Skip to main content

Abstract

Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii, Hook.), named in honour of Traug Gerber, is commonly known as Transvaal Daisy, or Barberton Daisy. It is a dwarf perennial herbaceous plant growing in clumps with solitary flower heads on long slender stems which grow well above the foliage. The flowers come in a wide range of colours including yellow, white, orange, pink, crimson and purple. Gerberas are good for beds, borders, rock gardens, pot culture and cut flowers. The flowers suit very well in different floral arrangements. Gerberas can be successfully grown both on plains and in the hills. In western countries they are usually grown in greenhouses, but in mild weather are even grown outdoors on the south-west side. Cultivars of commercial importance are Maroon, the Clementine series, Xenia, Flamengo, Delphi, Apple Blossom and Uranus [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Byrne TG (1973) Gerbera selection and postharvest handling. Flower Nurs Rep Nov 10

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leffring L (1973) Flower Production in Gerbera-I. Correlation between shoot, leaf and flower formation in seedling. Sci Hortic 1 (3): 221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Plate HP, Krober H (1975) Damage to young gerbera plants caused by Pythium sp. and Rhizoctonia solani. Gartenwelt 75 (15): 340

    Google Scholar 

  4. Leffring L (1973) The influence of leaves and shoots on flower production in Gerbara. Vakbl Bloemisterij 28 (15): 11

    Google Scholar 

  5. Meeteren van U (1978) Water relations and keeping quality of cut Gerbera flowers II. Water balance of ageing flowers. Sci Hortic (Amst) 9: 189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Meeteren van U (1979 a) Water relation and keeping quality of cut Gerbera flowers. Ill water content, permeability and dry weight of ageing petals. Sci Hortic (Amst) 10:261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Meeteren van U (1979 b) Water relations and keeping quality of ageing cut Gerbera. IV Internal water relations of ageing petal tissues. Sci Hortic (Amst) 11: 83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Meeteren U van, Gelder H van (1980 a) Water relations and keeping quality of cut Gerbera flowers V. Role of endogenous eytokinins. Sci Hortic (Amst) 12: 273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meeteren U van (1980 b) Water relations and keeping quality of cut Gerbera flowers. VI. Role of Pressure potential. Sci Hortic (Amst) 12: 283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Meeteren U van (1980 c) Role of pressure potential in keeping quality of cut Gerbera inflorescences. Acta Hortic 113:143

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saccalis JN (1975) Sucrose: patterns of uptake and some effects on cut flower senescence. Acta Hortic 41: 45

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gradner U (1975) A palette for transporting gerberas developed at Veitschochheim. Dtsch Gartenbau 29 (42): 1943

    Google Scholar 

  13. Staby GL, Robertson JL, Kiplinger DC, Conover CA (1978) Chain of life, Ohio Flor Assoc Columbus, Ohio (USA )

    Google Scholar 

  14. Systema W (1981) The keeping quality of gerbera varieties is difficult to assess. Vakbl Bloemisterij 36 (4): 50

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veen H (1983) Silver thiosulfate an experimental tool in plant science, Sic Hortic 20 (3): 211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Akamine EK (1976) Postharvest handling of tropical ornamental crops. HortScience 11 (2): 125

    Google Scholar 

  17. Akamine EK, Goo T (1975) Vase life extension of anthurium flowers with commercial floral preservatives, chemical compounds and other materials. Flor Rev 155 (4027): 14

    Google Scholar 

  18. Akamine EK, Goo T (1981) Controlled atmosphere storage of anthurium flowers. HortScience 16 (2): 206

    Google Scholar 

  19. Higaki T, Rasmussen HP, Carpenter WJ (1980) Calcium deficiency of Anthurium andreanum Lind. Spathe. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105 (3): 438

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Higaki T, Rasmussen HP, Carpenter WJ (1980) Color breakdown in Anthurium andeanum Lind. spathe caused by calcium deficiency. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105 (3): 441

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Iwata RY, Tung CS, Kamimoto H (1979) Anthocyanin of Anthurium andreanum. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104 (4): 464

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kamemoto H (1962) Some factors affecting the keeping quality of anthurium flowers. Hawaii Farm Sci 11: 2–4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nijlunsing W (1976) Transport trial with anthurium packaging. Vakbl Bloemisterij 31 (42): 23

    Google Scholar 

  24. Paull RE, Goo T (1982) Pulses treatment with silver nitrage extends the vase life of anthurium. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 107 (5): 842

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schenk M, Brundert W (1981) Temperature effects on Anthurium andreanum hybrids. Dtsch Gartenbau 36 (49): 2064

    Google Scholar 

  26. Segers CM (1976) Pack anthurium flowers more carefully. Vakbe Bloemisterij 31 (45): 45

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shirankawa T, Dedolph RR, Watson DP (1964) N6-Benzyl adenine effects on chilling injury, respiration and keeping quality of Anthurium andreanum. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 85: 642

    Google Scholar 

  28. Systema W, Barendse L (1975) Keeping quality of cut flowers VI. Anthurium andreanuma cut flower that lasts well. Vakbl Bloemisterij 30 (51): 1921

    Google Scholar 

  29. Walker PN, Smith MR (1978) Machine logic for harvesting of anthurium harvester. Transaction of ASAE 21 (6): 1040

    Google Scholar 

  30. Higaki T, Watson DP, Leonhardt KW (1979) Anthurium culture in Hawaii. Univ Hawaii Manos Circular 420

    Google Scholar 

  31. Auman CW (1980) Minor cut flower crops. In: Larson RA (ed) Introduction to Floriculture. Academic Press London 185–211

    Google Scholar 

  32. Farnham DS, Kofranek AM, Kabota J (1978) Bud opening in Gypsophila paniculata cv. Perfecta with Physan 20. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 103 (3): 382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. De Hertough AA (1980) Bulbous crops. In: Larson RA (ed) Introduction to Floriculture. Academic Press, London 215

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fortanier EJ, Zevinbergen (1979) Analysis of the effects of temperature and light after planting on bud blasting in Iris hollandica. Neth J Agr Sci 21: 145

    Google Scholar 

  35. Laurie A, Kiplinger DC, Nelson KS (1968) Commercial Flower Forcing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  36. Hardenberg RE, Uota M, Parson CS (1969) Refrigeration and modified storage for improved keeping quality of cut flowers. Proc 12th Int Congr Refrig 3: 339

    Google Scholar 

  37. Rogers MN (1980) Snapdragons. In: Larson RA (ed) Interoduetion to Floriculture. Academic Press, London 107

    Google Scholar 

  38. Sanderson KC (1975) Harvesting, grading and quality, packing and shipping. Flor Rev 156 (4040): 81

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tees HJ, Sheehan TJ (1957) Chemical modification of geotropic bending in snapdragon. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 70: 391

    Google Scholar 

  40. Laurie A, Poesch GH (1932) Photoperiodism the value of supplementary illumination and reduction of light on flowering plants in the greenhouse. Ohio Agric Expt Stn Res Bull 512: 8, 31, 35

    Google Scholar 

  41. Roberts RH, Struckmyer BE (1939) Further studies on the effects of temperature and other environmental factors upon the photoperiodic response of plants. J Agril Res 59: 669

    Google Scholar 

  42. Haney WJ (1953) Day length manipulation to time snapdragons. Nat Snapdragon Soc Bull 2: 1

    Google Scholar 

  43. Maginnes EA, Langhans RW (1967) Photoperiod and flowering of snapdragons. N Y State Flower Grow Bull 261: 1

    Google Scholar 

  44. Maginnes EA, Langhans RW (1976) Flashing light affects the flowering of snapdragons. N Y State Flower Grow Bull 261: 1

    Google Scholar 

  45. Flint H (1960) Relative effects of light duration and intensity on growth and flowering of winter snapdragon (Antirrhinum majus L.) Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 75: 769

    Google Scholar 

  46. Flint H, Anderson RC (1959) Effects of supplementary illumination on the growth and time of flowering of snapdragon. (Antirrhinum majus L.). Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 73: 479

    Google Scholar 

  47. Miller RO (1958) 50° for snapdragons. N Y State Flower Grow Bull 145:1

    Google Scholar 

  48. Miller RO (1959) What temperature for greenhouse snapdragons. Natl snapdragon Soc Bull 10: 3

    Google Scholar 

  49. Miller PO (1960) Growth and flowering of snapdragons as affected by night temperatures adjusted in relation to light intensity. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 75: 761

    Google Scholar 

  50. Miller PO (1962) Variations in optimum temperatures of snapdragons, depending on plant size. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 81: 535

    Google Scholar 

  51. Tayama HK, Miller RO (1965) Relationship of plant age and net assimilation rate to optimum growing temperature of the snapdragon. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 86: 672

    Google Scholar 

  52. Fischer CW Jr (1950) Production of a toxic volatile by flowering stems of common snapdragons and calceolaria. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 55: 447

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Williamson CE (1963) Plant disease affects keeping quality. In: Rogers MN (ed) The living flowers that last. Univ Mo Columbia, 19

    Google Scholar 

  54. Laurie A, Wagner A (1940) Deficiency symptoms of greenhouse flower crops. Ohio Agric Expt Stn Res Bull 611: 19

    Google Scholar 

  55. Oertli JJ (1970a) Nutrient disorders in snapdragons. Flor Rev 146 (3773): 20

    Google Scholar 

  56. Oertli JJ (1970b) Phosphorus deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3774): 28

    Google Scholar 

  57. Oertli JJ (1970c) Potassium deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3775): 29

    Google Scholar 

  58. Oertli JJ (1970d) Calcium deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3776): 51

    Google Scholar 

  59. Oertli JJ (1970e) Magnesium deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3777): 23

    Google Scholar 

  60. Oertli JJ (1970f) Sulfur deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3778): 28

    Google Scholar 

  61. Oertli JJ (1970g) Born deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3779): 65

    Google Scholar 

  62. Oertli JJ (1970h) Iron deficiency. Flor Rev 146 (3780): 24

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mastalerz JW (1957) Boron deficiency in snapdragons. Pen State Flower Grow Bull 75: 3

    Google Scholar 

  64. Staby GL, Robertson JL, Kiplinger DC, Conover CA (1978) Chain of life. Ohio Flor Assoc Columbus (USA )

    Google Scholar 

  65. Adams DG, Urdahl WA (1972) Snapdragon stem tip breakage as related to stem lignification and flower color. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 97: 474

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mastalerz JW (1953) Low temperature conditioning of snaps. Natl Snapdragon Soc Bull 3: 1

    Google Scholar 

  67. Bonnet JL, Smith Jr JE (1955) A geotropic response of snapdragons to treatment with trichloro phenoxypropionic acid. Natl Snapdragon Soc Bull 4: 2

    Google Scholar 

  68. Joiner JN, Sheehan TJ, Mitchell KF (1974) Control of a geotropic response in snapdragon flower spikes. Proc Fla Sta Hortic Soc 86: 374

    Google Scholar 

  69. Burg SP (1973) Hypobaric storage of cut flowers. HortScience 8: 202

    Google Scholar 

  70. Larson RA, Scholes JF (1966) Effects of 8-hydroxyquinoline citrate, N-diamethyl amino succinamic acid and sucrose on vase life and spike characteristics of cut snapdragons. Proc Am Soc Hortic Sci 89: 694

    Google Scholar 

  71. Raulston JC, Marousky FJ (1970) Enhancement of snapdragon floret color with light and floral preservatives. HortScience 5: 355

    Google Scholar 

  72. Raulstorn JL, Marousky FJ (1971) Effects of 8–10 days of 5 °C storage and floral preservatives on snapdragon cut flowers. Fla Flower Grow 8 (2): 4

    Google Scholar 

  73. Johnson CR (1972) Effectiveness of floral preservatives in increasing the vase life of snapdragons. Flor Rev 149(3868): 47, 95

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wang CY, Baker JE, Hardenburg RE, Lieberman M (1977) Effects of two analogs of rhizobitoxine and sodium benzoate on senescence of snapdragons. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 102: 517

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Glass J J (1979) A study on Freesia returns. Vakbl Bloemisterij 34 (3): 42

    Google Scholar 

  76. Mastarlerz JW (1977) Greenhouse Environment. Wiley USA, 320

    Google Scholar 

  77. Barendse LVJ (1979) What measures will improve the keeping quality of Freesia Vakbl Bloemisterij 34 (lb): 28

    Google Scholar 

  78. Penning BV, Intransil BV (1978) A bunching machine for Freesia. Vakbl Bloemestery 33 (10): 14

    Google Scholar 

  79. Barendse LVJ (1978) The keeping quality of asparagus fern can be good. Vakbl Bloestermisterij 33 (48): 25

    Google Scholar 

  80. Carow B (1978) Keeping quality of sword ferns: different reactions to cut flower preservatives, problem with mixed bouquet. Gurtnerbose and Gurtenwelf 78: 1217–1218

    Google Scholar 

  81. Bailey LH (1976) Hortus Third. McMillan New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1990 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Salunkhe, D.K., Bhat, N.R., Desai, B.B. (1990). Other Cut Flowers. In: Postharvest Biotechnology of Flowers and Ornamental Plants. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73803-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73803-6_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73805-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73803-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics