Abstract
In his paper Boerger raises the question whether temporal coding of “repetition noise” in T.D.U.-units is relevant for the perception of Repetition Pitch (RP). To elaborate this question basic to our understanding of pitch mechanisms, let us summarize the main facts on pitch from psychophysical experiments and compare these with data from electrophysiology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bilsen, F.A. and Ritsma, R.J. (1969/70), Repetition Pitch and its implication for hearing theory. Acustica 22, 63–73.
Bilsen, F.A. and Goldstein, J.L. (1974), Pitch of dichotically delayed noise and its possible spectral basis. J. Acoust.Soc.Am. 55, 292–296.
Houtsma, A.J.M., and Goldstein, J.L. (1972). The central origin of the pitch of complex tones: evidence from musical interval recognition. J. Acoust. Soc.Am. 51, 520–529.
Kate, J.H. ten, Bilsen, F.A., Raatgever, J. and Buunen, T.J.F. (1974), Single unit responses in acoustic nuclei of cat to noise and its attenuated repetition. Accepted for 8th I.C.A., London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1974 Spinger-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bilsen, F.A. (1974). Comments on: “Coding of repetition noise in the cochlear nucleus in cat” (G. Boerger). In: Zwicker, E., Terhardt, E. (eds) Facts and Models in Hearing. Communication and Cybernetics, vol 8. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65902-7_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-65902-7_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-65904-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-65902-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive