Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards an Integrated Agent and Environment Architecture for Simulation of Human Decision Making and Behavior

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Cities/Smart Regions – Technische, wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Innovationen

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Paper präsentiert die IDEATE Architektur, eine auf den Sozialwissenschaften basierende Architektur zur Abbildung von Entscheidungsfindung und Verhalten von intelligenten Agenten. Besonderer Fokus der Architektur liegt auf der unmittelbaren Berücksichtigung von persönlichen und gesellschaftlichen Überzeugungen und Meinungen bei Entscheidungsfindung und der damit verbundenen Wechselwirkung von Agent und Umwelt. Darüber hinaus schlägt dieses Paper ein geeignetes Verfahren zur Formalisierung der Überzeugungen und Meinungen zur Anwendung der IDEATE Architektur in einem späteren Simulationssystem vor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www.nemo-mobilitaet.de

References

  1. Shiftan Y (2000) The advantage of activity-based modelling for air-quality purposes: theory vs practice and future needs. Innov Eur J Soc Sci Res 13(1):95–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernald LD (2007) Psychology: six perspectives. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fishbein M, Ajzen I, Belief, Attitude (1975) Intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Longman Higher Education, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50(2):179–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fishbein M, Ajzen I (2010) Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. Taylor & Francis, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bandura A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37(2):122–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giddens A, Duneier M. Appelbaum RP, Carr D (2016) Introduction to sociology, 10th edn. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Barker C (2005) Cultural studies: theory and practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bourdieu P, Wacquant L (1992) Invitation to a reflexive sociology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bryant CGA (2002) George Soros’s theory of reflexivity: a comparison with the theories of Giddens and Beck and a consideration of its practical value. Econ Soc 31(1):112–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society. University of California Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bourdieu P (1984) Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bourdieu P (1986) The forms of capital. In Richardson JG (Ed) Handbook of theory of research for the sociology of education. ABC-Clio, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  15. Coleman J (1964) Introduction to mathematical sociology. Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coleman J (1998) The foundations of social theory. Belknap Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  17. Krugman P, Wells R(2012) Economics. W. H. Freeman, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rittenberg L, Tregarthen T (2009) Principles of microeconomics. Flat World Knowledge, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shefrin H (2002) Beyond greed and fear: understanding behavioral finance and the psychology of investing. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jessup LM, Valacich JS (2003) Information systems today: managing in the digital world. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  21. Davis F, Bagozzi P, Warshaw P (1989) User acceptance of computer technology – a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Venkatesh V, Davis F (2000) A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag Sci 46(2):186–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis F (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venkatesh V, Thong JYL, Xu X (2012) Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q 36(1):157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goodhue DL, Thompson RL (1995) Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q 19(2):213–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tétard F, Collan M (2009) Lazy user theory: a dynamic model to understand user selection of products and services. In Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wooldridge M (2009) An introduction to multiAgent systems. Wiley, West Sussex

    Google Scholar 

  28. Wooldridge M (2013), Intelligent agents. In Weiss G (Ed) Multiagent systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–50

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lim C, Baumgarten R, Colton S (2010) Evolving behaviour trees for the commercial game DEFCON. In Proceedings of EvoApplications, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kamiński B, Jakubczyk M, Szufel P (2018) A framework for sensitivity analysis of decision trees. CEJOR 26(1):135–159

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Quinlan JR (1987) Simplifying decision trees. Int J Man Mach Stud 27(3):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Russell S, Norvig P (2010) Artificial intelligence. Pearson, London

    Google Scholar 

  33. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Pedrycz W (1993) Fuzzy control and fuzzy systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kendal S, Creen M (2007) An introduction to knowledge engineering. Springer, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is part of the project “NEMo – Sustainable satisfaction of mobility demands in rural regions”. The project is funded by the Ministry for Science and Culture of Lower Saxony (Germany) and the Volkswagen Foundation (VolkswagenStiftung) through the “Niedersächsisches Vorab” grant programme (grant number VWZN3122).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Klaas Dählmann & Jürgen Sauer

Authors
  1. Klaas Dählmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Sauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaas Dählmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Jorge Marx Gómez

  2. Fakultät II - Department für Informatik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Andreas Solsbach

  3. Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany

    Thomas Klenke

  4. HTW Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    Volker Wohlgemuth

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dählmann, K., Sauer, J. (2019). Towards an Integrated Agent and Environment Architecture for Simulation of Human Decision Making and Behavior. In: Marx Gómez, J., Solsbach, A., Klenke, T., Wohlgemuth, V. (eds) Smart Cities/Smart Regions – Technische, wirtschaftliche und gesellschaftliche Innovationen. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-25210-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation