Skip to main content

Clustering and Aggregation of Fuzzy Preference Data: Agreement vs. Information

  • Conference paper
New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis
  • 654 Accesses

Abstract

We are considering the application of the data analysis methods in the case of the model of group decision making in which n judges express their opinions as to m options in the form of pairwise preference coefficients d i kl ∈ [0,1], where i,iI = {1,…,n}, denotes a judge and k,l ∈ = {1,…, m} denote options considered. Hence, the coefficients must not necessarily belong to {0,1}, but may also correspond to less definite preferences. It is obvious that the need for allowing such “fuzzy” (or “valued”) preference coefficients to be elicitated arises when the options are perceived through a number of criteria on which they may score in a very different manner, and the elicitation of these scores by every judge for every criterion would be much too cumbersome, if at all possible (considering e.g. the problem of identification of all the—independent—criteria).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • REGNIER, S. (1965): Sur quelques aspects mathematiques des problemes de classification automatique. ICC Bulletin, 4, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAUL, W. and SCHADER, M. (1988): Clusterwise evaluation of paired comparisons. Paper for Fourth International Symposium on Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis: “The Ins and Outs of Solving real Problems”. Nancy, December 1988, INRIA, Le Chesnay.

    Google Scholar 

  • MARCOTORCHINO, J.-F. and MICHAUD, P. (1979): Optimisation en Analyse Ordinale des Donnees. Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OWSIŃSKI, J.W. and ZADROZŃY, S. (1986): Structuring a regional problem: aggregation and clustering in orderings. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 2, 1 & 2, 83–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OWSIŃSKI, J.W. (1990): On a new quick clustering method with a global objective function. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 6, 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OWSIŃSKI, J.W. and ZADROZŃY, S. (1990): The problem of clusterwise aggregation of preferences. In: R. Kulikowski and J. Stefanski (eds. Omnitech Press): Decision Making Models for Management and Manufacturing. Warszawa, 91–101.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1994 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Owsiński, J.W. (1994). Clustering and Aggregation of Fuzzy Preference Data: Agreement vs. Information. In: Diday, E., Lechevallier, Y., Schader, M., Bertrand, P., Burtschy, B. (eds) New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_55

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-51175-2_55

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-58425-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-51175-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics