Zusammenfassung
Innovationen in der betrieblichen Lebenswelt sind soziale Prozesse der Ideenentwicklung und der praktischen Umsetzung. Die Entstehung von Neuem ist dabei auf Interaktions- und Entscheidungsprozesse angewiesen. Zunehmend werden hierfür Teams eingesetzt mit der Aufgabe, Wissen zu generieren, zu verarbeiten und daraus Innovationen zu entwickeln. Aufgrund der Komplexität des Gegenstands und der Verteilung des Wissens auf unterschiedliche Akteure wird diese Aufgabe zur Herausforderung, auch damit verbundene Konflikte zu bearbeiten. Hierfür wurden in der Sozial- und Organisationspsychologie Methoden entwickelt, die aber in der Praxis noch wenig Anwendung finden. Eine dieser Methoden ist die Konstruktive Kontroverse. Sie ist ein Verfahren zur Integration von Wissen aus unterschiedlichen Perspektiven und zur Konfliktbearbeitung. In diesem Beitrag wird die Anschlussfähigkeit der Konstruktiven Kontroverse an Innovation in theoretischer Hinsicht untersucht und dokumentiert.
„If there is any secret of success, it lies in the ability to get the other person‘s point of view and see things from his/her angle as well as from your own.“
Henry Ford
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Die US-Medien sprachen in Anlehnung an den Watergate-Skandal von „Antennagate“.
Literatur
de Alencar, E. M. L. S. (2012). Creativity in organizations: Facilitators and inhibitors. In M. Mumford (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational creativity (S. 87–111). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Hrsg.), Research in organizational behavior (Bd. 10, S. 123–167). Greenwich: JAI Press.
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder: Westview.
Amason, A. (1996). Distinguishing effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.
Amason, A. C., Thompson, K., Hochwarter, W., & Harrison, A. (1995). Conflict: An important dimension of successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 20–34.
Anderson, N., & Costa, A. C. (Hrsg.). (2010). Innovation and knowledge management (Bd. 1–4). London: Sage.
Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-art-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Aristoteles. (2011). Die Nikomachische Ethik. Düsseldorf: Artemis & Winkler.
Armenakis, A. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (1999). Organizational change: A review of theory and research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25, 293–315.
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (2010). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. In N. Anderson & A. C. Costa (Hrsg.), Innovation and knowledge management (Bd. 1, S. 3–40). London: Sage.
Basadur, M. (1995). The power of innovation. London: Pitman Publishing.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. New York: Ballantine.
Berkel, K. (1984). Konfliktforschung und Konfliktbewältigung. Ein organisationspsychologischer Ansatz. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Berlyne, D. E. (1966). Notes on intrinsic motivation and intrinsic reward in relation to instruction. In J. Bruner (Hrsg.), Learning about learning (S. 105–110). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.
Bledow, R., Frese, M., Anderson, N., Erez, M., & Farr, J. (2009). A dialectical perspective on innovation: Conflicting demands, multiple pathways and ambidexterity. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2, 305–337.
Chen, G., & Tjosvold, D. (2002). Cooperative goals and constructive controversy for promoting innovation in student groups in China. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 46–50.
Chen, G., Liu, C. H., & Tjosvold, D. (2005a). Conflict management for effective top management teams and innovation in China. Journal of Management Studies, 42, 277–300.
Chen, Y. F., Tjosvold, D., & Su, S. F. (2005b). Goal interdependence for working across cultural boundaries: Chinese employees with foreign managers. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 429–447.
Chen, G., Sharma, P. N., Edinger, S. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Farh, J. L. (2011). Motivating and demotivating forces in teams: Cross-Level influences of empowering leadership and relationship conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 541–557.
Chen, X.-H., Liu, X., & Wu, D. D. (2012). Improving employees’ job satisfaction and innovation performance using conflict management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 23, 151–172.
Chi, N.-W., Huang, Y.-M., & Lin, S.-C. (2009). A double-edged sword? Exploring the curvilinear relationship. Between organizational tenure diversity and team innovation: The moderating role of team-oriented HR practice. Group & Organization Management, 34, 698–726.
Collins, M. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cronin, M. A., & Weingart, L. R. (2007). Representational gaps, information processing, and conflict in functionally diverse teams. Academy of Management Review, 32, 761–773.
Denning, P. J., & Dunham, R. P. (2010). The innovator’s way. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 3, 237–263.
Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Hrsg.). (2006). The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Dick, M. (2005). Organisationales Lernen. In F. Rauner (Hrsg.), Handbuch Berufsbildungsforschung (S. 299–307). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.
De Clercq, D., Thongpapanl, N., & Dimov, D. (2009). When good conflict gets better and bad conflict becomes worse: The role of social capital in the conflict–innovation relationship. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37, 283–297.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32, 83–107.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2008a). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, funcions, and dynamics across multiple levels of analysis. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Hrsg.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management (S. 3–54). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (Hrsg.). (2008b). The psychology of conflict and conflict management. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & de Vries, N. K. (1997). Minority dissent in organizations. In C. K. W. de Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Hrsg.), Using conflict in organizations (S. 72–86). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003a). A contingency theory of task conflict and performance in groups and organizational teams. In M. A. West, D. Tjosvold, & K. G. Smith (Hrsg.), Organizational teamwork and cooperative working (S. 151–166). Chichester: Wiley.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003b). Task versus relationship conflict and team effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 1191–1201.
De Dreu, C. K. W., Harinck, F., & Van Vianen, A. E. M. (1999). Conflict and performance in groups and organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. Robertson (Hrsg.), International review of industrial and organizational psychology (Bd. 14, S. 369–414). Chichester: Wiley.
Ehie, I. C. (2010). The impact of conflict on manufactoring decisions and company performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 126, 145–157.
Follett, M. P. (1940). Constructive conflict. In H. C. Metcalf & L. Urwick (Hrsg.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (S. 30–49). New York: Harper.
Gebert, D., Boerner, S., & Lanwehr, R. (2003). The risks of autonomy – Empirical evidence for the necessity of a balance management in promoting organizational innovativeness. Creativity and innovation management, 12(1), 41–49.
Gelfand, M. J., & Brett, J. M. (2004). The handbook of negotiation and culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Bauchentscheidungen. Die Intelligenz des Unbewussten und die Macht der Intuition. München: Bertelsmann.
Glasl, F. (2010). Konfliktmanagement (8. Aufl.). Bern: Haupt.
Gobeli, D. H., Koenig, H. F., & Bechinger, I. (1998). Managing conflict in software development teams: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15, 423–435.
Greer, L., Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2008). Conflict transformation: A longitudinal study investigation of relationships between different types of intragroup conflict and the moderating role of conflict resolution. Small Group Research, 39(3), 278–303.
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Habermas, J. (1998). Wahrheitstheorien. In J. Habermas (Hrsg.), Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (S. 127–186). Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1128–1145.
Hunt, J. (1954). Introduction: Revisiting montessori. In M. Montessori (Hrsg.), The Montessori method (S. xi–xxxix). New York: Shocken Books (1964).
Isaacson, W. (2011). Steve Jobs. München: Bertelsmann.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. K. W. de Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Hrsg.), Using conflict in organizations (S. 87–100). London: Sage.
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-output relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, 25, 187–242.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238–251.
Jehn, K., Northcraft, G., & Neale, M. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1979). Conflict in the classroom: Controversy and teaching. Review of Educational Research, 49, 51–69.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 285–358.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). The instructional power of conflict. Educational Researcher, 38, 37–51.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2012). Creative controversy: Intellectual challenge in the classroom (5. Aufl.). Edina: Interaction Book Company.
Johnson, D. W., & Tjosvold, D. (1989). Constructive controversy: The key to effective decision-making. In D. Tjosvold & D. W. Johnson (Hrsg.), Productive conflict management: Perspectives for organizations (S. 41–61). New York: Irvington.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Stanne, M. B. (2000). Cooperative learning methods: A meta-analysis. http://www.tablelearning.com/uploads/File/EXHIBIT-B.pdf. Zugegriffen: 30. Jan. 2013.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Tjosvold, D. (2006). Constructive controversy. In M. Deutsch, P. T. Coleman, & E. C. Marcus (Hrsg.), The handbook of conflict resolution. Theory and practice (S. 69–91). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kerschreiter, R., Frey, D., & Streicher, B. (2005). Entwicklungsperspektiven der Sozialpsychologie: Herausforderungen für das nächste Jahrzehnt. In E. H. Witte (Hrsg.), Entwicklungsperspektiven der Sozialpsychologie (S. 25–43). Lengerich: Papst-Verlag.
King, N., Anderson, N., & West, M. A. (1992). Organizational innovation: A case study of perceptions and processes. Work and Stress, 5, 331–339.
Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of Gestalt psychology. New York: Hartcourt, Brace.
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive-development approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Hrsg.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (S. 347–480). Skokie: Rand McNally.
Lee, L.T.-S. (2011). The effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on unlearning and NPD success: The moderating role of team conflict. African Journal of Business Managemen, 5(5), 1843–1856.
Lewicki, R. J., Hiam, A., & Olander, K. W. (1998). Verhandeln mit Strategie: Das große Handbuch der Verhandlungstechniken. St. Gallen: Midas.
Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Lu, J. F., Tjosvold, D., & Shi, K. (2010). Team training in China: Testing and applying the theory of cooperation and competition. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 101–134.
Lu, L., Zhou, F., & Leung, K. (2011). Effects of task and relationship conflicts on individual work behaviors. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22, 131–150.
Luckner, A. (2008). Erwägen als Moment klugen Handelns. In G. Jüttemann (Hrsg.), Suchprozesse der Seele. Die Psychologie des Erwägens (S. 154–162). Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.
Maier, N. R. F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups. Belmont: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
Maier, G. W., Prange, C., & von Rosenstiel, L. (2001a). Psychological perspectives on organizational learning. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (S. 14–34). New York: Oxford University Press.
Maier, G. W., Frey, D., Schulz-Hardt, S., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2001b). Innovation. In G. Wenninger (Hrsg.), Lexikon der Psychologie (Bd. 2, S. 264–267). Frankfurt a. M.: Spektrum.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organization learning. Organization Science, 2, 71–87.
Marinova, D., & Phillimore, J. (2003). Models of innovation. In L. V. Shavinina (Hrsg.), The international handbook on innovation (S. 44–53). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mayntz, R. (1993). Große technische Systeme und ihre gesellschaftstheoretische Bedeutung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 45, 97–108.
Meyer, B., & Scholl, W. (2009). Complex problem solving after unstructured discussion: Effects of information distribution and experience. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 12, 495–515.
Miron, E., Erez, M., & Naveh, E. (2004). Do personal characteristics and cultural values that promote innovation, quality, and efficiency compete with or complement each other? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 175–199.
Mitchel, R., Nicholas, S., & Boyle, B. (2009). The role of openness to cognitive diversity and group processes in knowledge creation. Small Group Research, 40, 535–554.
Mohr, L. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Franzisco: Jossey-Bass.
Montada, L., & Kals, E. (2007). Mediation. Ein Lehrbuch auf psychologischer Grundlage (2. Aufl.). Weinheim: Beltz.
Mumford, M. (Hrsg.). (2012). Handbook of organizational creativity. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4(2), 91–122.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of „Ba“: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40, 40–54.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Byosière, P. (2001). A Theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (S. 491–517). New York: Oxford University Press.
Nonaka, I., von Krogh, G., & Voelpel, S. (2006). Organizational knowledge creation theory: Evolutionary paths and future advances. Organization Studies, 27, 1179–1208.
Paletz, S. B. F., & Schunn, C. D. (2010). A Social-cognitive framework of multidisciplinary team innovation. Topics in Cognitive Science, 2, 73–95.
Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49, 237–262.
Pearce, C. I., & Ensley, M. D. (2004). A reciprocal and longitudinal investigation of the innovation process: The central role of shared vision in product and process innovation teams (PPITs). Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 259–278.
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. New York: Harcourt.
Poole, M. S. (2004). Central issues in the study of change and innovation. In M. S. Poole & A. H. Van de Ven (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational change and innovation (S. 3–31). New York: Oxford University Press.
Poole, M. S., Van de Ven, A. H., Dooley, K., & Holmes, M. E. (2000). Organizational change and innovation processes: Theory and methods for research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Posthuma, R. A. (2011). Conflict management and performance outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(2), 108–110.
Puccio, G. J., & Gabra, J. F. (2012). Idea generation and idea evaluation: Cognitive skills and deliberate practices. In M. Mumford (Hrsg.), Handbook of organizational creativity (S. 189–215). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Rahim, M. A. (2010). Managing conflict in organizations (4. Aufl.). Westport: Quorum Books.
Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 53, 518–528.
Ries, B. C., Diestel, S., Wegge, J., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2010). Die Rolle von Alterssalienz und Konflikten in Teams als Mediatoren der Beziehung zwischen Altersheterogenität und Gruppeneffektivität. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie, 54, 117–130.
Rüttinger, B., & Sauer, J. (2000). Konflikt und Konfliktlösen: Kritische Situationen erkennen und bewältigen (3. Aufl.). München: Goldmann.
Scholl, W. (2004). Innovation und Information. Wie in Unternehmen neues Wissen produziert wird. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Scholl, W. (2009). Konflikte und Konflikthandhabung bei Innovationen. In E. Witte & C. Kahl (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologie der Kreativität und Innovation (S. 67–86). Lengerich: Pabst.
Scholl, W. (2011). Machtausübung oder Einflussnahme: Die zwei Gesichter der Machtnutzung. In B. Knoblach, T. Oltmanns, I. Hajnal, & D. Fink (Hrsg.), Macht in Unternehmen – Der vergessene Faktor (S. 203–221). Wiesbaden: Gabler.
Schrage, M. (2000). Serious play: How the world’s best companies simulate to innovate. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Shih, H.-A., & Susanto, E. (2011). Is innovative behavior really good for the firm? Innovative work behavior, conflict with coworkers and turnover intention: Moderating roles of perceived distributive justice. International Journal of Conflict Management, 22(2), 111–130.
Taggar, S. (2002). Individual creativity and group ability to utilize individual creative resources: A multilevel model. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 315–330.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (S. 651–717). Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.
Tjosvold, D. (1985). Implications of controversy research for management. Journal of Management, 11, 19–35.
Tjosvold, D. (2006). Defining conflict and making choices about its management. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(2), 87–95.
Tjosvold, D., & Yu, Z. Y. (2007). Group risk-taking: The constructive role of controversy in China. Group and Organization Management, 32, 653–674.
Tjosvold, D., Wong, A., Nibler, R., & Pounder, J. S. (2002). Teamwork and controversy in undergraduate management courses in Hong Kong: Can the method reinforce the message? Swiss Journal of Psychology, 61, 131–138.
Tjosvold, D., Wong, A. S. H., & Wan, P. M. K. (2010). Conflict management for justice, innovation, and strategic advantage in organizational relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(3), 636–665.
Ury, W. L., Brett, J. M., & Goldberg, S. B. (1988). Konfliktmanagement. Wirksame Strategien für den sachgerechten Interessenausgleich. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.
Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of process and product innovation. Omega, 3, 639–656.
Van de Veen, A. H., & Poole, M. S. (1995). Explaining development and change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20, 510–540.
Van de Vegt, G. S., & Janssen, O. (2010). Joint impact of interdependence and group diversity on innovation. Journal of Management, 29, 729–751.
Van de Ven, A. H., Polley, D. E., Garud, R., & Venkataraman, S. (1999). The innovation. Oxford: University Press.
Vollmer, A. (2006). Konflikt: eine Struktur- und Prozessqualität in der interorganisationalen Kooperation. Entwicklung eines arbeitspsychologischen Ansatzes und empirische Darlegung am Beispiel Virtuelle Fabrik. In A. Vollmer (Hrsg.), Kooperatives Handeln zwischen Kontinuität und Brüchen in neuen Tätigkeitssystemen (S. 110–228). Lengerich: Pabst.
Vollmer, A. (2015). Conflicts in innovation and how to approach the „last mile“ of conflict management research – a literature review. International Journal of Conflict Management, 26(2), 192–213.
Vollmer, A., & Seyr, S. (2013). Constructive controversy research in the business organizational context – A literature review. International Journal of conflict management, 24(4), 399–420.
Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wallach, M. A. (1985). Creativity testing and giftedness. In F. D. Horowitz & M. O’Brien (Hrsg.), The gifted and talented: Developmental perspectives (S. 99–123). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Wehner, T., Raeithel, A., Clases, C., & Endres, E. (1996). Von der Mühe und den Wegen der Zusammenarbeit. Ein arbeitspsychologisches Kooperationsmodell. In E. Endres & T. Wehner (Hrsg.), Zwischenbetriebliche Kooperation. Die Gestaltung von Lieferbeziehungen (S. 39–58). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
Wehner, T., Dick, M., & Clases, C. (2004). Wissen orientiert Kooperation – Transformationsprozesse im Wissensmanagement. In G. Reinmann & H. Mandl (Hrsg.), Psychologie des Wissensmanagements. Perspektiven, Theorien und Methoden (S. 161–175). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Hrsg.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (S. 309–333). Chichester: Wiley.
West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and innovation implementation in groups. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 51, 355–424.
West, M. A., & Anderson, N. (1996). Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 680–693.
West, M. A., & Farr, J. L. (1990). Innovation at work. In M. A. West & J. L. Farr (Hrsg.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (S. 309–333). Chichester: Wiley.
West, M. A., Patterson, M. G., & Dawson, J. F. (1999). A path to profit? Teamwork at the top. Centrepiece, 4, 6–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vollmer, A. (2015). Die Konstruktive Kontroverse in Innovationsprozessen – eine theoretische Zusammenführung. In: Vollmer, A., Dick, M., Wehner, T. (eds) Konstruktive Kontroverse in Organisationen. uniscope. Publikationen der SGO Stiftung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00263-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-00263-3_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-00262-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-00263-3
eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)