Skip to main content

Obtaining Reliable Information from Randomized Controlled Trials in Congestive Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Dysfunction

  • Conference paper
Heart Failure and Arrhythmias

Abstract

Chronic congestive heart failure (CHF) is a syndrome that is the end result of a number of different kinds of cardiac damage and compensatory mechanisms resulting in a variable prognosis. Patients usually have a high mortality rate, a high rate of morbid complications, and multiple severe symptoms. The high rates of morbidity and symptoms lead to limitations in daily activities and poor quality of life. The aim of therapy in such patients should therefore be not only the amelioration of symptoms and signs of CHF but also the prevention of morbidity, improvement in quality of life, and prolongation of survival. Because the clinical course in a particular patient is highly variable and unpredictable, the effect of a therapy can be reliably evaluated only if all sources of errors in this evaluation are minimized. In general, errors can be classified into those due to systematic biases and those due to random errors. In order to avoid a variety of systematic biases randomized double-blind controlled trials are essential. Such studies avoid biases in patient allocation, minimize imbalances at entry use of other therapy, and avoid biases in endpoint ascertainment. In this chapter, I will discuss the following issues:

  1. 1.

    The likely size of effect with currently available interventions.

  2. 2.

    Why randomized trials are essential in heart failure.

  3. 3.

    Why some of the trials should be much larger than those that have been conducted.

  4. 4.

    How some of the currently employed methods of analysis and reporting can be biased and can lead to misleading conclusions.

  5. 5.

    Why one may not be able to extrapolate from the effect of a particular agent on surrogate endpoints (such as exercise tolerance) to clinically relevant outcomes such as survival or morbidity.

  6. 6.

    How the framework of the trials and the data that are collected systematically provide an opportunity to learn more about the clinical course of patients with heart failure.

  7. 7.

    Examples of some large studies that are in progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Furberg CD, Yusuf S (1988) Effect of drug therapy on survival in chronic congestive heart failure. Am J Cardiol 62: 42A–45A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yusuf S, Collins R, Peto R (1984) Why do we need some large, simple randomized trials? Stat Med 3: 409–420

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Yusuf S, Held P, Teo KK, Toretsky ER (1990) Selection of patients for randomized controlled trials: implications of wide or narrow eligibility criteria. Stat Med 9: 73–86

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. CONSENSUS Trial Study Group (1987) Effects of enalapril on mortality in severe congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 316: 1429–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn JN, Archibald DG, Ziesche S et al. (1986) Effect of vasodilator therapy on mortality in chronic congestive heart failure: results of a Veterans Administration Cooperative Study. N Engl J Med 314: 1547–1552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Protocol for VA Cooperative Study no 153. Vasodilator used in chronic congestive heart failure. February 1982: 1–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. DiBianco R, Shabetai R, Kostuk W, Moran J, Schlant RC, Wright R for the Milrinone Multicenter Trial (1989) A comparison of oral milrinone, digoxin and their combination in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 320: 677–683

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. MacMahon S, Collins R, Peto R, Koster RW, Yusuf S (1988) Effects of prophylactic lidocaine in suspected acute myocardial infarction. An overview of results from the randomized controlled trials. JAMA 260: 1910–1916

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cardiac Arrhythmia Pilot Study (CAPS) Investigators (1988) Effects of encainide, fle- cainide, imipramine and moricizine on ventricular arrhythmias during the year after acute myocardial infarction: the CAPS. Am J Cardiol 61: 501–509

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial (CAST) Investigators (1989) Preliminary report: effect of encainide and flecainide on mortality in a randomized trial of arrhythmia suppression after myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 321: 406–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yusuf, S. (1990). Obtaining Reliable Information from Randomized Controlled Trials in Congestive Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Dysfunction. In: Brachmann, J., Dietz, R., Kübler, W. (eds) Heart Failure and Arrhythmias. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75326-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-75326-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-75328-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-75326-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics