Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantitative Methoden in der international vergleichenden Sozialpolitikforschung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Sozialpolitik

Zusammenfassung

Quantitative Methoden kommen in vielen Bereichen der vergleichenden Sozialpolitikforschung zum Einsatz. Sie zielen darauf ab, allgemeine einzelfallübergreifende Muster und Zusammenhänge zu erkennen. Dieses Kapitel gibt einen Überblick über zentrale methodische Zugänge der quantitativ ausgerichteten vergleichenden Wohlfahrtsstaatsforschung. Konkret werden methodische Grundlagen von gepoolten Zeitreihenanalysen, der logistischen Regression, räumlicher ökonometrischer Verfahren sowie von Mehrebenenanalysen vorgestellt und anhand prominenter Thesen der vergleichenden Sozialpolitikforschung veranschaulicht. Schließlich werden die vorgestellten Verfahren sowie die quantitativ-vergleichende Sozialpolitikforschung insgesamt kritisch im Hinblick auf ihr Potential und ihre Grenzen diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Anselin, Luc. 1988. Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, Badi H. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel. 2008. Time-series cross-section methods. In The Oxford handbook of political methdology, Hrsg. Janet M. Box-Steffensmeier, Henry E. Brady und David Collier, 475 – 493. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel, Kristian S. Gledditsch und Kyle Beardsley. 2006. Space is more than geography: Using spatial econometrics in the study of political economy. International Studies Quarterly 50(1): 27 – 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel und Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review 89(3): 634 – 647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel und Jonathan N. Katz. 2007. Random coefficient models for time-seriescross-section data: Monte Carlo experiments. Political Analysis 15(2): 182 – 195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Nathaniel und Jonathan N. Katz. 2011. Modeling dynamics in time-series-crosssection political economy data. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331 – 352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bickel, Robert. 2007. Multilevel analysis for applied research – It’s just regression. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boix, Carles. 1997. Privatizing the public business sector in the eighties: Economic performance, partisan responses and divided governments. British Journal of Political Science 27(4): 473 – 96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan, Mark L. und Stephen Jenkins. 2016. Multilevel modelling of country effects: A cautionary tale. European Sociological Review 32(1): 3 – 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boef, Suzanna und Luke Keele. 2008. Taking time seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184 – 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elhorst, Paul. 2014. Spatial econometrics: from cross-sectional data to spatial panels. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, Scott R. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation: Logic and practice. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, Robert und Jude Hays. 2007. Spatial econometric models of cross-sectional interdependence in political science panel and time-series-cross-section data. Political Analysis 15(2): 140 – 164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzese, Robert und Jude Hays. 2008. Interdependence in comparative politics: Substance, theory, empirics, substance. Comparative Political Studies 41(4/5): 742 – 780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey und Deborah Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39(2): 145 – 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman, Aandrew und Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/Hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, Harvey. 2011. Multilevel statistical models. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William. 2011. Fixed effects vector decomposition: A magical solution to the Problem of time-invariant variables in fixed effects models? Political Analysis 19(2): 135 – 146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William. 2012. Econometric analysis. New York: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, David W. und Stanley Lemeshow. 2000. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hox, Joop. 2010. Multilevel analysis: techniques and applications. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten. 2012. Labour market- versus life course-related social policies: understanding cross-programme differences. Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 275 –291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele, Luke und Nathan J. Kelly. 2006. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: The ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis 14(2): 186 – 205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, Peter. 2003. A guide to econometrics. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard und Herbert Obinger. 2003. Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 20 – 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, Gary und Zeng Langche. 2001. Logistic regression in rare events data. Political Analysis 9(2): 137 – 163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Hyeok Yong und Jonas Pontusson. 2010. Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited. Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 251 – 281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeSage, James und Kelley Pace. 2008. Introduction to spatial econometrics. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, Scott J. 1997. Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. Newbury Park: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obinger, Herbert, Carina Schmitt und Reimut Zohlnhöfer. 2014. Partisan politics and privatization in OECD countries. Comparative Political Studies 47(9): 1294 – 1323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, Thomas und Vera E. Tröger. 2007. Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Political Analysis 15: 124 – 139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, Thomas und Vera E. Tröger. 2011. Fixed-Effects vector decomposition: Properties, reliability, and instruments. Political Analysis 19(2): 147 – 164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plümper, Thomas und Eric Neumayer. 2010. Model specification in the analysis of spatial dependence. European Journal of Political Research 49(3): 418 – 442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 140(1/2): 105 – 124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, Tom A. B. und Bosker, Roel J. 2012. Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London etc.: Sage Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carina. 2016. Panel data analysis and partisan variables: how periodization influence partisan effects. Journal of European Public Policy 23(10): 1442 – 1459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stegmueller, Daniel. 2013. How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 748 – 761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, Georg, Sebastian Jäckle und Pascal König. 2014. Weiterführende statistische Methoden fur Politikwissenschaftler. Eine anwendungsbezogene Einführung mit Stata. München: Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Sven E. und Daniel M. Butler. 2007. A lot more to do: The sensitivity of time-series cross-Section analyses to simple alternative specifications. Political Analysis 15(2): 101 – 123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2002. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bremen, Deutschland

    Carina Schmitt

Authors
  1. Carina Schmitt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Schmitt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bremen Socium, Bremen, Germany

    Herbert Obinger

  2. Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Manfred G. Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schmitt, C. (2019). Quantitative Methoden in der international vergleichenden Sozialpolitikforschung. In: Obinger, H., Schmidt, M. (eds) Handbuch Sozialpolitik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22803-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation