Abstract
This article explores how teachers in German and US public schools relate to students’ educational paths and experiences in the context of transnational migration. The analysis is based on focus groups held in two schools. Selected sequences were analyzed comparatively with the aid of interpretative methods. The focus groups firstly reveal different types of knowledge and notions of normality teachers draw on when relating to their students’ lives, as well as heterogeneous professional self-positionings. These differences can be linked to local school cultures, professional knowledge repertoires and institutional hierarchies, as well as distinct traditions of anti-discrimination in Germany and the US. Secondly, the analysis highlights overlapping paradoxes of pedagogical professionalism resulting from the tension between students’ transnational biographies and nation-state-oriented school systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Undoubtedly, types of mobility which (by law) fall into the category of forced migration potentially create a specific vulnerability due to legal frameworks which are beyond the individual’s control. Yet in this article we focus on similarities rather than on differences in relation to other types of transnational migration, by highlighting the confusion students’ transnational biographies create in nation-state-oriented public schools.
- 2.
Our analysis is part of a comparative qualitative research project on school cultures in migration societies, which was conducted in German and US schools. The EDUSPACE project (2015–2019, funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and led by Merle Hummrich, Goethe-University Frankfurt) investigates how schools in Germany and the US refer to issues of diversity and inequity, and how difference is constructed and processed, against the backdrop of distinct histories of migration and racism, as well as different educational policies and approaches to diversity and anti-discrimination. The study is designed as a qualitative multi-level analysis (see Hummrich and Terstegen 2018) with a focus on case studies in four schools. These include analyses of school programs, homepages, focus groups with teachers and interviews with principals, as well as ethnographic writings and audio recordings of classroom interaction (see also Hummrich 2019).
- 3.
Here, we refer to Paul Mecheril’s concept of a migration society (“Migrationsgesellschaft”; see Mecheril 2010, p. 11).
- 4.
All names have been changed for the purpose of anonymization.
- 5.
Here, Pries refers to Elias (1986).
- 6.
- 7.
Schools can therefore also be examined as transnational educational spaces themselves (see Hinrichsen and Paz Matute 2018).
- 8.
The teachers participating in the discussions were the ones whose classes we observed. The observations in all schools took place in grade 9.
- 9.
“English as a second language”: these are students who are attributed support in the English language. Their first language is mostly Spanish, as they have migrated mainly from South and Central America to the USA. The ESL classes at this school are therefore held in both languages.
- 10.
This term is used to describe a certain mode of generalization, which focuses on similarities with respect to individuals’ positions in social space and life conditions, while disregarding the particularity of individual experience (see Schulze 1997, p. 178).
- 11.
The enduring interpersonal relationships between family members in Syria and in Germany as described here mark an example of social interdependencies (Pries 1996, p. 457) and illustrate transnational dimensions of forced migration.
- 12.
The interview statements were translated by the authors.
- 13.
- 14.
For a comparative perspective on school cultures with regard to transnationalization, see Hummrich (2018).
- 15.
German as a second language (“Deutsch als Zweitsprache”); the provision and organization of DaZ courses varies between schools. During our research, one of the schools we visited provided DaZ in separate classes on different levels for newly arrived migrant students. The other school offered no DaZ classes at all at this time.
- 16.
However, this commitment also reaches its limits when migration- and asylum-related conditions endanger students’ school participation. Sara Fürstenau (2015, p. 161) thus emphasizes these limits of schools as opposed to a challenge which always includes the possibility of a solution to the problem.
References
Altrichter, H. (2010). Mikropolitik der Schulentwicklung [Micro-Politics of School Development]. In T. Bohl, W. Helsper, H.-G. Holtappels & C. Schelle (Eds.), Handbuch Schulentwicklung. Theorie – Forschungsbefunde – Entwicklungsprozesse – Methodenrepertoire (pp. 96–99). Bad Heilbrunn: UTB.
Amelina, A., & Faist, T. (2012): De-naturalizing the National in Research Methodologies: Key Concepts of transnational Studies in Migration. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(10), 1707–1724. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2012.659273
Apitzsch, U., & Siouti, I. (2014). Transnational Biographies. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 15(1–2), 11–23. Retrieved April 22, 2020, from https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/46102/ssoar-zqf-2014-1-2-apitzsch_et_al-Transnational_biographies.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-zqf-2014-1-2-apitzsch_et_al-Transnational_biographies.pdf
Bartlett, L., & Vavrus, F. (2013). Introduction: Knowing, Comparatively. In L. Bartlett & F. Vavrus (Eds.), Critical Approaches to Comparative Education. Vertical Case Studies from Africa, Europe, the Middle East, and the Americas (pp. 1–18). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). Die biographische Illusion [The Biographical Illusion]. BIOS. Zeitschrift für Biographieforschung und Oral History, 3(1), 75–81. (Original work published 1986)
Chamakalayil, L., & Riegel, C. (2016). Negotiating Potentials and Limitations in Education in Transnational Migration Contexts: A Case Study. European Education, 48(2), 120–136.
Dabach, D. B., & Fones, A. (2016). Beyond the „English learner“ frame: Transnational funds of knowledge in social studies. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 18(1), 7–27.
Dausien, B., & Hanses, A. (2017). „Biographisches Wissen” – Erinnerung an ein uneingelöstes Forschungsprogramm. Einleitung in den Themenschwerpunkt [“Biographical knowledge” - Memory of an unfulfilled Research Program. Introduction to the Main Topic]. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Sozialforschung, 18(2), 173–189.
Dreke, C. (2011). Zukunftswege von Schulkindern. Soziale Differenzierungen durch Primarschullehrkräfte in Italien und Deutschland [The Future Ways of School Children. The impact of Primary School Teachers on Social Differentiation in Italy and Germany]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 31(4), 363–377.
Elias, N. (1986).: Was ist Soziologie? [What is sociology?] (5th ed.). Weinheim & München: Juventa.
Falkenberg, K. (2018). Permanenter Vergleich. Methodologische Überlegungen zu einer an der Grounded Theory Methodologie orientierten international vergleichenden Forschung [Permanent comparison. Methodological Reflections on a Grounded Theory-oriented International Comparative Research]. Tertium Comparationis: Journal für International und Interkulturell Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(1), 107–134.
Fürstenau, S. (2015). Transmigration und transnationale Familien. Neue Perspektiven der Migrationsforschung als Herausforderung für die Schule [Transmigration and Transnational Families. New Perspectives of Migration Research as a Challenge for Schools]. In R. Leiprecht & A. Steinbach (Eds.), Schule in der Migrationsgesellschaft. Ein Handbuch (Vol. 1, pp. 143–165). Schwalbach am Taunus, Germany: Wochenschau.
Gogolin, I., & Pries, L. (2004). Transmigration und Bildung [Transmigration and Education]. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 7(1), 5–19.
Gomolla, M., & Radtke, F.-O. (2009). Institutionelle Diskriminierung. Zur Herstellung ethnischer Differenz in der Schule [Institutional discrimination. On the production of ethnic difference in school] (2nd rev. ed.). Wiesbaden: VS.
Helsper, W. (2008). Schulkulturen als symbolische Sinnordnungen und ihre Bedeutung für die pädagogische Professionalität [School Cultures as Symbolic Orders of Meaning and their Significance for Pedagogical Professionalism]. In W. Helsper, S. Busse, M. Hummrich, & R.-T. Kramer (Eds.), Pädagogische Professionalität in Organisationen (pp. 115–145). Wiesbaden: VS.
Hinrichsen, M., & Paz Matute, P. (2018). „Den Horizont erweitern?“ – Schulische Internationalisierung und die Konstruktion (trans)nationaler Bildungsräume [“Expanding the Horizon?” – School-based Internationalization and the Construction of (Trans)National Educational Spaces]. Tertium Comparationis: Journal für International und Interkulturell Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), pp. 190–205.
Hummrich, M. (2018). Transnationalisierung, Transnationalität und der Vergleich von Schulkulturen [Transnationalisation, transnationality and the comparison of school cultures]. Tertium Comparationis: Journal für International und Interkulturell Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft, 24(2), 171–189.
Hummrich, M. (2019). Die Macht der Inklusion. Zur Relationalität von symbolischen Ordnungen in der Schule [The power of inclusion. On the Relationality of symbolic orders in school]. In S. Holtmann, P. Hascher & R. Stein (Eds.), Inklusionen und Exklusionen des Humanen (pp. 13–40). Kempten: Klinkhardt.
Hummrich, M., & Terstegen, S. (2018). Qualitative Mehrebenenanalyse und Kulturvergleich [Qualitative multi-level analysis and cultural comparison]. In C. Thon, M. Menz, L. Abdessadok & M. Mai (Eds.), Kindheiten zwischen Familie und Kindertagesstätte. Differenzdiskurse und Positionierungen von Eltern und pädagogischen Fachkräften (pp. 205–223). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Kade, J., Nittel, D., & Seitter, W. (2007). Einführung in die Erwachsenenbildung/Weiterbildung [Introduction to Adult Education/Further Education] (Rev. ed.). Stuttgart: Kohlhammer&Urban.
Kalpaka, A. (2011). Institutionelle Diskriminierung im Blick. Von der Notwendigkeit, Ausblendungen und Verstrickungen in rassismuskritischer Bildungsarbeit zu thematisieren [Eye on Institutional Discrimination. On the Necessity of Thematizing Dismissals and Entanglements in Racism-Critical Education]. In W. Scharathow & R. Leiprecht (Eds.), Rassismuskritik. Rassismuskritische Bildungsarbeit (Vol. 2, pp. 25–40). Schwalbach am Taunus: Wochenschau.
Kemp-Graham, K. (2018). #BlackGirlsMatter: A Case Study Examining the Intersectionality of Race, Gender and School Discipline. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 21(3), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555458917741171
Kohli, M. (1985). Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs. Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente [The Institutionalization of the Life Course. Historical Findings and theoretical Arguments]. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 37(1) 1–29.
Kramer, R.-T. (2015). „Reproduktionsagenten” oder „Transformationsakteure”? Lehrkräfte im Blick der Bildungssoziologie von Pierre Bourdieu [“Reproduction Agents” or “Transformation Actors”? Teachers in the view of Pierre Bourdieu's Sociology of Education]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 3(4), 344–359.
Lange-Vester, A. (2015). Habitusmuster von Lehrpersonen – auf Distanz zur Kultur der unteren sozialen Klassen [Habitus Patterns of Teachers - at a Distance from the Culture of the lower social Classes]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation, 35(4), 360–376.
Lutz, H. (2004). Transnationale Biographien in globalisierten Gesellschaften [Transnational Biographies in Globalised Societies]. In M. Ottersbach & E. Yildiz (Eds.), Migration in der metropolitanen Gesellschaft. Zwischen Ethnisierung und globaler Neuorientierung (pp. 207–217). Hamburg & Münster: LIT.
Mecheril, P. (2003). Prekäre Verhältnisse. Über natio-ethno-kulturelle (Mehrfach-)Zugehörigkeit [Precarious conditions. On natio-racial-culturally coded orders of belonging]. Münster: Waxmann.
Mecheril, P. (2010). Migrationspädagogik. Hinführung zu einer Perspektive [Migration pedagogy. Introduction to a perspective]. In P. Mecheril, M. Castro Varela, İ. Dirim, A. Kalpaka & C. Melter (Eds.), Migrationspädagogik (pp. 7–22). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Phoenix, A., Howarth, C., & Philogène, G. (2017). The everyday politics of identities and social representations: a critical approach. Papers on Social Representations, 26(1), 2.1–2.21. Retrieved April 10, 2020, from http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/87716/1/Howarth_Everyday%20Politics%20of%20Identities.pdf
Pries, L. (1996). Transnationale Soziale Räume. Theoretisch-empirische Skizze am Beispiel der Arbeitswanderungen Mexico - USA [Transnational social spaces. A theoretical-empirical sketch using the example of the work migration Mexico - USA]. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 25(6) 456–472.
Pries, L. (2001). The approach of transnational social spaces. Responding to new configurations of the social and the spatial. In L. Pries (Ed.), New transnational social spaces. International migration and transnational companies in the early twenty-first century (pp. 3–36). London: Routledge.
Schroeder, J., & Seukwa, L. H. (2018). Bildungsbiografien: (Dis-)Kontinuitäten im Übergang [Educational Biographies: (Dis-)continuities in Transition]. In N. v. Dewitz, H. Terhart & M. Massumi (Eds.), Neuzuwanderung und Bildung. Eine interdisziplinäre Perspektive auf Übergänge in das deutsche Bildungssystem (pp. 141–157). Weinheim: Beltz Juventa.
Schulze, T. (1993). Lebenslauf und Lebensgeschichte. Zwei unterschiedliche Sichtweisen und Gestaltungsprinzipien biographischer Prozesse [Life course and life story. Two different views on and design principles of biographical processes]. In D. Baacke & T. Schulze (Eds.), Aus Geschichten lernen. Zur Einübung pädagogischen Verstehens (pp. 174–226). Weinheim & Munich: Beltz Juventa.
Schulze, T. (1997). Das Allgemeine im Besonderen und das besondere Allgemeine [The general in the particular and the particular general]. In I. Hansen-Schaberg (Ed.), ‚Etwas erzählen‘. Die lebensgeschichtliche Dimension in der Pädagogik (pp. 176–188). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider-Verlag Hohengehren.
Schütze, F. (2000). Schwierigkeiten bei der Arbeit und Paradoxien des professionellen Handels. Ein grundlagentheoretischer Aufriß [Difficulties in Work and Paradoxes of Professional Action. A Basic Theoretical Outline.]. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Bildungs-, Beratungs- und Sozialforschung, 1(1) 49–96.
Schwendowius, D., & Thoma, N. (2016). Studienbiographien „mit Migrationshintergrund“? Kritische Anmerkungen zu Praktiken der Besonderung in der universitären Praxis [Study biographies ‘with a migration background’? Critical remarks on practices of othering in university]. Zeitschrift für Qualitative Forschung, 16(1–2), 221–235.
Stanton-Salazar, R. (2011). A social capital framework for the study of institutional agents and their role in the empowerment of low-status students and youth. Youth and society, 43(3), 1066–1109.
Vavrus, F., & Bartlett, L. (2006). Comparatively knowing: Making a Case for the Vertical Case Study. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 8(2), 95–03.
Weis, L., & Fine, M. (Eds.). (2005). Beyond Silenced Voices: Class, Race and Gender in United States Schools (Rev. ed.). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Wimmer, A., & Glick-Schiller, N. (2002). Methodological Nationalism and beyond: Nation-state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwendowius, D., Terstegen, S. (2021). Teachers’ Constructions of Students’ Transnational Biographies: Analyses in German and US Schools. In: Heidrich, L., Karakaşoğlu, Y., Mecheril, P., Shure, S. (eds) Regimes of Belonging – Schools – Migrations. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29189-1_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29189-1_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29188-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29189-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)