Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Überlegungen zu einer experimentellen Ethik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Berechenbarkeit der Welt?

  • 3123 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Artikel werden Perspektiven aufgezeigt, wie Experimente der Sozialwissenschaften, Ökonomik und Psychologie für die Ethik fruchtbar werden können. Als Ergebnis wird ein neues Forschungsfeld „Experimentelle Ethik“ vorgestellt. Forschungsfragen, praktische Implikationen sowie mögliche Kritikpunkte einer experimentellen Ethik werden diskutiert.

This article outlines some perspectives for an „Experimental Ethics“ which makes use of experimental methods from economics and psychology. Central research questions, practical implications as well as possibilities for criticism are discussed.

Prof. Dr. Christoph Lütge ist Inhaber des Peter Löscher-Stiftungslehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der TU München. Gastprofessuren in Venedig, Taipeh und Kyoto. Arbeitsgebiete: Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, Allgemeine Ethik, CSR, Ethik und Internet. Wichtigste Buchveröffentlichungen: Order Ethics or Moral Surplus: What Holds a Society Together? (Lexington 2015), Ethik des Wettbewerbs (Beck 2014), Experimental Ethics (Mithrsg., Palgrave Macmillan 2014), Handbook of the Philosophical Foundations of Business Ethics (Hrsg., Springer 2013).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Alicke, M. & D. Rose. 2012. Culpable Control and Deviant Causal Chains. Personality and Social Psychology Compass 6 (10): 723–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. 1988. Why Free Ride? Strategies and Learning in Public Goods Experiments. Journal of Public Economics 37: 291–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appiah, K. A. 2009. Ethische Experimente: Übungen zum guten Leben. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binmore, K. 2010. Social Norms or Social Preferences?. Mind and Society 9: 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckwalter, W. 2010. Knowledge Isn’t Closed on Saturday: A Study in Ordinary Language. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (3): 395–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T. 1974. Evolutionary Epistemology. In The Philosophy of Karl Popper, Vol. I, ed. Schlipp, Paul A., 413–459. Illinois: La Salle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 2000. Profit over People: Neoliberalismus und globale Weltordnung. Hamburg: Europa Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. 1989. Neurophilosophy – Toward a Unified Science of the Mind/Brain. Bradford Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte-Sponville, A. 2009. Kann Kapitalismus moralisch sein? Zürich: Diogenes.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Cremer, D. & A. E. Tenbrunsel. 2011. Behavioral Business Ethics: Shaping an Emerging Field. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworazik, N. & H. Rusch. 2014. A brief history of Experimental Ethics. In Experimental Ethics: Towards an Empirical Moral Philosophy, Luetge, Rusch und Uhl, 38–56. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk, A. & N. Szech. 2013. Morals and Markets. Science 340: 707–711.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feltz, A. & E. T. Cokely. 2009. Do Judgments About Freedom and Responsibility Depend on Who You Are? Personality Differences in Intuitions About Compatibilism and Incompatibilism. Consciousness and Cognition 18 (1): 342–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., R. B. Sommerville, L. E. Nystrom, J. M. Darley, and J. D. Cohen (2001) ‘An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment’, Science, 293, pp. 2105–2108.


    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. and J. Haidt (2002) ‘How (and Where) Does Moral Judgment Work?’, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 12, pp. 517–523.


    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. 2012. Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment. Cognitive Science 36 (1): 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann, T., J. Horvath & J. Kipper. (Hrsg.). 2014. Die Experimentelle Philosophie in der Diskussion. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, F. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gürerk, Ö., B. Irlenbusch & B. Rockenbach. 2006. The Competitive Advantage of Sanctioning Institutions. Science 312: 108–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homann, K. & C. Lütge. 2013. Einführung in die Wirtschaftsethik (3. Aufl.). Münster: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huebner, B., M. Bruno & H. Sarkissian. 2010. What Does the Nation of China Think About Phenomenal States? Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2): 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inbar, Y., D. A. Pizarro, J. Knobe & Bloom, P. 2009. Disgust Sensitivity Predicts Intuitive Disapproval of Gays. Emotion 9 (3): 435–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauernig, J., M. Uhl & C. Luetge. 2016. Losers under suppression, winners under crossfire. An experiment on punishment after competition. Erscheint in: Journal of Economic Psychology.


    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, G. 2013. The Armchair and the Trolley: An Argument for Experimental Ethics. Philosophical Studies 162 (2): 421–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. 1993. The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. 2003. Intentional Action and Side Effects in Ordinary Language. Analysis 63: 190–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. 2005. Ordinary Ethical Reasoning and the Ideal of ‘Being Yourself ’. Philosophical Psychology 18 (3): 327–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. 2007. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Significance. Philosophical Explorations 10 (2): 119–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. 2009. Folk Judgments of Causation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (2): 238–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobe, J. & S. Nichols, ed. 2008. Experimental Philosophy. New York: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levati, M. V., M. Uhl & R. Zultan. 2014. Imperfect Recall and Time Inconsistencies: An Experimental Test of the Absentminded Driver ‘Paradox’”. International Journal of Game Theory 43: 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. 2001. Ökonomische Wissenschaftstheorie. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. 2003. Philosophie als Interface der Wissenschaften. In Kaltblütig: Philosophie von einem rationalen Standpunkt, hrsg. W. Buschlinger und C. Lütge, 69–79. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. 2004. Economics in Philosophy of Science: Can the Dismal Science Contribute Anything Interesting? Synthese 140 (3): 279–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. 2007. Was hält eine Gesellschaft zusammen? Ethik im Zeitalter der Globalisierung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. 2014. Ethik des Wettbewerbs: Über Konkurrenz und Moral. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. 2015. What Holds a Society Together? Order Ethics vs. Moral Surplus. Lanham, Md.: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. & N. Mukerji, ed. 2016. Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy. Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C. & H. Rusch. 2013. The Systematic Place of Morals in Markets: Comment on Armin Falk & Nora Szech “Morals and Markets”, Science 341 (6147): 714.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luetge, C., H. Rusch & M. Uhl, ed. 2014. Experimental Ethics: Towards an Empirical Moral Philosophy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütge, C. & G. Vollmer, Hrsg. 2004. Fakten statt Normen? Zur Rolle einzelwissenschaftlicher Argumente in einer naturalistischen Ethik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainzer, K. 2008. Komplexität. Paderborn: UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, J., W. Sinnott-Armstrong, J. G. Hull & A. Zimmerman. 2010. Practical Interests, Relevant Alternatives, and Knowledge Attributions: An Empirical Study. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1 (2): 265–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. 2006. Folk Intuitions on Free Will. Journal of Cognition and Culture 6: 57–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I. 2009a. Moral als Produktionsfaktor. Ordonomische Schriften zur Unternehmensethik. Berlin: wvb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I. 2009b. Moral als Heuristik. Ordonomische Schriften zur Wirtschaftsethik. Berlin: wvb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Precht, R. 2010. Die Kunst, kein Egoist zu sein. Warum wir gerne gut sein wollen und was uns davon abhält. München: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, H. & C. Lütge. 2016. Spillovers From Coordination to Cooperation: Evidence for the Interdependence Hypothesis from the Lab. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences 10(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rusch, H., C. Luetge & E. Voland. 2014. Evolutionäre und Experimentelle Ethik: eine neue Synthese in der Moralphilosophie? In Bereichsethiken im interdisziplinären Dialog, hrsg. M. Maring, 163–179. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. 1967 (Orig. 1912). Probleme der Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E., E. T. Cokely & A. Feltz. 2011. Persistent Bias in Expert Judgments About Free Will and Moral Responsibility: A Test of the Expertise Defense. Consciousness and Cognition 20 (4): 1722–1731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. 2009. Do Ethicists Steal more Books? Philosophical Psychology 22: 711–725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwitzgebel, E. 2014. The moral behavior of ethicists and the role of the philosopher. In Experimental Ethics: Towards an Empirical Moral Philosophy, Luetge, Rusch und Uhl, 59–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohminger, N., B. Caldwell, D. Cameron, J. Schaich Borg & W. Sinnott-Armstrong. 2014. Implicit Morality: A Methodological Survey. In Experimental Ethics: Towards an Empirical Moral Philosophy, Luetge, Rusch und Uhl, 133–156. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. L. 2008. Rationality in Economics: Constructivist and Ecological Forms. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek, A. 2001. Ökonomische Ethik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck (UTB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, G. 1975, 1998. Evolutionäre Erkenntnistheorie. 7. Aufl. Stuttgart: Hirzel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigel, C. 2012. Experimental Evidence for Free Will Revisionism. Philosophical Explorations 16 (1): 31–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. 1986. The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (1): 110–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. 1992. Group Size and Provision of a Sanctioning System in a Social Dilemma. In Social dilemmas. Theoretical issues and research findings, hrsg. Liebrand, W. B. G., Messick, D. M. und Wilke, H. A. M, 267–287. Oxford: Pergamon Press (International series in experimental social psychology, 25).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. & K. Sato. 1986. Motivational bases of the public goods problem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (1): 67–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität München, München, Deutschland

    Christoph Lütge

Authors
  1. Christoph Lütge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Lütge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. TU München, München, Germany

    Wolfgang Pietsch

  2. TU München, München, Germany

    Jörg Wernecke

  3. Anstalt für Kommunale Datenverarbeitung, München, Bayern, Germany

    Maximilian Ott

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lütge, C. (2017). Überlegungen zu einer experimentellen Ethik. In: Pietsch, W., Wernecke, J., Ott, M. (eds) Berechenbarkeit der Welt?. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12153-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-12153-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-12152-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-12153-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation