Skip to main content

An MLE strategy for combining optimally pruned decision trees

  • Conference paper
COMPSTAT

Abstract

This paper provides a maximum likelihood estimation strategy to identify a tree-based model which, being a function of a set of observed optimally pruned trees, represents the final classification model. The strategy is based on a probability distribution and it uses a metric based on structural differences among trees. An example on a real dataset is also presented to show how the procedure works.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banks, D. and Costantine, G. (1998). Metric models for random graphs, Journal of Classification, 15, pp. 199–223.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Breiman L., Friedman J. H., Olshen R. A. and Stone C. J. (1984). Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont CA.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, C. and Siciliano, R. (1998). Strategies for choosing the best decision trees. In: Analyses Multidimensionelle des Donnees,IV Congres International NGUS’97, pp. 101–111, Fernandez, K. and Morineau, A. eds, CISIA Ceresta, St. Mande, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, C., Mola, F. and Siciliano, R. (1998). An alternative pruning method based on the impurity-complexity measure. In: Proceedings in Computational Statistics, pp. 221–226, Payne, R. and Green, P. eds, Heidelberg: Physica-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, D., Esposito, F. and Semeraro, G. (1995). A further comparison of simplification methods for decision tree pruning. In: Learning from Data: Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Fisher, D. and Lanz, H. eds, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangasarian, O.L. et al. (1995). Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis via linear programming. Operations Research, 43 (4), pp. 570–577.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1989), An empirical comparison of pruning methods for decision tree induction. Machine Learning, 4, pp. 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niblett, T., Bratko, I. (1986), Learning decision rules in noisy domains. In Research and Development in Expert Systems, Proceedings of Expert Systems-86,3, Bramer, M.A. Ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, J.R. (1987), Simplifying decision trees. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, pp. 221–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon, W.D. and Banks, D. (1999), Combining classification trees using MLE. Statistics in Medicine, 18, pp. 727–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cappelli, C., Shannon, W.D. (2000). An MLE strategy for combining optimally pruned decision trees. In: Bethlehem, J.G., van der Heijden, P.G.M. (eds) COMPSTAT. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57678-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-57678-2_26

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1326-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-57678-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics