Skip to main content

Degenerative Knee Assessment: Physical Examination and Outcome

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Sports Injuries

Abstract

With increasing life expectancy and advances in medicine, degenerative disease of the knee now occurs in patients with higher activity levels and functional expectations. Providing appropriate treatment for these patients depends on an accurate assessment to gather not only clinical information but also functional , psychosocial, and cultural factors that are essential for therapeutic decision. This patient’s evaluation requires a rigorous clinical examination, complementary examinations, and the use of assessment scores .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ACL:

Anterior cruciate ligament

HKA:

Hip knee ankle

HSS:

Hospital for Special Surgery

IKS:

International Knee Society

KOOS:

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

WOMAC:

Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index

References

  • Acquadro C, Berzon R, Dubois D, Leidy NK, Marquis P, Revicki D (2003) Incorporating the patient’s perspective into drug development and communication: an ad hoc task force report of the Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO). Harmonization Group meeting at the Food and Drug Administration. Value Health 6(5):522–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthritis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn Suppl 277:7–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann R, Asch E, Bloch D, Bole G, Borenstein D, Brandt K et al (1986) Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 29:1039–1049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaton D, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz M (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 15:3186–3191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies AP (2002) Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 9:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A (1998) Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 80:63–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dejour H (1991) Classification des gonarthroses. Septièmesjournéeslyonnaises de chirurgie dugenou

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop 248:9–12

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fermanian J (2005) Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined? Ann Readapt Med Phys 48:281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Flandry F, Hunt JP, Terry GC, Hughston JC (1991) Analysis of subjective knee complaints using visual analog scales. Am J Sports Med 19:112–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gandhi R, Davey JR, Mahomed NN (2008) Predicting patient dissatisfaction following joint replacement surgery. J Rheumatol 35:2415–2418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Ranawat CS, Aglietti P, Shine J (1976) A comparison of four models of total knee replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58(6):754–765

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN (1989) Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marx RG (2003) Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy 19:1103–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noble PC, Scuderi GR, Brekke AC, Sikorskii A, Benjamin JB, Lonner JH et al (2012) Development of a New Knee Society Scoring System. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470(1):20–32

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS). Development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verdonk PC, Pernin J, Pinaroli A, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P (2009) Soft tissue balancing in varus total knee arthroplasty: an algorithmic approach. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17(6):660–666

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ware J et al (1996) A 12 item short form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse SL, Lingard EA, Katz JN, Learmonth ID (2003) Development and testing of a reduced WOMAC function scale. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85B(5):706–711

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke RJ, Burke LB, Erickson P (2004) Measuring treatment impact: a review of patient-reported outcomes and other efficacy endpoints in approved product labels. Control Clin Trials 25(6):535–552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caroline Debette .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this entry

Cite this entry

Debette, C., Neyret, P., Magnussen, R.A., Servien, E., Lustig, S. (2014). Degenerative Knee Assessment: Physical Examination and Outcome. In: Doral, M., Karlsson, J. (eds) Sports Injuries. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36801-1_189-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36801-1_189-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36801-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics