Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Moralpolitik

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbuch Policy-Forschung

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag führt in die Analyse moralpolitischer Entwicklungen aus Sicht der Policy-Analyse ein. Zunächst werden unterschiedliche definitorische Zugänge zum Feld der Moralpolitik kontrastiert sowie häufig untersuchte abhängige Variablen vorgestellt. Im Anschluss folgt eine vergleichende Deskription ausgewählter moralpolitischer Entwicklungen. Bevor der Beitrag mit einem kurzen Fazit endet, wird noch die Erklärungskraft unterschiedlicher Faktoren für diese – und andere – moralpolitische Entwicklungen diskutiert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/deutschland-ehe-idDEKBN19L11D.

  2. 2.

    Diese Aufzählung ist jedoch keinesfalls als vollständig zu verstehen.

  3. 3.

    https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/ehe-fuer-alle-115.html.

  4. 4.

    https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/angela-merkel-ehe-fuer-alle-fuer-merkels-ehe-mit-allen-kommentar-a-1154595.html.

  5. 5.

    Forschung, die sich moralpolitischem Framing als abhängiger Variable widmet und als fünfter Schwerpunkt betrachtet werden kann, wurde oben bereits diskutiert und bleibt in diesem Abschnitt aufgrund der Policy-Fokussierung des Beitrags außen vor.

  6. 6.

    Belgien (BE), Dänemark (DK), Deutschland (DE), Finnland (FIN), Frankreich (FR), Griechenland (GRE), Großbritannien (GB), Irland (IRE), Israel (ISR), Italien (ITA), Niederlande (NL), Norwegen (NOR), Österreich (AT), Polen (PL), Portugal (POR), Schweden (SWE), Schweiz (CH), Spanien (ES), Türkei (TK).

  7. 7.

    In Schweden gilt dies, solange dieser nicht von Ärzten durchgeführt wird.

  8. 8.

    Die folgende Zusammenfassung der typisch verwendeten Erklärungsgrößen basiert im Wesentlichen auf Heichel et al. (2013).

Literatur

  • Abou-Chadi, Tarik, und Ryan Finnigan. 2018. Rights for same-sex couples and public attitudes toward gays and lesbians in Europe. Comparative Political Studies 52(6): 868–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Christian, Stephan Grohs, und Christoph Knill. 2020a. Discrimination based on political beliefs: A field experiment on the freedom of assembly. Public Policy and Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076720905012.

  • Adam, Christian, Christoph Knill, und Emma T. Budde. 2020b. How morality politics determine morality policy output – Partisan effects on morality policy change. Journal of European Public Policy 27(7): 1015–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Christian, Steffen Hurka, und Christoph Knill. 2017. Four styles of regulation and their implications for comparative policy analysis. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice 19(4): 327–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adam, Christian, und Andreas Raschzok. 2017. Cannabis policy and the uptake of treatment for cannabis-related problems. Drug and Alcohol Review 36(2): 171–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albaek, Erik. 2003. Political ethics and public policy : Homosexuals between moral dilemmas and political considerations in Danish parliamentary debates. Scandinavian Political Studies 26(3): 245–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asal, Victor, Mitchell Brown, und Renee Gibson Figueroa. 2008. Structure, empowerment and the liberalization of cross-national abortion rights. Politics and Gender 4(2): 265–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, Thomas. 2005. Path dependence and value-driven issues: The comparative politics of stem cell research. World Politics 57(2): 200–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, Nicola, und Daniel Monk. 2015. From civil partnership to same-sex marriage. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Markus, Marc Debus, und Jochen Müller. 2013. Das legislative Verhalten von Bundestagsabgeordneten zwischen persönlichen Charakteristika, Wahlkreisinteressen und Parteilinie: Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Auseinandersetzung um die Präimplantationsdiagnostik. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 23(2): 177–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Markus, Marc Debus, und Jochen Müller. 2015. Personal characteristics of MPs and legislative behavior in moral policymaking. Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(2): 179–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blofield, Merike. 2006. The politics of moral sin: Abortion and divorce in Spain, Chile and Argentina. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, Feler. 2021. Policy innovativeness and sexual freedom. Social Science Quarterly 102(4): 1496–1510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budde, Emma, Stephan Heichel, Steffen Hurka, und Christoph Knill. 2018. Partisan effects in morality policy making. European Journal of Political Research 57(2): 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burlone, Nathalie, und Rebecca G. Richmond. 2018. Between morality and rationality: framing end-of-life care policy through narratives. Policy Sciences 51(3): 313–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, Gene. 2005. The moral veto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Calfano, Brian R. 2010. The power of brand: Beyond interest group influence in U.S. state abortion politics. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10(3): 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmines, Edward G., Jessica C. Gerrity, und Michael W. Wagner. 2010. How abortion became a partisan issue: Media coverage of the interest group-political party connection. Politics & Policy 38(6): 1135–1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, Jose. 2009. Europas Angst vor der Religion. Berlin: BVA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 1994. On religion and public policy: Does Catholicism make a difference? European Journal of Political Research 25(1): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney, Paul. 2013. Institutionally homophobic? Political parties and the substantive representation of LGBT people: Westminster and regional UK elections 1945–2011. Policy & Politics 41(1): 101–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Seo-Young, Axel Dreher, und Eric Neumayer. 2013. Does legalized prostitution increase human trafficking? World Development 41(1): 67–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chressanthis, George A., Kathie S. Gilbert, und Paul W. Grimes. 1991. Ideology, constituent interests, and senatorial voting: The case of abortion. Social Science Quarterly 72(3): 588–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, Charles T., und Philip J. Cook. 1989. Selling hope: State lotteries in America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, Philip. 1998. Unbridled passions? Free votes, issues of conscience and the accountability of British members of parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies 4(2): 70–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Effertz, Tobias, Anja Bischof, Hans-Jürgen Rumpf, Christian Meyer, und Ulrich John. 2018. The effect of online gambling on gambling problems and resulting economic health costs in Germany. The European Journal of Health Economics 19(7): 967–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engeli, Isabelle, Christoffer Green-Pedersen, und Lars Thorup Jansen. 2012. Morality politics in Western Europe. Parties, agendas, and policy choices. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engeli, Isabelle, und Christine Rothmayr Allison. 2013. Diverging against all Odds? Regulatory paths in Embryonic Stem Cell Research across Western Europe. Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engler, Fabian, und Kathrin Dümig. 2017. Political parties and MPs’ morality policy voting behaviour: Evidence from Germany. Parliamentary Affairs 70(3): 548–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epp, Charles R. 1998. The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Euchner, Eva-Maria. 2019. Ruling under a shadow of moral hierarchy: Regulatory intermediaries in the governance of prostitution. Regulation & Governance: Early View. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12294.

  • Euchner, Eva-Maria, Stephan Heichel, Kerstin Nebel, und Andreas Raschzok. 2013. From ‘morality’ policy to ‘normal’ policy: Framing of drug consumption and gambling in Germany and the Netherlands and their regulatory consequences. Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 372–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, Susana Aguilar. 2012. Fighting against the moral agenda of Zapatero’s socialist government (2004–2011): The Spanish Catholic Church as a political contender. Politics and Religion 5(3): 671–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraiolo, Kathleen. 2013. Is State gambling policy “morality policy”? Framing debates over state lotteries. Policy Studies Journal 41(2): 217–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fine, Johanna B., Katharine Mayall, und Lilian Sepúlveda. 2017. The role of international human rights norms in the liberalization of abortion laws globally. Health and Human Rights Journal 19(1): 69–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, Simon. 2008. Politics as usual or bringing religion back in? The influene of parties, institutions, economic interests and religion on embryo research policies. Comparative Political Studies 41(12): 1631–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gindulis, Edith. 2002. Die Abtreibungsregime der OECD-Länder und ihre Bestimmungsfaktoren im Vergleich. Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft 31(3): 315–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Githens, Marianne, und Dorothy Stetson. 1996. Abortion politics: Public policy in cross-cultural perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glendon, Mary A. 1986. Abortion and divorce in Western law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2007. The conflict of conflicts in comparative perspective. Euthanasia as a political issue in Denmark, Belgium, and the Netherlands. Comparative Politics 39(3): 273–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, und Conor Little. 2021. Without enemies, without friends. Morality policies, the Roman Catholic Church, and Ireland’s ‘secular’ party system. Journal of European Public Policy 28(9): 1391–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, John, Heleen Weyers, und Maurice Adams. 2008. Euthanasia and law in Europe. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grohs, Stephan. 2020. Contested boundaries: The moralization and politicization of prostitution in German cities. European Urban and Regional Studies 27(2): 156–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzymala-Busse, Anna. 2015. Weapons of the meek: How churches influence public policy. World Politics 68(1): 1–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, Donald P., und Matthew S. Kaufman. 2006. Public opinion and policy making in the culture wars: Is there a connection between opinion and state policy on gay and lesbian issues? In Public Opinion in State Politics, Hrsg. Jeffrey E. Cohen, 163–182. Kalifornien: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haider-Markel, Donald P., und Kenneth J. Meier. 1996. The politics of gay and lesbian rights: Expanding the scope of the conflict. The Journal of Politics 58(2): 332–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Wayne, und Michael Lynskey. 2020. Assessing the public health impacts of legalizing recreational cannabis use: the US experience. World Psychiatry 19(2): 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heichel, Stephan, Christoph Knill, und Sophie Schmitt. 2013. Public policy meets morality: Conceptual and theoretical challenges in the analysis of morality policy change. Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 318–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heichel, Stephan, und Adrian Rinscheid. 2014. Liberalisierung in drei Schritten: Die Regulierung von Homosexualität zwischen 1960 und 2010. In Moralpolitik in Deutschland: Staatliche Regulierung gesellschaftlicher Wertekonflikte im historischen und internationalen Vergleich, Hrsg. Christoph Knill, Kerstin Nebel und Caroline Preidel, 127–146. Wiesbaden: VS Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, Anja, Michael Minkenberg, und Zeynep Yanasmayan. 2018. Die Rückkehr von Religion in die Öffentlichkeit. Zur Analyse von Grenzverschiebungen zwischen Religion und Politik am Beispiel Frankreichs und Italien. In Das Narrativ von der Wiederkehr der Religion, Schriftenreihe: Politik und Religion, Hrsg. Holger Zapf, Oliver Hidalgo und W. Hildmann Philipp, 197–230. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, Achim, Eva-Maria Trüdinger, und Sebastian Jäckle. 2017. Sooner or later: the influence of public opinion and religiosity on the enactment of laws recognizing same-sex unions. Journal of European Public Policy 24(8): 1191–1210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, Steffen, Christian Adam, und Christoph Knill. 2017. Is morality policy different? Testing sectoral and institutional explanations of policy change. Policy Studies Journal 45(4): 688–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, Steffen, und Christoph Knill. 2020. Does regulation matter? A cross-national analysis of the impact of gun policies on homicide and suicide rates. Regulation & Governance 14(4): 787–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurka, Steffen, Christoph Knill, und Léonie Rivière. 2018. Four worlds of morality politics: the impact of institutional venues and party cleavages. West European Politics 41(2): 428–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, Ronald. 2008. Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. West European Politics 31(1): 130–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaenicke, Douglas W. 2002. Abortion and partisanship in the US congress 1976-2000: Increasing partisan cohesion and differentiation. Journal of American Studies 36(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Jason L. 2003. Policy diffusion through institutional legitimation: State lotteries. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13(4): 521–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, Thomas M. 2009. Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights. Law & Society Review 43(1): 151–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph. 2013. The study of morality policy: Analytical implications from a public policy perspective. Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 309–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph, Christian Adam, und Steffen Hurka. 2015. On the road to permissiveness? Change and convergence of moral regulation in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Knill, Christoph, Caroline Preidel, und Kerstin Nebel. 2014. Brake rather than barrier: The impact of the Catholic Church on morality policies in Western Europe. West European Politics 37(5): 845–866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreitzer, Rebecca J., Kellen A. Kane, und Christopher Z. Mooney. 2019. The evolution of morality policy debate: Moralization and demoralization. The Forum 17(1): 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Penny. 2007. Assisted dying and legal change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lowi, Theodore J. 1972. Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review 32(4): 298–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutter, Mark. 2010. Zur Erklärung von Diffusionsprozessen. Das Beispiel der Einführung staatlicher Lotterien in den USA. Zeitschrift für Soziologie 39(5): 363–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Materstvedt, Lars J., und Stein Kaasa. 2002. Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Scandinavia – with a conceptual suggestion regarding international research in relation to the phenomena. Palliative Medicine 16(1): 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medoff, Marshall H. 2008. The spillover effects of restrictive abortion laws. Gender Issues 25(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkel, Wolfgang. 2021. Neue Krisen. Wissenschaft, Moralisierung und die Demokratie im 21. Jahrhundert. APuZ – Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 26/27:4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Sarah, Laura R. Wherry, und Diana Greene Foster. 2020. The economic consequences of being denied an abortion. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Papers Working Paper 26662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2002. Religion and public policy: Institutional, cultural, and political impact on the shaping of abortion policies in Western democracies. Comparative Political Studies 35(2): 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minkenberg, Michael. 2003. The policy impact of church-state relations: Familiy policy and abortion in Britain, France, and Germany. West European Politics 26(1): 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Christopher Z. 1999. The politics of morality policy. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 675–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. The public clash of private values: The politics of morality policy. New York: Chatham House Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Christopher Z., und Mei-Hsein Lee. 2000. The influence of values on consensus and contentious morality policy: U.S. death penalty reform, 1956–82. Journal of Politics 62(1): 223–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mooney, Christopher Z., und Richard G. Schuldt. 2008. Does morality policy exist? Testing a basic assumption. Policy Studies Journal 36(2): 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mucciaroni, Gary. 2011. Are debates about “morality policy” really about morality? Framing opposition to gay and lesbian rights. Policy Studies Journal 39(2): 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebel, Kerstin, und Steffen Hurka. 2015. Abortion: finding the impossible compromise. In On the road to permissiveness? Change and convergence of moral regulation in Europe, Hrsg. Christoph Knill, Christian Adam und Steffen Hurka, 58–78. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser, Christian, und Christian Seidel. 2020. Kritik des Moralismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norrander, Barbara, und Clyde Wilcox. 1999. Public opinion and policymaking in the states: the case of post-roe abortion policy. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 707–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, Maureen R. 2009. Agenda setting and state policy diffusion: The effects of media attention, state court decisions, and policy learning on fetal killing policy. Social Science Quarterly 90(1): 164–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldmixon, Elizabeth A. 2002. Culture wars in the congressional theater: How the U.S. House of Representatives legislates morality, 1993–1998. Social Science Quarterly 83(3): 775–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outshoorn, Joyce. 2004. The politics of prostitution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Overby, Marvin L., Raymond Tatalovich, und Donley T. Studlar. 1998. Party and free votes in Canada: Abortion in the House of Commons. Party Politics 4(3): 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettinicchio, David. 2012. Current explanations for the variation in same-sex marriage policies in Western Countries. Comparative Sociology 11(4): 526–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, Gert. 2018. Öffentlicher Bedeutungsgewinn von Religion und doch Säkularisierung? In Das Narrativ von der Wiederkehr der Religion. Politik und Religion. Hrsg. Holger Zapf, Oliver Hidalgo und Philipp W. Hildmann, 157–196. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, Patrick A., und Donald E. Miller. 1999. Variations in the diffusion of state lottery adoptions: How revenue dedication changes morality politics. Policy Studies Journal 27(4): 696–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierceson, Jason, Adriana Piatti-Crocker, und Shawn Schulenberg. 2010. Same-sex marriage in the Americas: Policy innovation for same-sex relationships. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preidel, Caroline, und Christoph Knill. 2015. Euthanasia: Different moves towards punitive permissiveness. In On the road to permissiveness? Change and convergence of moral regulation in Europe, Hrsg. Christoph Knill, Christian Adam und Steffen Hurka, 79–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roh, Jongho, und Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2003. All politics is not local: National forces in state abortion initiatives. Social Science Quarterly 84(1): 15–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawer, Marian. 2012. What makes the substantive representation of women possible in a Westminster parliament? The story of RU486 in Australia. International Political Science Review 33(3): 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schacht, Lena S. 2020. Die katholische Kirche als Vetospieler in der Moralpolitik. In Religion, Ethik und Politik: Auf der Suche nach der guten Ordnung, Hrsg. Stefanie Hammer und Oliver Hidalgo, 243–267. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Sophie, Eva-Maria Euchner, und Caroline Preidel. 2013. Regulating prostitution and same-sex marriage in Italy and Spain: the interplay of political and societal veto players in two catholic societies. Journal of European Public Policy 20(3): 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, Tanjev. 2021. Moralisierung und Meinungsfreiheit. UFITA 85(1): 6–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Mildred A., und Raymond Tatalovich. 2009. Cultural and institutional factors affecting political contention over moral issues. Comparative Sociology 8(1): 76–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Mildred A., und Raymond Tatalovich. 2019. Public opinion and morality policy: Lessons from Canada and the United States. Comparative Sociology 18(1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwörer, Jakob, und Belén Fernández-García. 2021. Religion on the rise again? A longitudinal analysis of religious dimensions in election manifestos of Western European parties. Party Politics 27(6): 1160–1171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Scott N., Stuart J. Turnbull-Dugarte, und Brian A. Olinger. 2021. Where is the party? Explaining positions on same-sex marriage in Europe among would-be members of parliament. European Journal of Politics and Gender. https://doi.org/10.1332/251510821X16267702086451.

  • Siegel, Scott N., und Yiqian A. Wang. 2018. Broken rainbows: The Partisan politics of marriage equality in Europe. European Politics and Society 19(4): 377–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Miriam. 2005. Social movements and judicial empowerment: Courts, public policy, and lesbian and gay organization in Canada. Politics & Society 33(2): 327–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Miriam. 2008. Political institutions and lesbian and gay rights in the United States and Canada. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spieker, Manfred. 2008. Kirche und Abtreibung in Deutschland. Paderborn: Schöningh.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steunenberg, Bernard. 1997. Courts, cabinet and coalition parties: The politics of euthanasia in a parliamentary setting. British Journal of Political Science 27(4): 551–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Studlar, Donley T., und Alessandro Cagossi. 2018. Institutions and morality policy in Western democracies. Review of Policy Research 35(2): 61–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatalovich, Raymond. 2020. Morality politics of physician-assisted suicide: Comparing Canada and the United States. International Journal of Canadian Studies 57(2): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatalovich, Raymond, und Byron W. Daynes. 2011. Moral controversies in American politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Jami K., Donald P. Haider-Markel, und Benjamin Rogers. 2019. Toward a new measure of state-level LGBT interest group strength. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 19(3): 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hees, Martin van, und Bernard Steunenberg. 2000. The choices judges make: Court rulings, personal values, and legal constraints. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(3): 305–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Carolyn M. 2000. Confessions of an interest group: The Catholic Church and political parties in Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wendell, Dane G., und Raymond Tatalovich. 2021. Classifying public policies with Moral Foundations Theory. Policy Sciences 54(1): 155–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, Georg, und Sabrina Fehrenz. 2018. Die Union Und Die „Ehe Für Alle“. Bestimmungsfaktoren Des Abstimmungsverhaltens in Der CDU/CSU-Fraktion Im Bundestag. Zeitschrift Für Parlamentsfragen. 49(3): 512–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapf, Holger, Oliver Hidalgo, und Philipp W. Hildmann. 2018. Das Narrativ von der Wiederkehr der Religion. Politik und Religion. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, Mary. 2020. Abortion and the law in America: A legal history, Roe v. Wade to the present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Zeppelin Universität, Friedrichshafen, Deutschland

    Christian Adam

  2. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Deutschland

    Christoph Knill

  3. München, Deutschland

    Stephan Heichel

Authors
  1. Christian Adam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christoph Knill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephan Heichel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Adam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Sozialwissenschaften, Technische Universität Kaiserlautern, Kaiserslautern, Rheinland-Pfalz, Deutschland

    Georg Wenzelburger

  2. Institut für Politische Wissenschaft, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Baden-Württemberg, Deutschland

    Reimut Zohlnhöfer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Adam, C., Knill, C., Heichel, S. (2022). Moralpolitik. In: Wenzelburger, G., Zohlnhöfer, R. (eds) Handbuch Policy-Forschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05678-0_31-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-05678-0_31-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-05678-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-05678-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Referenz Sozialwissenschaften und Recht

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation