Abstract
Cardiovascular treatments are based on complex decision making process requiring broad knowledge base spanning the fields of cardiology and heart surgery. While early on in 1970th and 1980th cardiologists and surgeons participated in decision making process later on rather competitive attitudes were adopted and independent decisions by either specialty prevailed. Recently, based on evidence suggesting significant differences in outcome with different modalities of treatment (surgery vs. intervention vs. conservative management) in different groups of patients the critical importance of interdisciplinary exchange and collaboration has been highlighted and team decisions preferred as means to improve the quality of cardiovascular treatments. The chapter reviews some of the key aspects of working of specialists together in a heart team scenario.
Abbreviations
- Cognitive skills:
-
In context with revascularization therapies ability of the operator to perceive relevant data, to pass appropriate judgment and to determine the course of action.
- Decision making:
-
The highest level of cognitive skills. Ability of the operator to decide on optimum strategy based on case specific data.
- FAME:
-
Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding PCI in patients with multivessel evaluation trial comparing revascularization strategies guided by fractional flow reserve versus angiography.
- Heart team:
-
Team of cardiovascular specialists providing cardiovascular treatments based on interdisciplinary consensus regarding the optimum choice of treatment. Typically, team members include cardiac surgeon, interventionist and conventional cardiologist.
- SYNTAX:
-
Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXUS and cardiac surgery trial comparing interventional and surgical revascularization strategies in patients with complex multi-vessel disease.
- Teamwork:
-
Interactive transfer of knowledge by specialists with complementary expertise.
References
Bhatti F, Grayson AD, Grotte G, Fabri BM, Au J et al (2006) The logistic EuroSCORE in cardiac surgery: how well does it predict operative risk? Heart 92(12):1817–1820
De Maria R, Mazzoni M, Parolini M, Gregori D, Bortone F et al (2005) Predictive value of EuroSCORE on long term outcome in cardiac surgery patients: a single institution study. Heart 91(6):779–784
Garg S, Stone GW, Kappetein AP, Sabik JF 3rd, Simonton C et al (2010a) Clinical and angiographic risk assessment in patients with left main stem lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3(9):891–901
Garg S, Sarno G, Garcia-Garcia HM, Girasis C, Wykrzykowska J, Dawkins KD, Serruys PW, on behalf of the ARTS-II Investigators (2010b) A new tool for the risk stratification of patients with complex coronary artery disease. The clinical SYNTAX score. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 3:317–326
Hillis LD, Smith PK, Anderson JL, Bittl JA, Bridges CR et al (2011) ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American college of cardiology foundation/American heart association task force on practice guidelines. Circulation 124(23):e652–e735
Kappetein AP, Feldman TE, Mack MJ, Morice MC, Holmes DR et al (2011) Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with drug-eluting stenting for the treatment of left main and/or three-vessel disease: 3-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. Eur Heart J 32(17):2125–2134
Kim YH, Ahn JM, Park DW, Lee BK, Lee CW et al (2006) EuroSCORE as a predictor of death and myocardial infarction after unprotected left main coronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 98(12):1567–1570
Kolh P, Wijns W, Danchin N, Di Mario C, Falk V et al (2010) Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 38(Suppl):S1–S52
Lanzer P (2013) Cognitive and decision-making skills in catheter-based cardiovascular interventions. In: Lanzer P (ed) Catheter-based cardiovascular interventions; knowledge-based approach. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113–156
Lemesle G, Bonello L, de Labriolle A, Steinberg DH, Roy P et al (2009) Prognostic value of the syntax score in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting for three-vessel coronary artery disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73(5):612–617
Nashef SA, Roques F, Michel P, Gauducheau E, Lemeshow S et al (1999) European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (EuroSCORE). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 16(1):9–13
Nilsson J, Algotsson L, Hoglund P, Luhrs C, Brandt J (2006) Comparison of 19 pre-operative risk stratification models in open-heart surgery. Eur Heart J 27(7):867–874
Peterson M (2009) An introduction to decision theory. Cambrige University Press, Cambridge
Pijls NH, Fearon WF, Tonino PA, Siebert U, Ikeno F et al (2010) Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56(3):177–184
Ranucci M, Castelvecchio S, Menicanti L, Frigiola A, Pelissero G (2009) Risk of assessing mortality risk in elective cardiac operations: age, creatinine, ejection fraction, and the law of parsimony. Circulation 119(24):3053–3061
Reyna FR (2008) Theories of medical decision making and health: an evidence-based approach. Med Dec Making 26:829–832
Romagnoli E, Burzotta F, Trani C, Siviglia M, Biondi-Zoccai GG et al (2009) EuroSCORE as predictor of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Heart 95(1):43–48
Roques F, Michel P, Goldstone AR, Nashef SA (2003) The logistic EuroSCORE. Eur Heart J 24(9):881–882
Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Sarno G, van den Brand M et al (2009a) Assessment of the SYNTAX score in the syntax study. EuroIntervention 5(1):50–56
Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP, Colombo A, Holmes DR et al (2009b) Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 360(10):961–972
Serruys PW, Onuma Y, Garg S, Vranckx P, De Bruyne B, Morice M-C, Colombo A, Macaya C, Richardt G, Fajadet J, Hamm C, Schuijer M, Rademaker T, Wittebols K, Stoll H-P on behalf of the ARTS II Investigators (2010) 5-year clinical outcomes of the ARTS II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study II) of the sirolimus-eluting stent in the treatment of patients with multivessel de novo coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1093–1101
Shahian DM, O’Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK et al (2009) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1 - coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 88(Suppl 1):S2–S22
Shroyer AL, Coombs LP, Peterson ED, Eiken MC, DeLong ER et al (2003) The Society of Thoracic Surgeons: 30-day operative mortality and morbidity risk models. Ann Thorac Surg 75(6):1856–1864, discussion 1864–1855
Sianos G, Morel MA, Kappetein AP, Morice MC, Colombo A et al (2005) The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1(2):219–227
Tonino PA, Fearon WF, De Bruyne B, Oldroyd KG, Leesar MA et al (2010) Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation. J Am Coll Cardiol 55(25):2816–2821
Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, DeRose JJ, Swistel DG (2004) European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation predicts long-term survival in patients with coronary artery bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 25(1):51–58
Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Swistel DG, DeRose JJ Jr (2005) Does EuroSCORE predict length of stay and specific postoperative complications after cardiac surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 27(1):128–133
Valgimigli M, Serruys PW, Tsuchida K, Vaina S, Morel MA et al (2007) Cyphering the complexity of coronary artery disease using the syntax score to predict clinical outcome in patients with three-vessel lumen obstruction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 99(8):1072–1081
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this entry
Cite this entry
Folliguet, T., Al-Attar, N. (2014). Implementing the Heart Team Approach for Optimal Strategy in Myocardial Revascularization and Structural Valve Disease. In: Lanzer, P. (eds) PanVascular Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37393-0_256-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37393-0_256-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37393-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine