Skip to main content

Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design of Structural Systems

  • Conference paper
Computer Aided Optimal Design: Structural and Mechanical Systems

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 27))

Abstract

The material derivative concept of continuum mechanics and an adjoint variable method of design sensitivity analysis are used to relate variations in structural shape to measures of structural performance. A domain method of shape design sensitivity analysis is used to best utilize the basic character of the finite element method that gives accurate information not on the boundary but in the domain. Implementation of shape design sensitivity analysis using finite element computer codes is discussed. Recent numerical results are used to demonstrate accuracy that can be obtained using the method. Result of design sensitivity analysis is used to carry out design optimization of a built-up structure.

Research supported by Nasa-Langley Grant NAG-1-215.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haftka, R.T. and Kamat, M.P., Elements of Structural Optimization, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Boston, 1985.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K. and Komkov, V., Design Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Systems, Academic Press, New York, N.Y., March, 1986.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Haftka, R.T. and Grandhi, R.V., “Structural Shape Optimization-Survey,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, to appear, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Botkin, M.E., “Shape Optimization of Plate and Shell Structures,” AIAA J., Vol. 20, No. 2, 1982, pp. 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Francavilla, A., Ramakrishnan, C.V. and Zienkiewicz, O.C., “Optimization of Shape to Minimize Stress Concentration”, J. of Strain Analysis, Vol. 10, No. 2, 1975, pp. 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braibant, V. and Fleury, C., “Shape Optimal Design Using B-Splines, ” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, Vol. 44, 1984, pp. 247–267.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dems, K. and Mroz, Z., “Variational Approach by Means of Adjoint Systems to Structural Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis — II Structural Shape Variation,” Int. J. Solids and Structures, Vol. 20, No. 6, 1984, pp. 527–552.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cea, J. “Problems of Shape Optimal Design,” Optimization of Distributed Parameter Structures, E.J. Haug and J. Cea (Eds.), Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alpen ann den Rijn, The Netherlands, 1981, pp. 1005–1048.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Choi, K.K. and Haug, E.J., “Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Elastic Structures,” J. of Struct. Mechanics, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1983, pp. 231–269.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Choi, K.K., “Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Displacement and Stress Constraints,” J. of Struct. Mechanics, Vol. 13, No. 1, 1985, pp. 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haug, E.J., Choi, K.K., Hou, J.W. and Yoo, Y.M., “A Variational Method for Shape Optimal Design of Elastic Structures,” New Directions in Optimum Structural Design, E. Atrek, R.H. Gallagher, K.M. Ragsdell and O.C. Zienkiewicz ( Eds. ), John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., 1984, pp. 105–137.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Na, M.S., Kikuchi, N. and Taylor, J.E., “Shape Optimization for Elastic Torsion Bars,” Optimization Methods in Structural Design, H. Eschenauer and N. Olhoff (Eds.), Bibliographisches Institut, Zurich, Germany, 1983, pp. 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Babuska, I. and Aziz, A.K., “Survey Lectures on the Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method,” The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations, Academic Press, 1972, pp. 1–359.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choi, K.K. and Seong, H.G., “A Domain Method for Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis of Built-Up Structures,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, to appear, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Seong, H.G. and Choi, K.K., “Boundary Layer Approach to Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis,” J. of Struct. Mechanics, to appear, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Choi, K.K. and Yao, T.M., “3-D Modeling and Automatic Regridding in Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis,” NASA Symposium: Sensitivity Analysis in Engieering, NASA-Langley Research Center, Virginia, September 25–26, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Choi, K.K. and Seong, H.G., “Design Component Method for Sensitivity Analysis of Built-Up Structures,” J. of Struct. Mechanics, to appear, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Choi, K.K., Santos, J.L.T., and Frederick, M.C., “Implementation of Design Sensitivity Analysis with Existing Finite Element Codes,” ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, 85-DET-77.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zolesio, J-P., “The Material Derivative (or Speed) Method for Shape Optimization,” Optimization of distributed Parameter Structures, E.J. Haug and J. Cea (Eds.) Sijthoff & Noordhoff, Alphen ann den Rijn, The Netherlands, 1981, pp. 1089–1151.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zolesio, J-P., “Gradient des coute Governes par des Problems de Neumann poses des Wuverts Anguleux en Optimization de Domain”, CRMA-Report 116, University of Montreal, Canada, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Choi, K.K. and Seong, H.G., “A Numerical Method for Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis and Optimization of Built-Up Structures,” The Optimum Shape: Automated Structural Design, (Eds. J.A. Bennett and M.E. Botkin ), Plenum Press, New York, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dym, C. and Shames, I.H., Solid Mechanics-A Variational Approach, McGraw-Hill, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rogers, D.F. and Adams, J.A., Mathematical Elements for Computer Graphics, McGraw-Hill, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  24. DeSalvo, G.J. and Swanson, J.A., ANSYS Engineering Analysis System, Users Manual, Swanson Analysis System, Inc., P.O. Box 65, Houston, PA, Vols. I and I I, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Przemieniecki, J.S., Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw- Hill, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lam, H.L., Choi, K.K., and Haug, E.J., “A Sparse Matrix Finite Element Technique for Iterative Structure Optimization,” Computers and Structures, Vol. 16, No. 1–4, 1983, pp. 289–295.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Choi, K.K., Haug, E.J., Hou, J.W., and Sohoni, V.N., “Pshenichny’s Linearization Method for Mechanical System Optimization,” ASME Journal of Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automation in Design, Vol. 105, No. 1, 1983, pp. 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1987 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Choi, K.K. (1987). Shape Design Sensitivity Analysis and Optimal Design of Structural Systems. In: Mota Soares, C.A. (eds) Computer Aided Optimal Design: Structural and Mechanical Systems. NATO ASI Series, vol 27. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83051-8_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-83051-8_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-83053-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-83051-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics