Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Methodenkritik am Kannheiser-Gutachten

  • Chapter
Cannabis, Straßenverkehr und Arbeitswelt

  • 386 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Eine Analyse des Gutachtens von Kannheiser manifestiert erhebliche methodische Schwächen, insbesondere einen kritikwürdigen Umgang mit den vorhandenen wissenschaftlichen Daten und Untersuchungen zum Thema, darunter falsche und selektive Wiedergabe von Studieninhalten, unlogische und durch das vorgelegte Studienmaterial nicht gedeckte Folgerungen sowie fehlerhafte quantitative Aussagen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Amen DG, Waugh M. High resolution brain SPECT imaging of marijuana smokers with AD/HD. J Psychoactive Drugs 1998;30(2):209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bührs R. Drogen — Entwicklungen — Trends. Analyse empirischer Daten von 781 suchtmittelabhängigen Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen. Sucht 1993;39(1):35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin AS, Post RD: Drug use and achievement. Int J Addict 1974;9(3):401–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chait LD, Fischman MW, Schuster CR. ‘Hangover’ effects the morning after marijuana smoking. Drag Alcohol Depend 1985;15(3):229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chait LD, Pierri JL. Acute and residual effects of alcohol and marijuana, alone and in combination, on mood and performance. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 1994;115(3):340–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesher G, Longo M. Cannabis und Alkohol bei Verkehrsunfällen. In: Grotenhermen F (Hrsg.): Cannabis und Cannabinoide. Pharmakologie, Toxikologie und therapeutisches Potential. Huber, Bern 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch DJ, Birky MM, Gust SW, Rollins DE, Walsh JM, Moulden JV, Quinlan KE, Beckel RW. The prevalence of drugs and alcohol in fatally injured truck drivers. J Forensic Sci 1993;38(6):1342–1353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DF. Lifetime prevalence of „amotivational syndrome“ among users and non-users of hashish. Psychol Addictive Behav 1987;1(2):114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elbert T, Rockstroh B. Psychopharmakologie. Anwendung und Wirkungsweisen von Psychopharmaka und Drogen. Hogrefe, Göttingen 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JM, Page JB, Francis DJ, Copeland K, Naus MJ, Davis CM, Morris R, Krauskopf D, Satz P. Cognitive correlates of long-term cannabis use in Costa Rican men. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53(11):1051–1057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gieringer D. Marijuana, Driving, and Accident Safety. J Psychoactive Drugs 1988;20(1):93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjerde H, Kinn G. Impairment in drivers due to cannabis in combination with other drugs. Forensic Sci Int 1991;50(1):57–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode E. Drug use and grades in college. Nature 1971;234(5326):225–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halikas JA, Weller RA, Morse C, Shapiro T. Incidence and characteristics of amotivational syndrome, including associated findings, among chronic marijuana users. In: National Institute on Drug Abuse. Marijuana and youth: Clinical observations on motivation and learning. NIDA, Rockville, Maryland 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall W, Room R, Bondy S. A Comparative Appraisal of the Health and Psychological Consequences of Alcohol, Cannabis, Nicotine and Opiate Use. Sydney and Toronto, 19. September 1994a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall W, Solowij N, Lemon J. The Health and Psychological Effects of Cannabis Use. National Drug Strategy Monograph No. 25. Australian Government Publication Service, Canberra 1994b.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall W, Room R, Bondy S. Comparing the Health and Psychological risks of alcohol, cannabis, nicotine and opiate use. In: Kalant H, Corrigan W, Hall W, Smart R, eds. The health effects of cannabis. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalant H, Corrigan W, Hall W, Smart R, eds. The health effects of cannabis. Toronto: Addiction Research Foundation, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannheiser W. Psychologisches Gutachten im Auftrag des Bayerischen Verwaltungsgerichtshofes zu den Einflüssen eines chronischen Cannabiskonsums auf die Fahreignung. Institut für Psychologie der Universität München, 26. März 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiber D, Soellner R, Tossmann P. Cannabiskonsum in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Entwicklungstendenzen, Konsummuster und Einflußfaktoren. Bundesministerium für Gesundheti Bonn, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krüger HP, Löbmann R. Auftreten und Risiken von Cannabis im Straßenverkehr. In: Berghaus G, Krüger HP. Cannabis im Straßenverkehr. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Longo MC, Hunter CE, Lokan RJ, White JM, White MA. The prevalence of alcohol, cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and stimulants amongst injured drivers and their role in driver culpability: part ii: the relationship between drug prevalence and drug concentration, and driver culpability. Accid Anal Prev 2000;32(5):623–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marowitz L. Drugs arrest and driving risk. Alcohol, Drugs and Driving 1995;11:1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew RJ, Wilson WH, Coleman RE, Turkington TG, DeGrado TR. Marijuana intoxication and brain activation in marijuana smokers. Life Sci 1997;60:2075–2089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullins CJ, Vitola BM, Abellera JW. Users of cannabis only. US AFHRL. Technical Report 1974;74:41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page JB, Fletcher J, True WR. Psychosociocultural perspectives on chronic cannabis use: the Costa Rican follow-up. J Psychoactive Drugs 1988;20(1):57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plasse T. Antiemetische Effekte der Cannabinoide. In: Grotenhermen F (Hrsg.): Cannabis und Cannabinoide. Pharmakologie, Toxikologie und therapeutisches Potential. Huber, Bern 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbe HWJ. Influence of marijuana on driving. Maastricht, Institut for Human Psychopharmacology, Universität Limburg 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley AM. Marijuana: on road and driving simulator studies. In: Kalant H, Corrigal W, Hall W, Smart R (eds.): The Health Effects of Cannabis. Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smiley AM, Noy YI, Tostowaryk W. The effects of marijuana, alone and in combination with alcohol, on driving an instrumented car. Proceedings of the 10* International Conference on Alcohol, Drugs, and Traffic Safety, Amsterdam 1986:203–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solowij N, Greyner BFS. Langzeiteffekte auf Psyche und Kognition In: Grotenhermen F (Hrsg.): Cannabis und Cannabinoide. Pharmakologie, Toxikologie und therapeutisches Potential. Huber, Bern 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solowij N, Michie PT, Fox AM. Differential impairments of selective attention due to frequency and duration of cannabis use. Biol Psychiatry 1995;37(10):731–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solowij N. Do cognitive impairments recover following cessation of cannabis use? Life Sci 1995;56(23-24):2119–2126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tunving K, Thulin SO, Risberg J, Warkentin S. Regional cerebral blood flow in long-term heavy cannabis use. Psychiatry Res 1986;17(1):15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization: Cannabis: a health perspective and research agenda. Geneva: WHO, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Franjo Grotenhermen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. nova-Institut, Goldenbergstraße 2, D-50354, Hürth

    Franjo Grotenhermen  & Michael Karus  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grotenhermen, F. (2002). Methodenkritik am Kannheiser-Gutachten. In: Grotenhermen, F., Karus, M. (eds) Cannabis, Straßenverkehr und Arbeitswelt. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56070-5_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56070-5_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42689-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56070-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation