Skip to main content

Discrimination Strategies in Animal Psychophysics and Their Role in Understanding Sensory Receptor Function

  • Chapter
Transduction Mechanisms of Drug Stimuli

Part of the book series: Psychopharmacology Series ((PSYCHOPHARM,volume 4))

Abstract

Discrimination is defined in a restricted sense here as a precise and specifiable relation between stimuli and responses. Experimenter control of stimulation is one significant feature of this relation. It is suggested that there may be some important differences between discrimination of drugs and exteroceptive stimulation. However, a discussion of current strategies in animal psychophysics might uncover similarities between these two discrimination formats useful in formulating questions and designing future research. Traditionally animal psychophysics has focused on basic questions of acuity and sensitivity (threshold). Beyond their obvious value in the study of comparative sensory function and evolutionary development, these experiments have provided particularly important new insights into the understanding of peripheral sensory transduction and processing and their relation to perception. Our experiments have been carried out in animals whose hearing has been impaired by drugs and cryolesions, and relations have been sought between the subsequent hearing loss and the histopathological changes occurring in the auditory receptor cells of the inner ear. But threshold sensitivity is only one of many perceptual dimensions and tells us nothing of the discriminations that are made among stimuli which are clearly above minimum detectable levels. For example, discriminations occur along stimulus dimensions such as wavelength of light, sound pressure, acoustic frequency, and so on. Sensory systems also permit the accurate location of the source of stimulation at a distance, the selection of certain frequencies or wavelengths and the rejection of others, and finally the discrimination among very complex but biologically useful signals such as speech. Prototypical experiments are described; the results suggest significant and orderly relations with peripheral sensory processing mechanisms. The power of operant behavior to examine perception from a variety of perspectives is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Blough DS (1966) The study of animal sensory processes by operant methods. In: Honig WK (ed) Operant behavior: areas of research and application. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, pp 345–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JN, Nuttall AL (1987) Cryoprobe-induced apical lesions in the chinchilla. I. Effects of lesioning parameters. Hearing Res 26:301–309

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins JE Jr (1976) Drug ototoxicity. In: Keidel WD, Neff WD (eds) Handbook of sensory physiology, vol V, part 3. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 707–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins JE Jr, Stebbins WC, Johnsson L-G, Moody DB, Muraski A (1977) The patas monkey as a model for dihydrostreptomycin ototoxicity. Acta Otolaryngol 83:123–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1938) The behavior of organisms. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DW (1986) Effects of selective outer hair cell lesions on the frequency selectivity of the patas monkey auditory system. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DW, Moody DB, Stebbins WC, Shaddock LC (1986) The effects of selective outer hair cell loss on psychophysical tuning curves in the patas monkey. Abstracts of the 9th midwinter meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology. Clearwater Beach, February 2–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith DW, Brown JN, Moody DB, Stebbins WC, Nuttall AL (1987a) Cryoprobe-induced apical lesions in the chinchilla: II. Effects on behavioral auditory thresholds. Hearing Res 26:311–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DW, Moody DB, Stebbins WC, Norat MA (1987b) Effects of selective outer hair cell loss on the frequency selectivity of the patas monkey auditory system. Hearing Res 29:125–138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC (1978) Hearing of the primates. In: Chivers DJ, Herbert J (eds) Recent advances in primatology, vol I. Behaviour. Academic, New York, pp 703–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC (1982) Concerning the need for more sophisticated animal models in sensory behavioral toxicology. Environ Health Perspect 44:77–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Coombs S (1975) Behavioral assessment of ototoxicity in nonhuman primates. In: Weiss B, Laties VG (eds) Behavioral toxicology. Plenum, New York, pp 401–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Moody DB (1979) Comparative behavioral toxicology. Neurobehav Toxicol 1:33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Miller JM, Johnsson L-G, Hawkins JE Jr (1969) Ototoxic hearing loss and cochlear pathology in the monkey. Trans Am Otol Soc 57:110–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Hawkins JE Jr, Johnsson L-G, Moody DB (1979) Hearing thresholds with outer and inner hair cell loss. Am J Otolaryngol 1:15–27

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Brown CH, Petersen MR (1984) Sensory processes in animals. In: Darian-Smith I, Brookhart J, Mountcastle VB (eds) Handbook of physiology, sensory processes, vol I. American Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins WC, Moody DB, Hawkins JE Jr, Johnsson L-G, Norat MA (1987) The species-specific nature of the ototoxicity of dihydrostreptomycin in the patas monkey. Neurotoxicology 8(l):33–44

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yerkes RM, Watson JB (1911) Methods of studying vision in animals. Behav Monogr 2 [2, iv]:90

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stebbins, W.C., Smith, D.W., Moody, D.B. (1988). Discrimination Strategies in Animal Psychophysics and Their Role in Understanding Sensory Receptor Function. In: Colpaert, F.C., Balster, R.L. (eds) Transduction Mechanisms of Drug Stimuli. Psychopharmacology Series, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73223-2_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-73223-2_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-73225-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-73223-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics