Abstract
Are we facing a process of aestheticisation of the resistances in the digital age? To answer this question, I propose a concept that characterises modes of resistance in specific places and historical times: the Social Form of the Protest (SFP). The SFP is defined by protest tactics, such as demonstrations and barricades, and structural axes of confrontation, such as capital-labour and centre-periphery. Previous resistances to the inequalities generated by modern industrial capitalism were expressed through an equally modern SFP, born as a reaction to its power structures. At present, digital innovation appears to be modifying the parameters of this dialectical relationship. On the one hand, digital social networks increase communicative potential of the contemporary SFP; but on the other they dilute its deep transformation capacity. If confined to the communicative sphere, digital social media filters may turn resistances into media products. In this process the medium and how—through Information and communications technology—are imposed on the content and what—deep transformation objectives. This results in the emergence of the aestheticisation of resistance and limits its ability to resist growing social inequalities.
Research focus: Research in Precarity, Social Movements, Political Sociology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Communicative capitalism refers to the contemporary merging of capitalism and democratic values—ideals of access, inclusion, discussion and participation—through networked communications technologies (Dean 2005). These technologies allow a renewed model of global digital reproduction of contents and information through social media, beyond the classic industrial mass model.
- 2.
For an exhaustive analysis of the evolution of each protest tactic in the Basque Country for the period 2010–13, see Letamendia Onzain (2015, p. 145).
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1944/1994). Dialéctica de la ilustración. Madrid: Trotta.
Benjamin, W. (1936/2003). La obra de arte en la época de la reproductibilidad técnica.Colonia del Mar: Editorial Itaca.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Contrafuegos 2. Por un movimiento social europeo. Barcelona: Anagrama.
Casemajor, N. (2015). Digital Materialisms: Frameworks for Digital Media. Westminster Papers in Communication and Culture, 10(1), 4–17.
Dean, J. (2005). Communicative capitalism: Circulation and the foreclosure of politics. Cultural Politics, 1(1), 51–74.
Debord, G. (1967/2003). La sociedad del espectáculo. Valencia: Pre-Textos.
Fuchs, C. (2014). Digital prosumption labour on social media in the context of the capitalist regime of time. Time & Society, 23(1), 97–123.
González Ibáñez, E. (2015). Ruido visual: la saturación de imágenes en la contemporaneidad. Ausart Journal for Research in Art, 3(2), 227–236.
Harvey, D. (1990). The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Jessop, R. (2002). The Future of the Capitalist State. Cambridge: Polity.
Letamendia Onzain, A. (2015). La Forma Social de la Protesta en Euskal Herria 1980–2013. Leioa: University of the Basque Country Press.
Letamendia, A., Del Amo, I. A., Diaux, J. (2014). Audiovisual cultural artifacts of protest in the Basque Country. Pacific Journalism Review, 20(2), 224–240.
Lipset, S. M. & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross National Perspective (pp. 1–64). New York: Free Press.
Marx, K. (1867/2009). El Capital. Volume 1. México D.F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
McAdam, D. (1983). Tactical Innovation and the Pace of Insurgency. American Sociological Review, 48(6), 735–754.
Ostman, J. (2012). Information, expression, participation: How involvement in user-generated content relates to democratic engagement among young people. New Media & Society, 14(6), 1004–1021.
Rendueles, C. (2013). Sociofobia. El cambio político en la era de la utopía digital. Madrid: Capitán Swing.
Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat. The new Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury.
Tarrow, S. (1994). Power in Movement. Social Movements, Collective Action and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C. (2007). Contienda política y democracia en Europa, 1650–2000. Barcelona: Hacer.
Tilly, C. & Wood, L. (2010). Los movimientos sociales, 1768–2008. Desde sus orígenes a Facebook. Barcelona: Crítica.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Letamendia, A. (2017). Towards the Aestheticisation of the Resistances in the Digital Age? A Critical Approach. In: Heidkamp, B., Kergel, D. (eds) Precarity within the Digital Age. Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-17678-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-17677-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-17678-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)