Skip to main content

Effects and Side Effects of Abdominal Drainage

  • Conference paper
Peritoneal Adhesions

Abstract

After about 30 experiments in animals Yates [7] concluded that most of the serous exudate of an abdominal drain is caused by its own foreign-body reaction, that there is draining inward as well as outward, and that abdominal drains usually will seal off within 24 h. In 1905 he wrote: “There is probably no detail in modern surgical pathology that deserves more thorough comprehension, but which is less definitely understood by the average teacher, practitioner, and student than the nature of the reaction of the peritoneum to drainage”. Meanwhile modern and well-tolerated materials should reduce the foreign-body effect and allow better drainage function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrama HM, Blackwood JM, Brown CS, Machiedo GW, Rush BF (1976) Functional longevity of intraperitoneal drains. Am J Surg 132: 416–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berliner SD, Burson LC, Lear PE (1964) Use and abuse of intraperitoneal drains in colon surgery. Arch Surg 89: 686–690

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hagmüller E, Lorenz D, Werthmann K, Trede M (1990) Nutzen und Risiken einer Drainage nach elektiven Colonresektionen. Chirurg 61: 266–271

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manz W, La Tendresse C, Sako Y (1970) The detrimental effects of drains on colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum 13: 17–25

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schäfer K, Wedmann B, Finke U, Börsch G, Brand J (1988) Efficiency of drainage after cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 5: 18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiemer C, Ernst R, Wedmann B, Zumtobel V (1991) Die problemlose Cholezystektomie mit oder ohne Wunddrainage. In: Zumtobel V, Schäfer K (eds) Wunddrainage in der Elektiv-und Notfallchirurgie. Pabst, Lengerich, pp 41–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yates JL (1905) An experimental study of the local effects of peritoneal drainage. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1: 473–492

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zumtobel, V., Ernst, R., Senkal, M. (1997). Effects and Side Effects of Abdominal Drainage. In: Treutner, KH., Schumpelick, V. (eds) Peritoneal Adhesions. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60433-1_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-60433-1_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-61192-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-60433-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics