Skip to main content

The Effect of Telephone Survey Design on Discriminant Analysis

  • Conference paper
Advances in Classification and Data Analysis

Abstract

In this paper the effect of telephone survey sample design on discriminant analysis is studied. The population is divided into two groups and a superpopulation model with multivariate normal distribution is assumed for the variables. The learning sample is composed of the randomly generated telephone numbers which correspond to the eligible population units (RDD). The rate of misclassification of the discriminant function and the effect of sample design on this rate of misclassification are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Albaum G., Baker K. (1976), The sampling problem in validation of multiple discriminant analysis, Journal of the Market Research Society, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crask M. R., Perreault W. D. Jr. (1977), Validation of discriminant analysis in marketing research, Journal of marketing research, n. 14, pp. 60 – 68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair J. F. Jr., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C. (1992), Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 3rd ed., Macmillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane F. R. S. (1945), On a method of estimating frequencies, Biometrika, 33, pp. 222 – 225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N. L., Kotz S. and Balakrishnan N. (1997), Discrete Multivariate Distributions, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leu, C. H. and Tsui, K. W. (1997). Discriminant analysis of survey data, Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 60, 273 – 290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepkowsky, J. M. (1988). Telephone sampling methods in the United States, in Groves R. M. et al. (eds), Telephone Survey Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 161 – 173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Särndal C. E., Swensson B, Wretman J. (1992), Model Assisted Survey Sampling, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, C. J., Holt D., Smith T. M. F. (eds) (1989) An Analysis of Complex Surveys. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waksberg J. (1978), Sampling Methods for Random Digit Dialling, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, pp. 40 – 46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Petrucci, A., Pratesi, M. (2001). The Effect of Telephone Survey Design on Discriminant Analysis. In: Borra, S., Rocci, R., Vichi, M., Schader, M. (eds) Advances in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59471-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59471-7_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-41488-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59471-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics