Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper present the findings of post occupancy survey of Sophiatown residence; one of the residence and presently the largest residence in University of Johannesburg Auckland pack campus in Johannesburg, South Africa. The purpose of the paper is to evaluate the extent to which the building is satisfactory to the students. The data were collected during October and November 2012. The primary data for the study was collected through a structured questionnaire survey. A total of 150 questionnaires were distributed and 135 were received back from the occupants of the residence. The survey results revealed that a majority of the occupants (students) of the residence were satisfied with most qualities in the residence which makes the residence satisfactory to the students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abdulla RS (2009) A descriptive study on students’ satisfaction towards the services provided by Universiti Utara Malaysia. MIS thesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aigbavboa C, Thwala W (2012) An assessment of occupants’ expectation in the delivery of low-income housing in South Africa In: Smith SD (ed) Proceedings of 28th annual ARCOM conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, Edinburgh, UK, 3–5 September 2012, pp 295–304

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amerigo M, Aragones JI (1997) A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. J Environ Psychol 17:47–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Birt B, Newsham GR (2009) Post – occupancy evaluation of energy and indoor environment quality in green buildings. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on smart and sustainable built environments, Delft, The Netherlands, 15–19 June 2009, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  5. Blakstad SH, Olsson N, Hansen GK, Knudsen W (2010) Usability mapping tool. In: Paper presented in the 18th CIB world building congress in W098 and W111 special track, Salford, UK, May 2010

    Google Scholar 

  6. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rogers WJ (1976) The quality of the America life: perceptions, evaluations, and satisfaction. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandrasekar K (2011) Workplace environment and its impact on organisational performance in the public sector organisations. Int J Enterp Comput Bus Syst 1(1):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  8. Francescato GB (1998) Residential satisfaction. In: Van Vliet W (ed) The encyclopaedia of housing. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Francescato G, Weidemann S, Anderson J, Chenoweth R (1974) Evaluating residents’ satisfaction in housing for low and moderate income families: a multi-method approach. In: Carson DH (ed) Man-environment interactions: evaluation & applications, environmental design

    Google Scholar 

  10. Khalil N, Husin HN (2009) Post occupancy evaluation towards indoor environment improvement in Malaysia’s office buildings. J Sustain Develop 2(1):187–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kirk SJ, Stirrett CM (2011) Post – occupancy evaluation for added value at trail’s end. In: Lean construction institute of Michigan, Michigan State University, USA, pp 1–17

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kooymans R, Haylock P (2006) Post occupancy evaluation and workplace productivity. In: University of South Australia, Pacific real estate society, Auckland, New Zealand, 22 Jan 2006, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lane S, Kinsey J (1980) Housing tenure and housing satisfaction. J Consum Aff 14:341–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lansing J et al (1970) Planned residential environments. Institute for Social Research, Michigan

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lu M (1999) Determinants of residential satisfaction: ordered logit vs. regression models. Growth Change 30(Spring):264–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Michelson W (1977) Environment choice, human behaviour, and residential satisfaction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moser CA, Kalton G (1971) Survey methods in social investigation. Heinemann Educational, London

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nawawi AH, Khalil N (2008) Post-occupancy evaluation correlated with building occupants’: an approach to performance evaluation of government and public buildings. J Build Apprais 4(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ojasalo J (2001) Managing customer expectations in professional services. Manag Service Qual 11(3):200–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Onibokun AG (1974) Evaluating consumers’ satisfaction with housing: an application of a system approach. J Am Inst Plan 40(3):189–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pinder J, Price I, Wilkinson SJ, Demack S (2003) A method for evaluating workplace utility. Prop Manag 21(4):218–229

    Google Scholar 

  22. Varady D (1983) Determinates of residential mobility decisions. J Am Plann Assoc 49:184–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. O. Aigbavboa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aigbavboa, C.O., Thwala, W.D., Eke, C.C. (2014). An Evaluation of Students’ Satisfaction with University Hall of Residence. In: Yang, D., Qian, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-44916-1_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics