Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Engineering ((LNENG,volume 42))

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

Different promising developments in structural optimization have been made, with some obstacles for more widespread and general application laying mainly in some lack of generality and flexibility of computer software and the relatively high computational effort envolved. This is especially true when problems are governed by considerations in structural dynamics, which is the case for structural design of most spacecraft structures where often stress constraints are relevant only for local load introduction areas. In addition, minor changes in the requirements (i.e. in the constraint levels) often occur especially in the earlier stages of the development process and can make a “strict” optimum obsolete. But at the same time it are these earlier development stages where at least the overall structural design is frozen. So computational very efficient approaches are desirable, which must not necessarily solve for the strict optimum and also not necessarily consider each detail in stressing which is usually left for the final design stages. The benefits of such “quasi-optimization” approaches then are simplifications in the solution algorithms where then not more than one or two reanalyses are required in contrast to a considerably higher number in “strict optimization”. This is achieved for example by approximations in both the physics and optimization leading then to linear, quadratic or simplified nonlinear optimization problems. Very stringent requirements often can no longer be reasonably satisfied by a passive optimal design approach, but then active control has to be applied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. G. Vanderplaats, Efficient calculation of optimal design sensitivity, AIM Journal, Vol. 23, No. 11, Nov. 1985, pp. 1798–1803

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. B. Specht, G. Helwig, OPOS - a general computer code for optimization of struc-tures, Report MEB 68/88, Dornier System, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Schweickert, Diplomarbeit Fachgebiet Leichtbau TH Darmstadt, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Maurer, Inverse Perturbation zur effizienten Strukturoptimierung, Diplom-arbeit TH Darmstadt/Dornier System, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  5. W. Pilkey, Y.H. Chen, Indirect synthesis of multidegree systems, JOTA, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 331–346, Nov. 1976

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1989 Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Baier, H.J. (1989). Quasi-Optimization for Efficient Stiffness Design of Structures. In: Eschenauer, H.A., Thierauf, G. (eds) Discretization Methods and Structural Optimization — Procedures and Applications. Lecture Notes in Engineering, vol 42. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83707-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83707-4_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-50784-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83707-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics