Zusammenfassung
Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die grundlegenden methodologischen Prämissen der Ethnomethodologie und Konversationsanalyse und empirische Entwicklungen des ethnomethodologisch-konversationsanalytischen Ansatzes im Bereich der Bildungsforschung. Eine zusammenfassende Darstellung der wichtigsten Forschungsthemen und Ergebnisse exemplarischer ethnomethodologischer und konversationsanalytischer Arbeiten in diesem Bereich zeigt die Mannigfaltigkeit ethnomethodologischen Interesses an Phänomenen im Kontext formaler Bildung und veranschaulicht die ethnomethodologische Perspektive.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Literatur
Apple, Michael W. 1982. Education and power. Boston: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Atkinson, Paul, und Sara Delamont. 1977. Mock-ups and cock-ups: The stage-management of guided discovery instruction. In School experience: Explorations in the sociology of education, Hrsg. Peter Woods und Martyn Hammersley, 87–108. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Benwell, Betham M., und Elizabeth H. Stokoe. 2004. University students resisting academic identity. In Applying conversation analysis, Hrsg. Keith Richards und Paul Seedhouse, 124–139. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Bergmann, Jörg R. 1985. Flüchtigkeit und methodische Fixierung sozialer Wirklichkeit: Aufzeichnungen als Daten der interpretativen Soziologie. In Entzauberte Wissenschaft: Zur Realität und Geltung soziologischer Forschung, Hrsg. Wolfgang Bonß und Heinz Hartmann, 299–320. Göttingen: Schwartz.
Bergmann, Jörg R. 2005. Ethnomethodologie. In Qualitative Sozialforschung. Ein Handbuch, Hrsg. Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardorff und Ines Steinke, 4. Aufl., 118–135. Reinbek: Rowohlt.
Breidenstein, Georg. 2006. Teilnahme am Unterricht. Ethnographische Studien zum Schülerjob. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Breidenstein, Georg. 2010. Überlegungen zu einer Theorie des Unterrichts. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 56(6): 869–887.
Breidenstein, Georg, und Sandra Rademacher. 2017. Individualisierung und Kontrolle. Empirische Studien zum geöffneten Unterricht in der Grundschule. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Brown, Barry, und Eric Laurier. 2005. Maps and journeys: An ethnomethodological investigation. Cartographica 4(3): 17–33.
Cazden, Courtney B. 2001. Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning, 2. Aufl. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Eskildsen, Søren Wind, und Ali Reza Majlesi. 2018. Learnables and teachables in second language talk: Advancing a social reconceptualization of central SLA tenets. Introduction to the Special Issue. The Modern Language Journal 102(Suppl 2018): 3–10.
Fasel Lauzon, Virginie, und Evelyne Berger. 2015. The multimodal organization of speaker selection in classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education 31:14–29.
Francis, David, und Stephen Hester. 2004. An invitation to ethnomethodology. London: Sage.
Gardner, Rod. 2019. Classroom interaction research: The state of the art. Research on Language and Social Interaction 52(3): 212–226.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall. Dt.: Garfinkel, Harold. 2020. Studien zur Ethnomethodologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Garfinkel, Harold, Hrsg. 1986. Ethnomethodological studies of work. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1988. Evidence for locally produced, naturally accountable phenomena of order, logic, reason, meaning, method, etc. in and as of the essential quiddity of immortal ordinary society (I of IV): An announcement of studies. Sociological Theory 6(1): 103–109.
Garfinkel, Harold. 2002. Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Garfinkel, Harold, und Harvey Sacks. 1976. Über formale Strukturen praktischer Handlungen. In Ethnomethodologie. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagshandelns, Hrsg. Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack und Jim Schenkein, 130–176. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Garfinkel, Harold, und Lawrence D. Wieder. 1992. Two incommensurable, asymmetrically alternate technologies of social analysis. In Text in context: Contributions to ethnomethodology, Hrsg. Graham Watson und Robert Seiler, 175–206. London: Sage.
Garfinkel, Harold, Michael Lynch, und Eric Livingston. 1981. The work of a discovering science construed with materials from the optically discovered pulsar. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 11(2): 131–158.
Garton, Sue. 2012. Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction. Classroom Discourse 3(1): 29–45.
Hall, Joan Kelly. 2018. From L2 interactional competence to L2 interactional repertoires: Reconceptualising the objects of L2 learning. Classroom Discourse 9(1): 25–39.
Hammersley, Martyn. 2018. The radicalism of ethnomethodology: An assessment of sources and principles. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Heap, James L. 1985. Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum Inquiry 15(3): 245–279.
Heath, Christian. 1986. Body movement and speech in medical interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heath, Christian, und Paul Luff. 1992. Collaboration and control: Crisis management and multimedia technology in london underground line control rooms. Journal of Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 1(1–2): 69–94.
Heath, Christian, und Paul Luff. 2000. Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hecht, Michael. 2009. Selbsttätigkeit im Unterricht. Empirische Untersuchungen in Deutschland und Kanada zur Paradoxie pädagogischen Handelns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Hellermann, John. 2005. Syntactic and prosodic practices for cohesion in series of three-part sequences in classroom talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(1): 105–130.
Hellermann, John. 2011. Members’ methods, members’ competencies: Looking for evidence of language learning in longitudinal investigations of other-initiated repair. In L2 interactional competence and development, Hrsg. Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann und Simona Pekarek Doehler, 147–172. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Hellermann, John, und Simona Pekarek Doehler. 2010. On the contingent nature of language-learning tasks. Classroom Discourse 1(1): 25–45.
Heritage, John. 2012. Epistemics in action: Action formation and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1): 1–29.
Heritage, Margaret, und John Heritage. 2013. Teacher questioning: The epicenter of instruction and assessment. Applied Measurement in Education 26(3): 176–190.
Hester, Stephen, und David Francis. 1995. Words and pictures: Collaborative storytelling in a primary classroom. Research in Education 53(1): 65–88.
Hester, Stephen, und David Francis. 1997. Reality analysis in a classroom storytelling. British Journal of Sociology 48(1): 95–112.
Hester, Stephen, und David Francis. 2000. Ethnomethodology and local educational order. In Local education order: Ethnomethodological studies of knowledge in action, Hrsg. Stephen Hester und David Francis, 1–19. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hustler, David, und George Payne. 1982. Power in the classroom. Research in Education 28(1): 49–64.
Hutchby, Ian, und Robin Wooffitt. 1998. Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jakonen, Teppo, und Tom Morton. 2013. Epistemic search sequences in peer interaction in a content-based language classroom. Applied Linguistics 36(1): 73–94.
Kääntä, Leila. 2012. Teachers’ embodied allocations in instructional interaction. Classroom Discourse 3(2): 166–186.
Kääntä, Leila. 2014. From noticing to initiating correction: Students’ epistemic displays in instructional interaction. Journal of Pragmatics 66:86–105.
Kalthoff, Herbert. 1995. Die Erzeugung von Wissen. Die Fabrikation von Antworten im Schulunterricht. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 41(6): 925–939.
Kalthoff, Herbert. 1996. Das Zensurenpanoptikum. Eine ethnographische Studie zur schulischen Bewertungspraxis. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 25(2): 106–124.
Kalthoff, Herbert. 2000. „Wunderbar, richtig“. Zur Praxis mündlichen Bewertens im Unterricht. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft 3(3): 429–446.
Kämäräinen, Anniina, Piia Björn, Lasse Eronen, und Eija Kärnä. 2019. Managing epistemic imbalances in peer interaction during mathematics lessons. Discourse Studies 21(3): 280–299.
Keppler, Angela, und Thomas Luckmann. 1991. ‚Teaching‘. Conversational transmission of knowledge. In Asymmetries in dialogue, Hrsg. Iwana Marková und Klaus Foppa, 143–165. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Kern, Friederike. 2018. Clapping hands with the teacher: What synchronization reveals about learning. Journal of Pragmatics 125:28–42.
Koole, Tom. 2007. Parallel activities in the classroom. Language and Education 21(6): 487–501.
Koole, Tom. 2012. Teacher evaluations. Assessing ‚knowing‘, ‚understanding‘ and ‚doing‘. In Evaluating cognitive competences in interaction, Hrsg. Gitte Rasmussen, Catherine E. Brouwer und Dennis Day, 43–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Korbut, Andrei. 2019. A preliminary study of the orderliness of university student note-taking practices. In Studentische Praxis und universitäre Interaktionskultur. Perspektiven einer praxeologischen Bildungsforschung, Hrsg. Tanya Tyagunova, 119–142. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Koschmann, Timothy. 2013. Conversation analysis and learning in interaction. In The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, Hrsg. Carol A. Chapelle, 1038–1043. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Kunitz, Silva, und Klara Skogmyr Marian. 2017. Tracking immanent language learning behavior over time in task-based classroom work. TESOL Quarterly 51(3): 507–535.
Lee, Josephine. 2017. Multimodal turn allocation in ESL peer group discussions. Social Semiotics 27(5): 671–692.
Lee, Yo-An, Hrsg. 2007. Third turn position in teacher talk: Contingency and the work of teaching. Journal of Pragmatics 39(6): 1204–1230.
Lerner, Gene. 1995. Turn design and the organization of participation in instructional activities. Discourse Processes 19(1): 111–131.
Liberman, Kenneth. 2004. Dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture: An ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Limberg, Holger. 2010. The interactional organization of academic talk: Office hour consultations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Lindwall, Oskar, und Gustav Lymer. 2008. The dark matter of lab work: Illuminating the negotiation of disciplined perception in mechanics. Journal of the Learning Sciences 17(2): 180–224.
Lindwall, Oskar, Gustav Lymer, und Christian Greiffenhagen. 2015. The sequential analysis of instruction. In The handbook of classroom discourse and interaction, Hrsg. Numa Markee, 142–157. Chichester: John Wiley.
Livingston, Eric. 1986. The ethnomethodological foundations of mathematics. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Llewellyn, Nick, und Jon Hindmarsh, Hrsg. 2010. Organisation, interaction and practice: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luff, Paul, Jon Hindmarsh, und Christian Heath, Hrsg. 2000. Workplace studies: Recovering work practice and informing system design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Luke, Allan. 1995–1996. Text and discourse in education: An introduction to critical discourse analysis. Review of Research in Education 21:3–48.
Lynch, Michael. 1985. Art and artifact in laboratory science: A study of shop work and shop talk. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Lynch, Michael. 1993. Scientific practice and ordinary action. Ethnomethodology and social studies of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lynch, Michael, und David Bogen. 1994. Harvey Sacks’s primitive natural science. Theory, Culture & Society 11(4): 65–104.
Lynch, Michael, und Douglas H. Macbeth. 1998. Demonstrating physics lessons. In Thinking practices in mathematics and science learning, Hrsg. James G. Greeno und Shelley V. Goldman, 269–298. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lynch, Michael, Eric Livingston, und Harold Garfinkel. 1983. Temporal order in laboratory life. In Science observed: Perspectives on the social study of science, Hrsg. Karin Knorr-Cetina und Michael Mulkay, 205–238. London: Sage. Dt.: Lynch, Michael, Eric Livingston und Harold Garfinkel. 1985. Zeitliche Ordnung in der Arbeit des Labors. In Entzauberte Wissenschaft: Zur Realität und Geltung soziologischer Forschung, Hrsg. Wolfgang Bonß und Heinz Hartmann, 179–206. Göttingen: Schwartz.
Macbeth, Douglas H. 1990. Classroom order as practical action. British Journal of Sociology of Education 11(2): 189–214.
Macbeth, Douglas H. 1991. Teacher authority as practical action. Linguistics and Education 3(4): 281–313.
Macbeth, Douglas H. 1992. Classroom „floors“: Material organizations as a course of affairs. Qualitative Sociology 15(2): 123–150.
Macbeth, Douglas H. 2004. The relevance of repair for classroom correction. Language in Society 33(5): 703–736.
Macbeth, Douglas H. 2010. Ethnomethodology in education research. In International encyclopedia of education, Hrsg. Penelope Peterson, Eva Baker und Barry McGaw, Bd. 6, 392–400. Oxford: Elsevier.
Margutti, Piera, und Paul Drew. 2014. Positive evaluation of student answers in classroom instruction. Language and Education 28(5): 436–458.
Markee, Numa. 2004. The organization of off-task talk in second language classrooms. In Applying conversation analysis, Hrsg. Keith Richards und Paul Seedhouse, 197–213. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
McHoul, Alexander. 1978. The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society 7(2): 183–213.
McHoul, Alexander. 1990. The organization of repair in classrooms. Language in Society 19(3): 349–377.
McHoul, Alexander, und D. Rodney Watson. 1984. Two axes for the analysis of ‚commonsense‘ and ‚formal‘ geographical knowledge in classroom talk. British Journal of Sociology of Education 5(3): 281–302.
Meehan, Albert J. 1989. Assessing the ‚police-worthiness‘ of citizen’s complaints to the police: Accountability and the negotiation of facts. In The interactional order: New directions in the study of social order, Hrsg. David T. Helm, W. Timothy Anderson, Albert Jay Meehan und Anne Warfield Rawls, 116–140. New York: Irvington.
Mehan, Hugh. 1979a. Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mehan, Hugh. 1979b. „What time is it, denise?“: Asking knowing information questions in classroom discourse. Theory Into Practice 18(4): 285–292.
Mehan, Hugh. 1980. The competent student. Anthropology and Education Quarterly 11(3): 131–152.
Meier zu Verl, Christian, Yaël Kreplak, Clemens Eisenmann, und Alex Dennis, Hrsg. 2020. Ethnomethodology and ethnography (special issue). Ethnographic Studies 17:i–iv.
Mori, Junko. 2002. Task design, plan, and development of talk-in-interaction: An analysis of a small group activity in a japanese language classroom. Applied Linguistics 23(3): 323–347.
Mori, Junko. 2004. Negotiating sequential boundaries and learning opportunities: A case from a japanese language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 88(4): 536–550.
Mortensen, Kristian. 2009. Establishing recipiency in pre-beginning position in the second language classroom. Discourse Processes 46(5): 491–515.
Nassaji, Hossein, und Gordon Wells. 2000. What’s the use of „triadic dialogue“? An investigation of teacher-student interaction. Applied Linguistics 21(3): 376–406.
Payne, George, und David Hustler. 1980. Teaching the class: The practical management of a cohort. British Journal of Sociology of Education 1(1): 49–66.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, und Evelyne Pochon-Berger. 2011. Developing ‚methods‘ for interaction: a cross-sectional study of disagreement sequences in French L2. In L2 interactional competence and development, Hrsg. Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann und Simona Pekarek Doehler, 206–243. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Pollner, Melvin, und Robert M. Emerson. 2001. Ethnomethodology and ethnography. In Handbook of ethnography, Hrsg. Paul Atkinson, Amanda Coffey, Sara Delamont, John Lofland und Lyn Lofland, 118–135. London: Sage.
Rouncefield, Mark, und Peter Tolmie, Hrsg. 2011. Ethnomethodology at work. Farnham: Ashgate.
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, Hrsg. J. Maxwell Atkinson und John Heritage, 21–27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation, Bd. 2, Hrsg. Gail Jefferson. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, und Gail Jefferson. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.
Sahlström, Fritjof. 2011. Learning as social action. In L2 interactional competence and development, Hrsg. Joan Kelly Hall, John Hellermann und Simona Pekarek Doehler, 45–65. Clevendon: Multilingual Matters.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A., Gail Jefferson, und Harvey Sacks. 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53(2): 361–382.
Stokoe, Elizabeth, Bethan Benwell, und Frederick Attenborough. 2013. University students managing engagement, preparation, knowledge and achievement: Interactional evidence from institutional, domestic and virtual settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 2(2): 75–90.
Streeck, Jürgen. 1979. ‚Sandwitch. Good for you.‘ Zur pragmatischen und konversationellen Analyse von Bewertungen im institutionellen Diskurs in der Schule. In Arbeiten zur Konversationsanalyse, Hrsg. Jürgen Dittman, 235–257. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Suchman, Lucy A. 1987. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suchman, Lucy A. 2007. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions, 2. Aufl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sudnow, David. 1978. Ways of the hand: The organization of improvised conduct. London: Routledge & Paul Kegan.
Tyagunova, Tanya. 2014. Das Timing der lokalen Interaktionsordnung in universitären Settings. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung (ZQF) 14(1–2): 227–243.
Tyagunova, Tanya. 2017. Interaktionsmanagement im Seminar. Empirische Untersuchungen zu studentischen Partizipationspraktiken. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Tyagunova, Tanya, und Christian Greiffenhagen. 2017. Closing seminars and lectures: The work that lecturers and students do. Discourse Studies 19(3): 314–340.
Verkuyten, Maykel. 2000. School marks and teachers’ accountability to colleagues. Discourse Studies 2(4): 452–472.
Young, Michael F. D., Hrsg. 1971. Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education. London: Collier – Macmillan.
Zaborowski, Katrin U., Michael Meier, und Georg Breidenstein. 2011. Leistungsbewertung und Unterricht – Ethnographische Studien zur Bewertungspraxis in Gymnasium und Sekundarschule. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Zemel, Alan, und Timothy Koschmann. 2013. Recalibrating reference within a dual-space interaction environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 8(1): 65–87.
Zimmerman, Don H., und Melvin Pollner. 1976. Die Alltagswelt als Phänomen. In Ethnomethodologie. Beiträge zu einer Soziologie des Alltagshandelns, Hrsg. Elmar Weingarten, Fritz Sack und Jim Schenkein, 64–104. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breidenstein, G., Tyagunova, T. (2022). Ethnomethodologie und Konversationsanalyse. In: Bauer, U., Bittlingmayer, U.H., Scherr, A. (eds) Handbuch Bildungs- und Erziehungssoziologie. Bildung und Gesellschaft. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30903-9_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30903-9_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-30902-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-30903-9
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)