoretical framework of how to integrate normative ends and collaborative reflection into the entrepreneurial process which we understand as the design process transforming opportunity into innovation. The article emphasizes the potential of collaboration to take normative aspects into account making the entrepreneurial process more inclusive and outcome more sustainable and societal desirable by moderating the process. Due to its epistemological interest, the article also contributes to the discussion on the operationalization of responsible innovation and its relation to the concept of sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Arthurs, Jonathan D.; Busenitz, Lowell W. (2003): The Boundaries and Limitations of Agency Theory and Stewardship Theory in the Venture Capitalist/Entrepreneur Relationship*. In Ent. Theory & Pract 28 (2), pp. 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00036.x.

  • Asante, Keren; Owen, Richard; Williamson, Glenn (2014): Governance of new product development and perceptions of responsible innovation in the financial sector. Insights from an ethnographic case study. In Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1), pp. 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882552.

  • Baumgartner, Rupert J.; Ebner, Daniela (2010): Corporate sustainability strategies. Sustainability profiles and maturity levels. In Sust. Dev. 18 (2), pp. 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.447.

  • Baumol, William J. (2016): On the Appropriate Social Responsibilities of Successful Entrepreneurs. In Business & Society 55 (1), pp. 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650314523087.

  • Beeby, Mick; Booth, Charles (2000): Networks and inter‐organizational learning. A critical review. In The Learning Organization 7 (2), pp. 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/09696470010316260.

  • Bergh, Pontus (2008): Swedish inter-organisational learning network. Outcomes in three dimensions. In IJBG 2 (1), p. 56. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbg.2008.016134.

  • Blok, V.; Hoffmans, L.; Wubben, E.F.M. (2015): Stakeholder engagement for responsible innovation in the private sector. Critical issues and management practices. In Journal on Chain and Network Science 15 (2), pp. 147–164. https://doi.org/10.3920/jcns2015.x003.

  • Blok, Vincent; Lemmens, Pieter (2015): The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation. In Bert-Jaap Koops, Ilse Oosterlaken, Henny Romijn, Tsjalling Swierstra, van den Hoven, Jeroen (Eds.): Responsible Innovation 2. Concepts, Approaches, and Applications. Cham: Springer, pp. 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolz, Karsten (2017): Who should be the principal of innovation? In Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1), pp. 78–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1320645.

  • Bolz, Karsten; König, Harald (2018): Can responsible innovation be a moderator of entrepreneurship? Learnings from the debate on advanced biotechnology. In International Journal of Business and Globalisation 21 (3), pp. 308–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, Peter (2000): Social Entrepreneurship. The Art of Mission-Based Venture Development. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tim (2008): Design Thinking. In Harvard Business Review June, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Tim; Wyatt, Jocelyn (2010): Design Thinking for Social Innovation. In Stanford Social Innovation Review 8 (1), pp. 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brundtland, G. H. (1987): Our common future. [report of the] World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: O.U.P.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, Henry William (2003): Open innovation. The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Boyd (2006): Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. In Bus. Strat. Env. 15 (1), pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428.

  • Cohen, Boyd; Winn, Monika I. (2007): Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. In Journal of business venturing 22 (1), pp. 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001.

  • Cooper, Arnold C.; Gimeno-Gascon, F.Javier; Woo, Carolyn Y. (1994): Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. In Journal of business venturing 9 (5), pp. 371–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90013-2.

  • Crane, Andrew; Henriques, Irene; Husted, Bryan W.; Matten, Dirk (2017): Measuring Corporate Social Responsibility and Impact. Enhancing Quantitative Research Design and Methods in Business and Society Research. In Business & Society 56 (6), pp. 787–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650317713267.

  • Crane, Andrew; Ruebottom, Trish (2011): Stakeholder Theory and Social Identity. Rethinking Stake-holder Identification. In J Bus Ethics 102 (S1), pp. 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1191-4.

  • Dean, Thomas J.; McMullen, Jeffery S. (2007): Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship. Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. In Journal of business venturing 22 (1), pp. 50–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F.; Bakker, F. G. A. de (2007): Ideologically motivated activism. How activist groups influence corporate social change. In Academy of Management Review 32 (3), pp. 901–924. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275682.

  • den Hond, Frank; Bakker, Frank G. A. de; Doh, Jonathan (2012): What Prompts Companies to Collaboration With NGOs? Recent Evidence From the Netherlands. In Business & Society 54 (2), pp. 187–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650312439549.

  • Drucker, Peter (1985): Innovation and Entrepreneurship. Practice and Principles. Boston, Mass.: Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, John (1997): Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esty, Daniel C.; Porter, Michael E. (1998): Industrial Ecology and Competitiveness. In Journal of Industrial Ecology 2 (1), pp. 35–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1998.2.1.35.

  • European Commission (2014): Responsible Research and Innovation. Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freear, John; Wetzel, William E. (1990): Who bankrolls high-tech entrepreneurs? In Journal of business venturing 5 (2), pp. 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90001-a.

  • Freeman, R. Edward (1984): Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaskell, George (2010): Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010. Winds of change?: A report to the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Research. Brussels: European Commission (EUR, 24537 EN).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graedel, Thomas E.; Allenby, Braden R. (1995): Industrial ecology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Barbara L. (1989): Collaborating. Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems. 1.ed. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, Michelle (2007): Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility. In Journal of Business Ethics 74 (4), pp. 315–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9509-y.

  • Grunwald, Armin (2011): Responsible Innovation: Bringing together Technology Assessment, Applied Ethics, and STS research. In Enterprise and Work Innovation Studies (7), pp. 9–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunwald, Armin (2014): Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation. In J. van den Hoven, N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.-J. Koops, H. Romijn (Eds.): Responsible Innovation 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues: Springer Netherlands, pp. 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, Ranjay (1999): Network location and learning. The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. In Strat. Mgmt. J. 20 (5), pp. 397–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0266(199905)20:5%3c397::aid-smj35%3e3.0.co;2-k.

  • Guston, David H. (2004): Responsible innovation in the commercialised university. In Donald G. Stein (Ed.): Buying in or selling out? The commercialization of the American research university. New Brunswick, N.J: Rutgers University Press, pp. 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H.; Fisher, Erik; Grunwald, Armin; Owen, Richard; Swierstra, Tsjalling; van der Burg, Simone (2014): Responsible innovation. Motivations for a new journal. In Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1), pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.885175.

  • Hall, Jeremy; Bachor, Vernon; Matos, Stelvia (2014): Developing and diffusing new technologies. Strategies for legitimization. In California Management Review 56 (3), pp. 98–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Jeremy K.; Daneke, Gregory A.; Lenox, Michael J. (2010): Sustainable development and entrepreneurship. Past contributions and future directions. In Journal of business venturing 25 (5), pp. 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, Thomas; Puri, Manju (2002): Venture Capital and the Professionalization of Start-Up Firms. Empirical Evidence. In The Journal of Finance 57 (1), pp. 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00419.

  • Hellström, Tomas (2003): Systemic innovation and risk. Technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. In Technology in Society 25 (3), pp. 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0160-791x(03)00041-1.

  • Hippel, Eric von (2005): Democratizing innovation. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenberg, Daniel (2011): The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy. Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Babson College. Babson Park, Mass. (Babson Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, David (2001): What is Innovation and Entrepreneurship? Lessons for larger Organisations. In Industrial and Commercial Training 33 (4), pp. 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Phillip H.; Aldrich, Howard E.; Keister, Lisa A. (2006): Access (Not) Denied. The Impact of Financial, Human, and Cultural Capital on Entrepreneurial Entryin the United States. In Small Bus Econ 27 (1), pp. 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-0007-x.

  • Knight, R. M. (1987): Corporate Innovation and Entrepreneurship: A Canadian Study. In Journal of Product Innovation Management 4 (4), pp. 284–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Andrea L. (2000): Sustainable innovation through an entrepreneurship lens. In Bus. Strat. Env. 9 (5), pp. 304–317. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0836(200009/10)9:5%3c304::aid-bse255%3e3.0.co;2-o.

  • Le Blanc, David (2015): Towards Integration at Last? The Sustainable Development Goals as a Network of Targets. In Sust. Dev. 23 (3), pp. 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1582.

  • Lindgreen, Adam; Swaen, Valérie (2010): Corporate Social Responsibility. In International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (1), pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00277.x.

  • Luke, Timothy W. (2013): Corporate Social Responsibility. An Uneasy Merger of Sustainability and Development. In Sust. Dev. 21 (2), pp. 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1558.

  • Mackey, John; Sisodia, Rajendra (2014): Conscious capitalism. Liberating the heroic spirit of business. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Johanna; Martí, Ignasi (2006): Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. In Journal of World Business 41 (1), pp. 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002.

  • Manring, S. L. (2007): Creating and Managing Interorganizational Learning Networks To Achieve Sustainable Ecosystem Management. In Organization & Environment 20 (3), pp. 325–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026607305738.

  • McDonough, William; Braungart, Michael (2002): Cradle to cradle. Remaking the way we make things. 1. ed. New York, NY: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, James F. (1993): Predators and prey. A new ecology of competition. In Harvard Business Review 71 (3), pp. 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, Jeff; Willis, Jim; Martinis, Domenico de; Hansen, Bjorn; Laursen, Henrik; Sintes, Juan Riego et al. (2011): Science policy considerations for responsible nanotechnology decisions. In Nature nanotechnology 6 (2), pp. 73–77. https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.191.

  • Neck, Heidi M.; Meyer, G. Dale; Cohen, Boyd; Corbett, Andrew C. (2004): An Entrepreneurial System View of New Venture Creation. In J Small Business Management 42 (2), pp. 190–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627x.2004.00105.x.

  • Ney, Steven; Beckmann, Markus; Graebnitz, Dorit; Mirkovic, Ratislava (2014): Social entrepreneurs and social change. Tracing impacts of social entrepreneurship through ideas, structures and practices. In International journal of entrepreneurial venturing 6 (1), pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, Jesse (2008): Compassionate economics. The social foundations of economic prosperity. London: Policy Exchange.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, R.; Macnaghten, P.; Stilgoe, J. (2012): Responsible research and innovation. From science in society to science for society, with society. In Science and Public Policy 39 (6), pp. 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.

  • Owen, Richard; Stilgoe, Jack; Macnaghten, Phil; Gorman, Mike; Fisher, Erik; Guston, Dave (2013): A framework for responsible innovation. In Richard Owen, J. R. Bessant, Maggy Heintz (Eds.): Responsible Innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. First edition. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 27–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandza, Krsto; Ellwood, Paul (2013): Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation. In Research Policy 42 (5), pp. 1112–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.

  • Pellé, Sophie (2016): Process, outcomes, virtues. The normative strategies of responsible research and innovation and the challenge of moral pluralism. In Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3), pp. 233–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1258945.

  • Peredo, Ana María; McLean, Murdith (2006): Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. In Journal of World Business 41 (1), pp. 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007.

  • Peterson, Robin T.; Jun, Minjoon (2009): Perceptions on Social Responsibility. The entrepreneurial vision. In Business & Society 48 (3), pp. 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650307305758.

  • Pinelli, Michele; Maiolini, Riccardo (2017): Strategies for Sustainable Development. Organizational Motivations, Stakeholders’ Expectations and Sustainability Agendas. In Sust. Dev. 25 (4), pp. 288–298. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1653.

  • Poldner, Kim; Shrivastava, Paul; Branzei, Oana (2016): Embodied Multi-Discursivity. An Aesthetic Process Approach to Sustainable Entrepreneurship. In Business & Society 56 (2), pp. 214–252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576149.

  • Porter, Michael E.; Kramer, Mark R. (2011): Creating Shared Value. In Harvard Business Review January-February, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Walter W.; Koput, Kenneth W.; Smith-Doerr, Laurel (1996): Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation. Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. In Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1), p. 116. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988.

  • Ribeiro, Barbara E.; Smith, Robert D. J.; Millar, Kate (2017): A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation. In Science and engineering ethics 23 (1), pp. 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6.

  • Rule, Erik G.; Irwin, Donald W. (1988): Fostering Intrapreneurship: The New Competitive Edge. In Journal of Business Strategy 9 (3), pp. 44–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb039227.

  • Schaltegger, S.; Lüdeke-Freund, F.; Hansen, E. G. (2016): Business Models for Sustainability. A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. In Organization & Environment 29 (1), pp. 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, Stefan; Wagner, Marcus (2011): Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Innovation. Categories and Interactions. In Business Strategy and the Environment 20 (4), pp. 222–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682.

  • Schomberg, René von (2013): A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation. In Richard Owen, J. R. Bessant, Maggy Heintz (Eds.): Responsible Innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society. First edition. Chichester: Wiley, pp. 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1934): Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Eine Untersuchung über Unternehmergewinn, Kapital, Kredit, Zins und den Konjunkturzyklus. 4th ed. München: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1983): The theory of economic development. An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books (Social science classics series).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selsky, J. W. (1991): Lessons in Community Development: An Activist Approach to Stimulating Interorganizational Collaboration. In The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (1), pp. 91–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391271005.

  • Senge, Peter; Lichtenstein, Benyamin; Kaeufer, Katrin; Bradbury, Hilary; Carroll, John (2007): Collaborating for systemic change. In MIT Sloan Management Review 48 (2), pp. 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S.; Venkataraman, S. (2000): The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. In Academy of Management Review 25 (1), pp. 217–226. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2000.2791611.

  • Shane, Scott; Cable, Daniel (2002): Network Ties, Reputation, and the Financing of New Ventures. In Management Science 48 (3), pp. 364–381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731.

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1959): Theories of decision making in economics and behavioural science. In The American Economic Review 49 (3), pp. 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1993): Strategy and organizational evolution. In Strat. Mgmt. J. 14 (S2), pp. 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141011.

  • Simon, Herbert A. (1996): The sciences of the artificial. 3. ed. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, Reinhard (2006): Mapping stakeholder theory anew. From the ‘stakeholder theory of the firm’ to three perspectives on business-society relations. In Bus. Strat. Env. 15 (1), pp. 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.467.

  • Steurer, Reinhard; Langer, Markus E.; Konrad, Astrid; Martinuzzi, André (2005): Corporations, Stakeholders and Sustainable Development I. A Theoretical Exploration of Business–Society Relations. In J Bus Ethics 61 (3), pp. 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-7054-0.

  • Stevenson, H. H.; Jarillo, J. C. (1990): A Paradigm of Entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial Management. In Strategic Management Journal 11 (Special Issue: Corporate Entrepreneurship), pp. 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe, Jack; Owen, Richard; Macnaghten, Phil (2013): Developing a framework for responsible innovation. In Research Policy 42 (9), pp. 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.

  • Sutcliffe, Hilary (2011): A report on Responsible Research & Innovation. Available online at https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf, updated on 2011, checked on 3/30/2016.

  • van Marrewijk, Marcel; Werre, Marco (2003): Multiple Levels of Corporate Sustainability. In Journal of Business Ethics 44 (2), pp. 107–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Walter J. V.; Ras, P. J. (2006): The challenge of greening global product chains. Meeting both ends. In Sust. Dev. 14 (4), pp. 245–256. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.270.

  • Vermeulen, Walter J. V.; Seuring, Stefan (2009): Sustainability through the market - the impacts of sustainable supply chain management. Introduction. In Sust. Dev. 17 (5), pp. 269–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.422.

  • VIRI Network (2017). Available online at https://www.virinetwork.org/, checked on 6/9/2017.

  • Volkmann, Christine K.; Tokarski, Kim Oliver; Ernst, Kati (2012): Social entrepreneurship and social business. An introduction and discussion with case studies. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmann, Christine K.; Tokarski, Kim Oliver; Grünhagen, Marc (2010): Entrepreneurship in a European perspective. Concepts for the creation and growth of new ventures. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1919): Politik als Beruf. München: Duncker & Humblot (Geistige Arbeit als Beruf, vier Vorträge vor dem Freistudentischen Bund / Max Weber ; Vortrag 2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max; Runciman, W. G. (Eds.) (1995): Max Weber. Selections in Translation. Reprinted. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, Richard (2005): Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. In The Journal of Corporate Citizenship 17 (Spring 2005), pp. 33–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, David; Colbert, Barry; Freeman, R. Edward (2017): Focusing on Value. Reconciling Corporate Social Responsibility, Sustainability and a Stakeholder Approach in a Network World. In Journal of General Management 28 (3), pp. 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/030630700302800301.

  • Wikström, Per-Arne (2010): Sustainability and organizational activities - three approaches. In Sust. Dev. 18 (2), pp. 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.449.

  • Wood, D. J.; Gray, Barbara (1991): Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration. In The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27 (2), pp. 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886391272001.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Deutschland

    Karsten Bolz & Christine Volkmann

Authors
  1. Karsten Bolz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Volkmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Bolz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. KU Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Harald Pechlaner

  2. KU Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Sebastian Speer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bolz, K., Volkmann, C. (2020). The Responsible Innovation - Entrepreneurship Nexus. In: Pechlaner, H., Speer, S. (eds) Responsible Entrepreneurship. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31616-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31616-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-31615-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-31616-7

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation