Abstract
The relationship between natural sciences and human thought has long been at the centre of philosophical debate and has of course been the subject of a variety of interpretations. Beginning in the middle of last century developments in scientific disciplines accelerated the dissolution of the idealist and positivist synthesis and opened the way for a (partially) new role for philosophy: the critical analysis of the results and the methodologies of science. In this century neo-Kantian discussions about the conditions determining the possibility of scientific knowledge, the neopositivist analysis of scientific theories, phenomenological attempts to achieve a closer grasp of reality, sociological emphasis on the role of shared values, and linguistic explanations have shared the stage to various degrees. In addition, far-reaching criticism of the general scientific approach to knowledge and of its technological implications has stressed the limits not only of the scientific concept of truth but also, and more radically, the possibility of the subject’s access to “rational” knowledge free of historically determined values, interests, emotions, and feelings. From this point of view man’s very nature precludes the possibility of critical enquiry based on rational criteria of extratemporal validity. Controversial postmodernist trends stress differences rather than unity and localize and relativize values and meanings. There is a widespread belief that “the positive knowledge of science may not ultimately be for the best, as the downside of scientifically produced military and industrial technics becomes quite unavoidably apparent” [1].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Christie JRR (1993) Aurora, nemesis and clio. Br. J. Hist. Sci. 26: 391–405
McCormmach R (1971) Editor’s foreward. HSPS 3; ix-xxiv
Olesko K (1980) The emergence of theoretical physics in Germany: Franz Neumann and the Konigsberg School of Physics, 1830–1890. Dissertation, Cornell University
Jungnickel C, McCormmach (1986) Intellectual mastery of nature, 2 vols. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Kuhn TS (1976) Mathematical versus experimental traditions in the development of physical science. Interdisciplinary History 7: 1–31
Schuster J (1990) The scientific revolution. In: Olby RC, Cantor GN, Christie JRR, Hodge MJS (eds) Companion to the history of modern science Routledge, London, p 217–243
Lindberg DC, Westman RS (1990) Reappraisal of the scientific revolution. Cambridge
Cunningham A, Williams P (1993) De-centring the ‘big picture’: the origins of modern science and the modern origins of science. BJHS 26: 407–432
Kuhn TS (1985) Tradizioni matematiche e tradizioni sperimentali nello sviluppo delle scienze fisiche. La tensione essenziale, cambiamenti e continuità nella scienza. Turin, pp 37–74 (see reference 5)
Heilbron J (1984) Alle origini della fisica moderna. Il caso dell’electtricità. Bologna
Bevilacqua F, Ferraresi A (1991) Per una storia dello sviluppo della matematica e della fisica a Parigi e a Pavia in eta francese. Annali di Storia Pavese 20: 199–249
Fox R (1974) The rise and fall of Laplacian physics. HSPS 4: 89–136
Grattan-Guinness: I (1990) Convolutions in French mathematics, 1800–1840, 3 vols. Birkhäuser Basel
Shinn T (1979) The French science faculty system, 1808–1914: institutional change and research potential in mathematics and the physical science. HSPS 10: 294
Fox R (1975) Regnault HV DSB 11: 352–354
Davis L (1986) The influence of astronomy and the character of physics in mid-nineteenth century France. HSPS 16: 59–82
Nye M (1983) Recent sources and problems in the history of French science. HSPS 13: 401–415
Crosland M, Smith C (1978) The transmission of physics from France to Brittain: 1800–1840. HSPS 9: 1–62
Wilson DB (1985) The educational matrix: physics at early-Victorian Cambridge, Edinburgh and Glasgow universities. In Harman PM (ed) Wranglers and physicists. Manchester University Press, Manchester, pp 12–48
Wilson DB (1982) Experimentalists among the mathematicians: physics in the Cambridge natural science tripos, 1851–1900. HSPS 12: 325–372
Grattan-Guinness I (1985) Mathematics and physics from Cambridge 1815–1840: a survey of the achievements and of the French influences. In: Harman PM (ed) Wranglers and physicists. Manchester University Press, Manchester pp 84–111
Becher HW (1980) William Whewell and Cambridge mathematics. HSPS 11: 1–48
Morrell JB (1971) Individualism and the structure of British science in 1830. HSPS 3: 183–204
Smith C, Norton Wise M (1989) Energy and empire. A biographical study of Lord Kelvin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Porter TM (1981) A statistical survey of gases: Maxwell’s social physics. HSPS 12: 77–116
Harman PM (ed) Wranglers and physicists. Studies on Cambridge mathematical physics in the nineteenth century. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Cantor G (1991) Michael Faraday. Sandemanian and scientist. MacMillan, London
Cardwell DS (1989) James Joule. A biography. Manchester University Press, Manchester
Caneva KL (1978) From galvanism to electrodynamics: the transformation of German physics and its social context. HSPS 9: 63–170
Jungnickel C (1979) Teaching and research in the physical science and mathematics in Saxony, 1820–1850. HSPS 10: 3–47
Turner RS (1971) The growth of professional research in Prussia, 1818–1848. Causes and context. HSPS 3: 137–182
Olesko KM (1991) Physics as a calling. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Heimann PM Helmholtz and Kant HSPS 5: 205–238
Heimann PM (1976) Mayer’s concept of force: the axis of a new science of physics HSPS 7: 277–296
Heimann PM (1982) Energy force and matter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bevilacqua F (1993) Helmholtz’ Ueber die Erhaltung der Kraft: the emergence of a theoretical physicist. In: Cahan D (ed) Hermann von Helmholtz and the foundations of nineteenth-century science. California University Press, Los Angeles, p 289–331
Helmholtz Hvon (1847) Ueber die Erhaltung der Kraft, reprinted in 1882 Wissenschaftliche Abhandlung Vol I, pp 12–75, p 13
Elkana Y (1974) The Discovery of the Conservation of Energy. Hutchinson Educational, London
Helmholtz Hvon (1882) Appendix to the Erhaltung Wissenschaftliche Abhandlung Vol I, pp 71–3
Helmholtz Hvon (1884) Robert Mayers’s Prioritat. In: Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Vieweg, Braunschweig
Helmholtz Hvon (1884) Appendix to Das Denken in der Medecin. In: Vorträge und Reden, 2 vols. Vieweg, Braunschweig
Planck M (1887) Das Princip der Erhaltung der Energie. Teubner, Leipzig p 21–8
Helm G (1898) Die Energetik. Veit, Leipzig
Haas AE (1909) Die Entwicklungsgeschichte des Satzes von der Erhaltung der Kraft Holder, Vienna
Lindsay R (1973) Julius Robert Mayer, prophet of energy. Pergamon, Oxford
Clausius R (1853) On the mechanical equivalent of an electric discharge, and the heating of the conducting wire which accompanies it. Tyndall and Francis Scientific Memoirs on Natural Philosophy 1: 1–32, 200–209
Clausius R (1870) De la fonction potentielle et du potentiel. Gauthier-Villars, Paris
Boltzmann L (1974) Theoretical Physics and Philosophical Problems Reidel pp 255–6
see reference 4) Vo. II, pp 154–5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bevilacqua, F. (1995). The Emergence of Theoretical Physics in the Second Half of the Nineteenth Century. In: Zwilling, R. (eds) Natural Sciences and Human Thought. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78685-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-78685-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-57518-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-78685-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive