Abstract
There does not exist a weak ∞-Chichilnisky rule as defined in Candeal et al. (1992).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Candeal JC, Induráin E, Uriarte JR (1992) Some issues related to the topological aggregation of preferences. Soc Choice Welfare 9: 213–227
Chichilnisky G, Heal GM (1979) Social Choice with Infinite Population: Construction of a Rule and Impossibility Results. Working Paper, Columbia University and the University of Essex
Efimov B, Koshevoy G (1992) The Topological Approach to Social Choice with Infinite Populations. Working Paper, Russian Academy of Sciences, Central Economics Mathematical Institute
Lauwers L (1992) Continuity in Spaces of Infinite Dimension. Unpublished Note
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lauwers, L. (1997). A note on weak ∞-Chichilnisky rules. In: Heal, G.M. (eds) Topological Social Choice. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60891-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60891-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64599-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60891-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive