Skip to main content

Both Wet and Moist Wound Environments Accelerate Cutaneous Healing

  • Conference paper
Wound Healing and Skin Physiology

Abstract

Since the early reports on skin wound treatment, showing that skin wounds epithelialize more rapidly under moist conditions than under dry [1, 2], a variety of water and gas permeable dressings have been developed. The principle findings of healing in a moist environment are acceleration of epithelialization and prevention of the progression of wound depth that is observed in a dry environment. In a previous study we have shown that if a skin wound is continuously kept in a liquid environment consisting of saline and cell culture concentrations of penicillin and streptomycin, eschar formation was reduced and the time of epithelialization accelerated as compared to air exposed wounds [3]. In this study we have directly compared three different conditions under which porcine partial excisional wounds can heal: Wet (saline in an occlusive vinyl chamber), moist (hydrocolloid) and dry (air exposure under gauze dressing).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Winter GD (1962) Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelialization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature 193(4812):293–294.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Winter G, Scales JT (1963) Effect of air dressing and dressings on the surface of a wound. Nature 197(4862):91–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Breuing K, Eriksson E, Liu PY, Miller DR (1992) Healing of partial thickness porcine skin wounds in a liquid environment. J Surg Res 52:50–58.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dyson M, Young S, Pendle CL, Webster DF, Lang SM (1988) Comparison of the effects of moist and dry conditions on dermal repair. J Invest Dermatol 91:434–438.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mertz PM, Marshall DA, Eaglstein WH (1985) Occlusive dressings to prevent bacterial invasion and wound infection. J Am Acad Dermat 12(4):662–668.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alvarez OM, Merzt PM, Eaglstein WH (1983) The effect of occlusive dressings on collagen synthesis and re-epithelialization in superficial wounds. J Surg Res 35:142–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jonkman MF (1989) Epidermal wound healing between moist and dry. Thesis, Rijksuni-versiteit, Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonkman MF, Hoeksma EA, Nieuwenhuis P (1990) Accelerated epithelialization under a highly vapor-permeable wound dressing is associated with increased precipitation of fibrin (ogen) and fibronectin. J Invest Dermatol 94:477–484.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jonkman MF, Bruin P, Hoeksma EA, Nieuwenhuis P, Klasen HJ, Pennings A, Molenaar I (1988) A colt-inducing wound covering with high vapour permeability: enhancing effects on epidermal wound healing in partial-thickness wounds in Guinea pigs. Surgery 104:537–545.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Eaglstein WH, Davis SC, Mehle AL, Mertz PM (1988) Optimal use of an occlusive dressing to enhance healing. Arch Dermatol 124:392–395.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedman SJ, Daniel Su WP (1984) Management of leg ulcers with hydrocolloid dressing. Arch Dermatol 120:1329–1336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Breuing K, Marikovsky M, Klagsbrun M, Liu YP, Binder T, Miller DR, Eriksson E (1991) EGF-like growth factor present in porcine wound fluid. Surg Forum XLII:623–625.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brem H, Yuen S, Watanabe H, Tamvakopoulis G, Marikovski M, Vogt PM, Klagsbrun M, Reiksson E, Grosfeld J, Folkman J (1992). Time dependent expression of bFGF during wound healing. Surg Forum (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eriksson E, Liu PY, Zeckel Y, Binder T, Breuing K, Miller DR (1991) In vivo cell culture accelerates reepithelialization. Surg Forum XLI:670–673.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vogt PM, Thompson S, Binder T, Mulligan R, Eriksson E (1992) In-vitro/in-vivo expression of human growth hormone in porcine keratinocytes after retroviral gene transfer. Surg Forum XLIII:691–694.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Vogt, P.M., Breuing, K., Liu, P.Y., Binder, T., Eriksson, E. (1995). Both Wet and Moist Wound Environments Accelerate Cutaneous Healing. In: Altmeyer, P., Hoffmann, K., el Gammal, S., Hutchinson, J. (eds) Wound Healing and Skin Physiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77882-7_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77882-7_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-56124-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-77882-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics