Skip to main content

Transnationale religiöse Akteure am Beispiel der palästinensischen Boykott-Kampagne gegen Israel

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 616 Accesses

Part of the book series: Gerechter Frieden ((GEFR))

Zusammenfassung

Religionen sind heute transnationaler denn je: vernetzt über neue Kommunikationstechnologien und verbesserte Mobilität, verbunden durch Solidarität und den Austausch von Informationen, Ressourcen und Personen, engagiert in den aktuellen Themenfeldern globaler Politik wie Frieden, Klimawandel oder Menschenrechte. Während religiöse Gemeinschaften und Organisationen innerhalb von Staaten seit langem Gegenstand der Forschung sind – insbesondere mit Blick auf ihr ambivalentes Verhältnis zu Konflikt und Gewalt – wissen wir über transnationale religiöse Akteure noch vergleichsweise wenig. Der Beitrag untersucht am Beispiel zweier christlicher Organisationen und ihrer Positionierung zur palästinensischen Boykott-Kampagne gegen Israel, wie und warum sich diese grundlegende Ambivalenz religiösen Handelns auch im transnationalen Bereich zeigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • An-Na‘im, Abdullahi A. 2005. The Politics of Religion and the Morality of Globalization. In Religion in Global Civil Society, hrsg. von Mark Juergensmeyer, 23–48. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. Scott. 2000. The Ambivalence of the Sacred. Religion, Violence, and Reconciliation. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. Scott. 2003. Serving Two Masters? Affirming Religious Belief and Human Rights in a Pluralistic World. In The Sacred and the Sovereign, hrsg. von John D. Carlson und Erik C. Owens, 170–195. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, Thomas. 2008. Introduction. In Religious Pluralism, Globalization, and World Politics, hrsg. von Thomas Banchoff, 3–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, Thomas und Robert Wuthnow (Hrsg.). 2011. Religion and the Global Politics of Human Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N. und Janice Gross Stein (Hrsg.). 2012. Sacred Aid. Faith and Humanitarianism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedau, Matthias, Birte Pfeiffer und Johannes Vüllers. 2016. Bad Religion? Religion, Collective Action, and the Onset of Armed Conflict in Developing Countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution 60 (2): 226–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia, Katharina Glaab, Peter J. Smith und Elizabeth Smythe (Hrsg.). 2017. Faith in Justice? The Role of Religion in Struggles for Global Justice. Globalizations 14 (7). Special Issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia und Klaus Dieter Wolf (Hrsg.). 2019. Religious NGOs at the United Nations. Polarizers or Mediators? New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, Peter. 2015. Israel Brands Palestinian-led Boycott Movement a „Strategic Threat“. www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/03/israel-brands-palestinian-boycott-strategic-threat-netanyahu. Zugegriffen: 15. April 2019.

  • Boesenecker, Aaron P. und Leslie Vinjamuri, 2011. Lost in Translation? Civil Society, Faith-Based Organizations and the Negotiation of International Norms. The International Journal of Transitional Justice 5 (3): 345–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bormann, Nils-Christian, Lars-Erik Cederman und Manuel Vogt. 2017. Language, Religion, and Ethnic Civil War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61 (4): 744–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, Clara. 2019. Reconciliation versus Punishment: Religious NGOs and the International Criminal Court. In Religious NGOs at the United Nations. Polarizers or Mediators? hrsg. von Claudia Baumgart-Ochse und Klaus Dieter Wolf, 148–166. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brocker, Manfred.2004. Protest – Anpassung – Etablierung. Die Christliche Rechte im politischen System der USA. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brog, David. 2012. Christian Zionism. An Overdue Reality Check. www.thedailybeast.com/christian-zionism-an-overdue-reality-check. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2019.

  • Carrette, Jeremy R. und Hugh Miall (Hrsg.). 2017. Religion, NGOs, and the United Nations. Visible and Invisible Actors in Power. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José.2007. Rethinking Secularization: A Global Comparative Perspective. In Religion, Globalization, and Culture, hrsg. von Peter Beyer und Lori Beaman, 101–120. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José. 2008. Public Religions Revisited. In Religion: Beyond the Concept, hrsg. von Hent de Vries, 101–119. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, William T. 2009. The Myth of Religious Violence. Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claiborne, Shane und Tony Campolo. 2012. Red Letter Revolution. What if Jesus Really Meant What He Said? Nashville: Thomas Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Gerard. 2019. Faith-based Organizations and International Development in a Post-liberal World. In Religious NGOs at the United Nations. Polarizers or Mediators?, hrsg. von Claudia Baumgart-Ochse und Klaus Dieter Wolf, 84–105. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Juan, Alexander und Andreas Hasenclever. 2009. Das Framing religiöser Konflikte – die Rolle von Eliten in religiös konnotierten Bürgerkriegen. In Identität, Institutionen und Ökonomie. Ursachen innenpolitischer Gewalt, hrsg. von Margit Bussmann, Andreas Hasenclever und Gerald Schneider, 178–205. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Juan, Alexander und Andreas Hasenclever. 2015. Framing Political Violence: Success and Failure of Political Mobilization in the Philippines and Thailand. Civil Wars 17 (2): 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, Erik und Kristian Skrede Gleditsch. 2006. Identity and Conflict: Ties that Bind and Differences that Divide. European Journal of International Relations 12 (1): 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaab, Katharina. 2017. A Climate for Justice? Faith-based Advocacy on Climate Change at the United Nations. In The Role of Religion in Struggles for Global Justice, hrsg. von Peter J. Smith, Katharina Glaab, Claudia Baumgart-Ochse und Elizabeth Smythe, 1110–1124. London: Routledge.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaab, Katharina, Doris Fuchs und Johannes Friederich. 2019. Religious NGOs at the UNFCCC: A Specific Contribution to Global Climate Politics? In Religious NGOs at the United Nations. Polarizers or Mediators?, hrsg.von Claudia Baumgart-Ochse und Klaus Dieter Wolf, 47–63. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gushee, David P. (Hrsg.). 2012. A New Evangelical Manifesto. A Kingdom Vision for the Common Good. Danvers, MA: Chalice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen.2006. Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14 (1): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Die Dialektik der Säkularisierung. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik (4): 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagee, John. 2016. Why Christians Should Support Israel. San Antonio, TX: Christians United for Israel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallward, Maia Carter. 2013. Transnational Activism and the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassner, Ron E. 2009. War on Sacred Grounds. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2015. Beyond Religious Freedom. The New Global Politics of Religion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice. 2004. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Jurisdiction of the Court to give the Advisory Opinion Requested. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamjoum, Hazem.2011. The Global Campaign for Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions against Israel. In Nonviolent Resistance in the Second Intifada, hrsg. von Maia Carter Hallward und Julie M. Norman, 133–151. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ben und Marie Juul Petersen. 2011. Instrumental, Narrow, Normative? Reviewing Recent Work on Religion and Development. Third World Quarterly 32 (7): 1291–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2000. Terror in the Mind of God. The Global Rise of Religious Violence. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Margaret E. und Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Advocacy Networks in International Politics. London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippenberg, Hans G. 2013. „Phoenix from the Ashes“: Religious Communities Arising from Globalization. Journal of Religion in Europe 6 (2): 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laustsen, Carsten Bagge und Ole Waever. 2003. Defense of Religion: Sacred Referent Objects for Securitization. In Religion in International Relations. The Return from Exile, hrsg. von Pavlos Hatzopoulos und Fabio Petito, 147–180. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Peggy. 2004. Redefining the Boundaries of Belonging: The Institutional Character of Transnational Religious Life. Sociology of Religion 65 (1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Cecelia. 2009. A Neo-Weberian Approach to Religion in International Politics. International Theory 1 (3): 381–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und R. Scott Appleby (Hrsg.). 1991. Fundamentalism Observed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und R. Scott Appleby (Hrsg.). 1993a. Fundamentalism and the State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und Scott R. Appleby (Hrsg.). 1993b. Fundamentalisms and Society. Reclaiming the Sciences, the Family, and Education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und R. Scott Appleby (Hrsg.). 1994. Accounting for Fundamentalisms: The Dynamic Character of Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und Scott R. Appleby (Hrsg.). 1995. Fundamentalisms Comprehended. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, Victoria und Richard Falk. 2016. Nonviolence in the Palestinian Rights Struggle. State Crime Journal 5 (1): 163–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli, Luca und Erin K. Wilson. 2016. Postsecularism and International Relations. In Routledge Handbook of Religion and Politics, hrsg. von Jeffrey Haynes, 251–269. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • May, Samantha, Erin Wilson, Claudia Baumgart-Ochse und Faiz Sheikh. 2014. The Religious as Political and the Political as Religious: Globalisation, Post-Secularism and the Shifting Boundaries of the Sacred. Politics, Religion, & Ideology 15 (3): 331–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Sean F. 2014. The Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions Campaign: Contradictions and Challenges. Race & Class 55 (4): 65–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ökumenischer Rat der Kirchen (ÖRK). 2014. Statement on Economic Measures and Christian Responsibility Toward Israel and Palestine. www.oikoumene.org/en/resources/documents/central-committee/geneva-2014/statement-on-economic-measures-and-christian-responsibility-toward-israel-and-palestine. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2019.

  • Ökumenischer Rat der Kirchen (ÖRK) 2015. Erklärung zur Lage in Israel und Palästina. www.oikoumene.org/de/resources/documents/executive-committee/statement-on-situation-in-israel-and-palestine. Zugegriffen: 11. April 2019.

  • Ökumenischer Rat der Kirchen (ÖRK). 2016. WCC Policy on Palestine and Israel 1948–2016 (Summary). www.oikoumene.org/en/resources/documents/wcc-programmes/public-witness/peace-building-cf/wcc-policy-on-palestine-and-israel-1948–2016-summary. Zugegriffen: 12. April 2019.

  • Omer, Atalia. 2009. „It’s Nothing Personal“: The Globalisation of Justice, the Transferability of Protest, and the Case of the Palestine Solidarity Movement. Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 9 (3): 497–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pally, Marcia. 2011. The New Evangelicals. Expanding the Vision of the Common Good. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2000. The Religious Roots of Modern International Relations. World Politics 52 (2): 206–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2002. The Challenge of September 11 to Secularism in International Relations. World Politics 55 (1): 66–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2007. Explaining the Political Ambivalence of Religion. American Political Science Review 101 (3): 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesebrodt, Martin. 2014. Religion in the Modern World: Between Secularization and Resurgence. Max Weber Lecture 2014/1, European University Institute. San Domenico di Fiesole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, Thomas, Stephen C. Ropp und Kathryn Sikkink (Hrsg.). 1999. The Power of Human Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, Laura C. 2010. Palestinian Liberation Theology, Muslim-Christian Relations and the Arab-Israeli Conflict. Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations 21 (1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, Mohd Affandi und Hafiz Zakariya. 2012. The American Evangelical Christians and the U.S. Middle East Policy: A Case Study of the Christians United for Israel (CUFI). Intellectual Discourse 20 (2): 139–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Sean. 2015. Pro-Israel Effort to Combat BDS on U.S. State Level Gains Steam. https://www.breakingisraelnews.com/38267/pro-israeleffort-to-combat-bds-on-us-state-level-gains-steam-jewish-world/. Zugegriffen 17. April 2019.

  • Sider, Ronald J., et al. 2007. Letter to President Bush from Evangelical Leaders. https://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/29/us/evangelical_letter.html. Zugegriffen: 17. April 2019.

  • Stern, Jessica. 2003. Terror in the Name of God. Why Religious Militants Kill. New York: Ecco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Winnifred Fallers; Elizabeth Shakman Hurd, Saba Mahmood und Peter G. Danchin (Hrsg.). 2015. Politics of Religious Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Isak und Desirée Nilsson. 2018. Disputes over the Divine. Journal of Conflict Resolution 62 (5): 1127–1148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, Roy und Steve Bruce. 1992. Secularization: The Orthodox Model. In Religion and Modernization, hrsg. von Steve Bruce, 8–30. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Timothy P. 2005. On the Road to Armageddon. How Evangelicals Became Israel’s Best Friend. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt, Markus A. 2007. Religion Macht Frieden. Das Friedenspotential von Religionen in politischen Gewaltkonflikten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werkner, Ines-Jacqueline (Hrsg.). 2016. Religion in der Friedens- und Konfliktforschung. Interdisziplinäre Zugänge zu einem multidimensionalen Begriff. Zeitschrift für Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sonderband 1. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K. 2012. After Secularism. Rethinking Religion in Global Politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K. und Manfred B. Steger. 2013. Religious Globalism in the Post-Secular Age. Globalizations 10 (3): 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, Diana und Peggy Levitt. 2014. Travelling Faiths and Migration Religions: The Case of Circulating Models of Da’wa Among the Tablighi Jamaat and Foguangshan in Malaysia. Global Networks 14 (3): 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, Robert Stephen Offutt. 2008. Transnational Religious Connections. Sociology of Religion 69 (2): 209–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Baumgart-Ochse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baumgart-Ochse, C. (2019). Transnationale religiöse Akteure am Beispiel der palästinensischen Boykott-Kampagne gegen Israel. In: Werkner, IJ., Dembinski, M. (eds) Gerechter Frieden jenseits des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Gerechter Frieden. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27575-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27575-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-27574-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-27575-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics