Skip to main content

Supporting Decision Processes: An Approach and Two Examples

  • Conference paper
Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid

Abstract

In this paper problems of support of discrete decision processes are discussed. A rule-based formalism is used to represent the decision problem, to model interactions with the environment, and to modify problem representation. A three-valued valuation function is used to give the flexibility in selection of a particular solution. The modelling approach and the solutions are illustrated with simple yet compelling example. An expert system shell NEGOPLAN is discussed and examples of its use to support negotiations with a hostage-taker are given. The negotiator is a police commander who should have an ability to modify a problem representation as a hostage-taking incident evolves. The possibility of implementing the proposed approach to decision problems in a dynamic environment is also discussed.

The authors would like to thank Mike Connolly of the Canadian Police College and Peter Mcnaughton of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police for help in learning about negotiation with terrorists. The participation of Zbig Koperczak of University of Ottawa, Department of Computer Science in the development of the knowledge base described in this paper is also acknowledged. This work has been partially supported by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, T.E. (1986) “Time-Phase Model for Hostage Negotiation”, The Police Chief. No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, S.E. and T. Sandler (1987) “Terrorism in a Bargaining Framework”, Journal of Law and Economics. Vol. XXX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charniak, E. and D. McDermott (1985) Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, A. (1982) Game Theory and Experimental Games. The Study of Strategic Interaction. New York: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderton, H.B. (197 2) A Mathematical Introduction to Logic. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N.M. and K.W. Hipel (1984) Conflict Analysis. Models and Resolutions. New York: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, K.R. (1988) “Judgement and Decision Making in Dynamic Tasks”, Information and Decision Technologies. Vol 14, No. l 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R.C., and J. R. Hautzinger (1979) “Hostage Negotiation — The Ultimate Game”, R.C.M.P. Gazette. Vol. 41, No. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C. (1977) Rational Behavior and Bargaining Equilibrium in Games and Social Situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hogger, C.J. ( 1984 ) Introduction to Logic Programming. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J.H., K.J. Holoyoak, R.E. Nisbett and P.R. Thagard (1987) Induction: Process of Inference, Learning and Discovery. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. (1986) Introduction to Expert Systems. Wokingham: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. (1989) “Expert System Technology and Strategic Decision Support”, Mathematical Modelling, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E., W. Michalowski, S. Matwin and S. Szpakowicz (1988) “Representing the Negotiation Process with a Rule-based Formalism”, Theory and Decision. Vol. 25, 225–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and W. Michalowski (1988) “A Cooperative Expert System for Negotiation with a Hostage-taker”, School of Business, Carleton University, WP 88–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersten, G.E. and S. Szpakowicz (1988) “Rule-based Formalism and Preference Representation: An Extension of NEGOPLAN”, Department of Computer Science, University of Ottawa, WP 88–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksymchuk, A.F. (1982) “Strategies for Hostage-Taking Incidents”, The Police Chief. No. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matwin, S., S. Szpakowicz, Z. Koperczak, G.E. Kersten and W. Michalowski (1989) “NEGOPLAN: An Expert System Shell for Negotiation Support”, IEEE Expert, (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matwin, S., S. Szpakowicz, G.E. Kersten and W. Michalowski (1987) “Logic-based System for Negotiation Support”, Proceedings of the 1987 Symposium on Logic Programming. San Francisco, IEEE Computer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, W., G.E. Kersten, Z. Koperczak, S. Matwin and S. Szpakowicz (1988) “Negotiation with a Terrorist: Can an Expert System Help?”, in M.G. Singh et al. (eds), Managerial Decision Support Systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. et al. (1976) “The Structure of “Unstructured” Decision Processes”, Administrative Science Quaterly. Vol. 21, 246–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirabella, R.W. and J. Trudeau (1981) “Managing Hostage Negotiations”, The Police Chief. No. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellenberg, J.A. (1982) The Science of Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakun, M.F. (1988) Evolutionary Systems Design: Policy Making Under Complexity and Group Decision Support Systems. Oakland: Holden-Day.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, R. L. (1984) “Hostage Negotiations and the Stockholm Syndrome”, Military Police Journal. Vol. 11, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sycara, E.P. (1987) “Resolving Adversarial Conflict: An Approach Integrating Case-based Reasoning and Analytic Methods”. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Information and Computer Science, Georgia Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder, R. G. and R.O. Mason (1987) “An Expert System Application for Decision Support in Law Enforcement”, Decision Sciences. Vol. 18, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R.E. and R.B. McKersie (1965) A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winston, P.H. (1986) Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O.R. (1975) Bargaining: Formal Theories of Negotiations. Urbane: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, P.L. (1985) Multiple-Criteria Decision Making. Concepts, Techniques, and Extensions. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kersten, G.E., Michalowski, W. (1990). Supporting Decision Processes: An Approach and Two Examples. In: Bana e Costa, C.A. (eds) Readings in Multiple Criteria Decision Aid. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75935-2_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75937-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75935-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics