Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Kritische Beobachtungen zur Geschichte der Wissenschaftskommunikation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation

Zusammenfassung

Es gibt kaum eine Historiographie der Wissenschaftskommunikation. Ziel dieses Beitrags ist es, anhand von fünf thematischen Feldern zu erarbeiten, was als Grundlage für eine Historiographie der Wissenschaftskommunikation dienen kann. Ich erhebe weder Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit noch auf eine erschöpfende Literaturübersicht. Vielmehr soll hier der Versuch unternommen werden, programmatisch fünf Themen anzudeuten, die eine künftige Geschichte der WK beachten könnte: (1) Wissenschaftskommunikation im Rahmen der Wissenschaftsgeschichte; (2) die Professionalisierung der Wissenschaftskommunikation; (3) eine Ideen- und Modellgeschichte der Kommunikation von Wissenschaft; (4) die Entwicklung der Kommunikationsgenres, und (5) die Periodisierung vor und nach dem angeblichen Neuanfang in den 1980er Jahren. Forschungsstrategisch geht es dabei um nichts Geringeres, als die Praxis der Kommunikation dahingehend abzubilden, dass wir uns auf einem Kontinuum zwischen „Dienst an der diskursiven Vernunft“ oder „Handeln mit symbolischer Gewalt“ verorten können, um damit schließlich die aufklärende Diskussion anzuregen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Empfohlene Literatur

  • Bauer MW (2012) Public attention to science 1820-2010 – a ‘longue duree’ picture, in: Rödder, S., Franzen, M. and P. Weingart (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28, Dordrecht: Springer, chapter 3, pp35-58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude-Vincent B (2001) A geneology of the increasing gap between science and the public, Public Understanding of Science, 10,1 99-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J and S Miller (1998) Science in Public. Communication, culture, and credibility, Cambridge MA, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner S 1990. ‘The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.’ Social Studies of Science 20: 519–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe C & J Gregory (2010): Producing the Post-Fordist Public: The Political Economy of Public Engagement with Science, Science as Culture, 19:3, 273-301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench B & M Bucchi et al. (2014) Global Spread of Science Communication: institutions and practices across continents, in: Bucchi M and B Trends (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edition, London, Routledge, pp214-245.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Aunger R (2000) (ed) Darwinizing Culture – the status of memetics as a science, Oxford, OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausejo E (1994) The window case of science: the associations for the advancement of science and the birth of scientific congresses in Western Europe, Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Sciences, 44(133), 338-371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW (2015) Atoms, Bytes & Genes – Public Resistance and Techno-Scientific Responses, New York, Routledge [Routledge Advances in Sociology 126]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW and B Falade (2014) Public understanding of science: survey research around the world, in: M Bucchi and B Trench (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edition, NY, Routledge, pp140-159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW (2013) The knowledge society favours science communication, but puts science journalism into a clinch, in: Baranger P and B Schiele (eds) Science Communication Today, Paris, CNRS, 145-166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW (2012) Public attention to science 1820-2010 – a ‘longue duree’ picture, in: Rödder, S., Franzen, M. and P. Weingart (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28, Dordrecht: Springer, chapter 3, pp35-58. [ISBN 978-007-2084-8]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW, S Howard, J Romo, L Massarani & L Amorin (2012) Science Journalism Across the World – working conditions, practices, professional ethos and future expectations, A report for SciDev.Net, London, LSE & SciDev.Net, August (126pp) http://www.scidev.net/en/content/our-learning-series/#X346620B030F0470C9BD5FB18DC433272

  • Bauer MW and VP Glaveanu (2011) Communication as rhetoric and argumentation, in: Hook DW, B Franks & MW Bauer (2011) (eds) The Social Psychology of Communication, London, Palgrave, p209-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW and G Gaskell (2008) Social representations theory: a progressive research programme for Social Psychology, Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38, 4, 335-354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer MW & J Gregory (2007) From journalism to corporate communication in post-war Britain, in: Bauer MW & M Bucchi (ed) Science, Journalism and Society: Science Communication Between News and Public Relations, London, Routledge, pp33-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell A and J Turney (2014) Popular science books: from public education to science bestsellers, in: M Bucchi and B Trench (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edition, NY, Routledge, pp15-26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensaude-Vincent B (2001) A geneology of the increasing gap between science and the public, Public Understanding of Science, 10,1 99-113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli M (1999) Galileo, der Hofling: Entdeckungen und Etikette: Vom Aufstieg der neuen Wissenschaft. Frankfurt, S Fischer Verlang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block E (1989) TH Huxley’s rhetoric and the popularization of Victorian scientific ideas, in: Brantlinger P (Ed) Energy & Entropy – Science and culure in Victorian Britain, Bloomington, Indiana UP, pp205-228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenberg, H (1979) Arbeit am Mythos, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bongo G and G Caliendo (eds) (2014) The language of popularization, Bern, Peter Lang

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucchi M (2002) Science in Society – an introduction to social studies of science, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham J (1987) How superstition won and science lost: popularizing science and health in the US, New Brunswick, Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell M (2000) The Tipping Point – how little things can make a big difference, London, Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro P (1993) La roue des sciences, Paris, Albin Michel

    Google Scholar 

  • Caro P (1994) Les procedes litteraires du recit dans la vulgarisation scientifique ecrite et televise, Colloque Quand la science se fait culture, Montreal, Quebec, 10-13 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, H. F. (1994) The scientific revolution – a historiographical enquiry, Chicago, CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter, R and S Pumprey (1994) Separate spheres and public places: reflections on the history of science popularisation and science in popular culture, History of Science, 32, 3/97, 237-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daum A (2002) Wissenschaftpopularisierung im 19th Jahrh. Burgerliche Kultur, naturwissenschaftliche Building and die deutsche Oeffentlichkeit, 1948-1914, Munchen, Oldenbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta P and PA David (1994) Toward a new economics of science. Research Policy, 23, 487-521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff B (1995) Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process, Risk Analysis, 15, 2, 137-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1980 / 1936) Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp Wissenschaft 312 [Orginal, Basel 1935].

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (2009) Naturphilosophie, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (1986) Wider den Methodenzwang, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickel S and N Gross (2005) A general theory of scientific/intellectual movements, American Sociological Review, 70, 204-232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire P (2005) Extension or communication, in: Education for critical consciousness, London & New York, Continuum, pp 87-146 [original 1968]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller S (2010) Science – the art of living, Durham, Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller W (2014) Customised science as a reflection of Protscience, in: Fuller S, M Stenmark and U Zackariassan (eds) The customization of science – the impact of religious and political worldviews on contemporary science, London, Palgrave/Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goepfert W (2007) the strength of PR and the weakness of W-Jouralismus, in: MW Bauer & M Bucchi (eds) Journalism, Science and Society – science communication between News and Public Relations, NY, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glausiusz J (2013) The word on popular science, NATURE, 18 April, Vol 496, p299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyon JB (forthcoming) The history of natural science documentaries: a review, Public Understanding of science,

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J and S Miller (1998) Science in Public. Communication, culture, and credibility, Cambridge MA, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J (2005) Fred Hoyle’s Universe, Oxford, OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J (2003) Popularisation und Excommunication of Fred Hoyle’s ‘life from space’ Theory, Public Understanding of Science, 12, 25-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J and SJ Lock (2008) The evolution of ‘public understanding of science’: public engagement as a tool for science policy in the UK, Social Compass, 2, 4, 1252-1265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory J (2011) Science communication in: Hook DW, B Franks & MW Bauer (2011) (eds) The Social Psychology of Communication, London, Palgrave, p300-315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross AG (1994) The role of rhetoric in the public understanding of science, Public Understanding of science, 3, 3-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn TF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists, American Sociological Review, 48, 781-95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (2001) Kommunikatives Handeln und detranszendentalisierte Vernunft, Stuttgart, Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1962) Strukturwandel der Oeffentlichkeit, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords (2000) Science and Society (London: HMSO)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, Stephen 1990. ‘The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses.’ Social Studies of Science 20: 519–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuermann H (2000) Wissenschaftskritik – Konzepte, Positionen, Probleme, Tubingen, Franke Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords, Select Committee on Science and Technology (2000), Science and Society. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornig Priest, S. (2010) (ed) Encyclopedia of Science and Technology Communication, 2 Volumnes, Los Angeles, SAGE reference (1095pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes J (2007) Insects or neutrons? Science news values in interwar Britain, in: Bauer MW and M Bucchi (eds) Journalism, Science and Society – Science communication between news and public relations, NY, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iliffe R (2014) Stereotypes: Self and Other in early modern English Science, paper presented at the workshop ‘Stereotyping in Early Modern British Public Spheres: History as Fieldwork’, Senate House London, 16/17 June 2014 (organised by Y Yamamoto & V Glaveneau)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacques J and D Raichvarg (1991) Savants et ignorants: une histoire de la vulgarisation des sciences, Paris, Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi D and B Schiele (1993) Science in magazines, and its readers, Public Understanding of Science, 2, 1, 3-20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, E. W. (2009). Reforming school science: a commentary on selected reports and policy documents, Studies in Science Education vol 45, no 1 65-92

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurdant B (1969) Vulgarisation scientifique et ideologie, Communication, 14, 160-161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurdant B (1993) Popularisation of science as the autobiography of science, Public Understanding of Science, 2, 365-373

    Google Scholar 

  • Jurdant B (2013) Les problemes theorique de la vulgarisation scientifique, Paris, Edition des achives contemporaines [Wiederveroeffentlichung von 1974]

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeser E (2009) Pop science: essays zur Wissenschaftskultur, Basel, Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeser E (2013) Science kitsch and pop science: a reconnaissance, Public Understanding of Science, 22, 5, 559-569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kevles DJ (1985) In the name of Eugenics: Genetics and the Uses of Human Heredity, NY, Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight D (2006) The public understanding of science – A history of communicating scientific ideas, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight D (2009) The making of modern Science – Science, Technology and Medicine and Modernity, 1789-1914, Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohring M (2006) Wissenschaftsjournalismus – Forschungsueberblick und Theorieentwurf, UKV Verlagsgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohring M (2012) the underestimated public: comment on Lehmkuhl et al. (2012), scheduling science on television, Public Understanding of Science, 21, 8, 1019-1022.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky S (2004) Science in the Private Interest – has the lure of profits corrupted biomedical research? Lanham, MY, Rowman&Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronick DA (1962) A history of scientific and technical periodicals. The origins and development of the scientific and technological press, 1665-1790, NY, Scarecrow Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette MC (2008) Science on the Air – Popularizers and personalities on radio and early TV, Chicago, CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B and P Weibel (2002) Iconoclash – beyond the image wars in science, religion and arts, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl M, C Karamanidou, T Mora, Kristina Petkova, and B Trench (2012) Scheduling Science on TV: a comparative analysis of the representations of science in 11 European countries. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 8, 1002-1018.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein B (1992) The meaning of ‘public understanding of science’ in the United States after World War II, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 46-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewenstein B (1992) Industrial life insurance, public health campaigns, and public communication of science, 1908-1951, Public Understanding of Science, 1, 4, 347-365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezuan, J and L Soneryd (2007) Consulting Citizens: Technologies of Elicitation and the Mobility of Publics, Public Understanding of Science 16: 279–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckmann T (1995) Der kommunkative Aufbau der sozialen Welt und die Sozialwissenschaften, Annali di Sociologia / Soziologisches Jahrbuch, 11, I-II, 45-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1989) Vertrauen – Ein Mechanismus der Reduktion sozialer Komplexitaet, 3. Durchgesehene Auflage, Stuttgart, Enke Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massarani L, C Aguirre, C Pedersoli, E Raynoso and LM Lindegaard (2015) RedPOP: 25 years of a science communication network in Latin America, Journal of Science Communication, 14, 3, 1-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton RK (1936) The unintended consequences of purposive social action, American Sociological Review, 1, 6, 894-904.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellor F (2013) Twenty years of teaching science communication: a case study of Imperial College’s Master Programme, Public Understanding of Science, 22, 8, 916-926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer M (2008) Principia Rhetorica, Paris, Fayard

    Google Scholar 

  • Milburn C (2002) Nanotechnology in the age of posthuman engeineering: science fiction as science, Configurations, 10, 261-295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moles A et Jean Oulif (1967) Le troisième homme – Vulgarisation scientifique et radio, Diogène, 58, 29-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers G (1989) 19th century Popularization of thermodynamics and the rhetoric of prophecy, in: Brantlinger P (Ed) Energy & Entropy – Science and culure in Victorian Britain, Bloomington, Indiana UP, pp307-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, G. (1992). Textbooks and the sociology of scentific knowledge. English for Specific Purposes, 11(1):3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidhardt F (1993) The public as communication system, Public Understanding of Science, 2, 339-350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborn J and J Dillon (2008) (eds) Science Education in Europe: Critical reflections. A report to the Nuffield Foundation, King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts A (2005) The history of science fiction, London, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papanelopoulou, F, A Nieto-Galan, and E Perdiguero (eds) (2009) Popularizing Science and Technology in the European Periphery, 1800–2000, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price DJ de Solla (1963) Little science, big science, NY, Columbia UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy M (1979) The conduit metaphor, in: Ortony A (ed) Metaphor and thought, 2nd edition, Cambridge, CUP, pp164-201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichvarg D (1993) Science et spectacle. Figure d’une rencontre, Nice, Z’Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rödder, S., Franzen, M. and P. Weingart (eds) The Sciences’ Media Connection – Public Communication and its Repercussions. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 28, Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of Innovation, 1st edition, NY, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohrbach D (2007) The development of knowledge societies in 19 OECD countries between 1970 and 2002, Social Science Information, Vol 46(4), pp. 655–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (1962) Scientist: the story of a word, Annals of Science, 18, 2, 65-85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Royal Society (1985) The Public Understanding of Science. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahoo S (2009) The emergence of modern science and the national movement in India, Science and Culture, Nov-Dec, 394-398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymore-Ure C (1991) The British press and broadcasting since 1945, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapin S (2010) The scientific life – a morel history of late a modern vocation, Chicago, CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele B (2001) Le muse de sciences – montee du modele communicationnel eet recomposition du champ muesal, Paris, L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiele B (2012) Suggesting cultural indicators derived from Exhibitory Science, in: Bauer MW, R Shukla, and Nick Allum (eds) The culture of science – how the public relates to science across the globe, NY, Routledge, pp385-399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shannon C E and W Weaver (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana, University of Illinois Press [original Bell System Technology Journal, 27, 1948, 379ff and 623ff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheets-Pyenson, S (1985) Popular science periodicals in Paris and London: the emergence of low scientific culture 1820-1875, Annals of Science, 42, 549-572

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn T and T Whitley (eds) (1985) Expository Science: forms and functions of popularization, Dordrecht: Reidel

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammut G and MW Bauer (2011) Social Influence: modes and modalities, in: Hook D, B Franks and MW Bauer (eds) The Social Psychology of Communication, London, Palgrave, pp87-106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorokin (1985 [1957]) Social and Cultural dynamics – a study of change in major system of art, truth, ethics, law and social relations, New Brunswick, Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stowasser JM, M Peschenig und F Skutsch (1994) Stowasser Lateinisch-Deutsches Worterbuch, Wien, Verlag Holder-Pichler-Tempsky.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone L (1969) Literacy and education in England, 1640-1900, Past and Present, 42, 69-139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. (2010). Science in the news: A diachronic perspective. Corpora, 5, 221-250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe C & J Gregory (2010): Producing the Post-Fordist Public: The Political Economy of Public Engagement with Science, Science as Culture, 19:3, 273-301

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner FM (1988) The Victorian conflict between science and religion: a professional dimension, in: Parsons G (ed) Religion in Victorian Britain, Vol4: Interpretations, Manchester, MUP, pp170-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench B and M Bucchi et al. (2014) Global Spread of Science Communication: institutions and practices across continents, in: Bucchi M and B Trends (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2nd edition, London, Routledge, pp214-245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trench B (2008) Internet: turning science communication inside-out, in: Bucchi M and B Trends (eds) Routledge Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, 2st edition, London, Routledge, pp185-198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney J (2007) the latest boom in popular science books, in: Bauer MW and M Bucchi (eds) Journalism, Science and Society – Science communication between news and public relations, NY, Routledge, 81-91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valente TW and EM Rogers (1995) The origins and development of the diffusion of innovation paradigm as an example of scientific growth, Science Communication, 156, 3, 242-273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogt C (2012) The spiral of scientific culture and cultural well-being: Brazil and Ibero-America, Public Understanding of Science, 21, 1, 4-16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L 2013) Scientists as Prophets – a rhetorical genealogy, Oxford, OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh L (2015) The double edged sword of popularisation: the role of science communication research and the Popsci.com shutoff, Science Communication, 37, 5, 658-669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner S (1985) Die Entwicklung der exakten Naturwissenschaften von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart. Eine Quantifizierung ihrer Geschicte, Band 1 und 2, Bielefeld, Science Studies Report 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart P (1988) Rasse, Blut und Gene – Geschichte der Eugenik und Rassenhygiene in Deutschland, Frankfurt, Suhrkamp [Reihe Wissenschaft no 1022]

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart P (1998) Science and the media, Research Policy, 27, 869-879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werskey PG (1971) British Scientists and ‘outsider’ politics, Science Studies, 67-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman R (2007) Ancient Roman metaphors for communication, Metaphor and Symbol, 22, 1, 41-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1992) Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science, Public Understanding of science, 1, 3, 281-304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu G and H Qiu (2013) Popular science publishing in contemporary China, Public Understanding of Science, 22, 5, 521-529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (1984) In introduction to science studies – the philosophical and social aspects of science and technology, Cambridge, CUP.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. London, Großbritannien

    Martin W. Bauer

Authors
  1. Martin W. Bauer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin W. Bauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Zürich IPMZ, Zürich, Switzerland

    Heinz Bonfadelli

  2. FWB, Deutsche Universität für Weiterbildung, Berlin, Germany

    Birte Fähnrich

  3. Institut für Medienforschung, Universität Rostock, Rostock, Germany

    Corinna Lüthje

  4. IFG Umwelt, Universität Koblenz-Landau, Landau, Germany

    Jutta Milde

  5. Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Markus Rhomberg

  6. Universität Zürich Inst. für Publizistikwiss., Zürich, Switzerland

    Mike S. Schäfer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, M.W. (2017). Kritische Beobachtungen zur Geschichte der Wissenschaftskommunikation. In: Bonfadelli, H., Fähnrich, B., Lüthje, C., Milde, J., Rhomberg, M., Schäfer, M. (eds) Forschungsfeld Wissenschaftskommunikation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12898-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12897-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12898-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation