Abstract
Direct detection of low-frequency gravitational waves (\(10^{-9}-10^{-8}\) Hz) is the main goal of pulsar timing array (PTA) projects. One of the main targets for the PTAs is to measure the stochastic background of gravitational waves (GWB) whose characteristic strain is expected to approximately follow a power-law of the form \(h_c(f)=A (f/\hbox {yr}^{-1})^{\alpha }\), where \(f\) is the gravitational-wave frequency. In this chapter we use the current data from the European PTA to determine an upper limit on the GWB amplitude \(A\) as a function of the unknown spectral slope \(\alpha \) with a Bayesian inference method, by modelling the GWB as a random Gaussian process. For the case \(\alpha =-2/3\), which is expected if the GWB is produced by supermassive black-hole binaries, we obtain a 95% confidence upper limit on \(A\) of \(6\times 10^{-15}\), which is \(1.8\) times lower than the 95% confidence GWB limit obtained by the Parkes PTA in 2006. Our approach to the data analysis incorporates the multi-telescope nature of the European PTA and thus can serve as a useful template for future intercontinental PTA collaborations.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious.
It is the source of all true art and all science. He to whom this
emotion is a stranger, who can no longer pause to wonder and
stand rapt in awe, is as good as dead: his eyes are closed.
Albert Einstein.
This chapter is adapted from: R. van Haasteren et al. Placing limits on the stochastic gravitational-wave background using European Pulsar Timing Array data MNRAS (2011) 414(4): 3117-3128 By permission of Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The SRT is expected to become operational in 2011 (Tofani et al. 2008).
- 2.
Qualitatively, experienced observers are rightfully so very confident in their timing solutions. Quantitatively however, the only statistical tool currently available for observers to check whether the timing solution is reasonable is the reduced \(\chi ^2\) statistic. But since the error bars obtained with the cross-correlation technique cannot be fully trusted, the same holds for the \(\chi ^2\) statistic.
- 3.
We note that, although such a detection is consistent with a GWB, we would need more pulsars to exclude the possibility that some other effect is causing the correlated signal we detect here.
- 4.
The model for the GWB that Sesana et al. (2008) use is a broken power-law. Their \(h_{\text {1yr}}\) therefore has a slightly different meaning, and our quoted value should be taken as a crude approximation.
References
Anholm M., Ballmer S., Creighton J. D. E., Price L. R., Siemens X., 2009, Phys. Rev. D, 79, 8.
Begelman M. C., Blandford R. D., Rees M. J., 1980, Nature, 287, 307.
Cordes J. M., Shannon R. M., 2010, e-print arXiv:1010:3785v1.
Damour T., Vilenkin A., 2005, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 063510.
Demorest P. B., 2007, PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Detweiler S., 1979, ApJ, 234, 1100.
Estabrook F., Wahlquist H., 1975, Gen. Relativ. Gravitaion, 6, 439.
Ferdman R. D., van Haasteren R., Bassa C. G., Burgay M., Cognard I., Corongiu A., D’Amico N., Desvignes G., Hessels J. W. T., Janssen G. H., Sanidas S., Smits R., Theureau G., 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 084014.
Foster R., Backer D., 1990, ApJ, 361, 300.
Grishchuk L. P., 2005, Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, 48, 1235.
Hellings R., Downs G., 1983, ApJ, 265, L39.
Hobbs G. B., Edwards R. T., 2006, TEMPO2 user manual, Version 2.0.
Hobbs G. B., Edwards R. T., Manchester R. N., 2006, MNRAS, 369, 655.
Hobbs G. B., Bailes M., Bhat N. D. R., Burke-Spolaor S., Champion D. J., Coles W., Hotan A., Jenet F., et al. 2009, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 26, 103.
Hobbs, G. B. et al., 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 084013.
Jaffe A., Backer D., 2003, ApJ, 583, 616.
Janssen G. H., 2009, PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam.
Jenet F., Hobbs G., Lee K., Manchester R., 2005, ApJ, 625, L123.
Jenet F., Hobbs G., van Straten W., Manchester R., Bailes M., Verbiest J., Edwards R., Hotan A., Sarkissian J., Ord S., 2006, ApJ, 653, 1571.
Jenet F. et al., 2009, eprint arXiv:0909.1058v1.
Kaspi V. M., Taylor J. H., Ryba M. F., 1994, ApJ, 428, 713.
Lazaridis K., Wex N., Jessner A., Kramer M., Stappers B. W., Janssen G. H., Desvignes G., Purver M. B., Cognard I., Theureau G., Lyne A. G., Jordan C. A., Zensus J. A., 2009, MNRAS, 400, 805.
Lommen A. N., 2002, in WE-Heraeus Seminar on Neutron Stars, Pulsars, and Supernova Remnants, ed. W. Becker, H. Lesch, & J. Trumper (Garching: MPE ), 114.
Maggiore M., 2000, Phys. Rep., 331, 283.
McHugh M. P., Zalamansky G., Vernotte F., Lantz E., 1996, Phys. Rev. D, 54, 5993.
Ölmez S., Mandic V., Siemens X., 2010, Phys. Rev. D, 81, 104028.
Phinney E. S., 2001, eprint arXiv:astro-ph/0108028v1.
Sazhin M. V., 1978, Soviet Astronomy, 22, 36.
Sesana A., Vecchio A., Colacino C. N., 2008, MNRAS, 390, 192.
Splaver E. M., Nice D. J., Stairs I. H., Lommen A. N., Backer D. D., 2005, ApJ, 620, 405–415.
Stinebring D. R., Ryba M. F., Taylor J. H., Romani R. W., 1990, Phys. Rev. D, 65, 285–288.
Taylor J. H., 1992, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 341, 117–134 (1992), 341, 117.
Tofani G. et al., 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 7012 of Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Status of the Sardinia Radio Telescope project.
van Haasteren R., Levin Y., McDonald P., Lu T., 2009, MNRAS, 395, 1005.
van Haasteren R., Levin Y., Janssen G. H., Lazaridis K., Kramer M., Stappers B. W., Desvignes G., Purver M. B., Lyne A. G., 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3117.
Verbiest J. P. W., Bailes M., Bhat N. D. R., Burke-Spolaor S., Champion D. J., Coles W., Hobbs G. B., Hotan A., et al. 2010, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 27, 084015.
Vilenkin A., 1981, Physics Letters B, 107, 47.
Wyithe J., Loeb A., 2003, ApJ, 595, 614.
Yardley D. R. B., Coles W. A., Hobbs G. B., Verbiest J. P. W., Manchester R. N., van Straten W., Jenet F. A., Bailes M., Bhat N. D. R., Burke-Spolaor S., Champion D. J., Hotan A. W., Oslowski S., Reynolds J. E., Sarkissian J. M., 2011, MNRAS, pp 491-+.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Haasteren, R. (2014). Placing Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background Using European Pulsar Timing Array Data. In: Gravitational Wave Detection and Data Analysis for Pulsar Timing Arrays. Springer Theses. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39599-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39599-4_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39598-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39599-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)