Abstract
BPMN 2.0 is a standard for business processes modeling. Besides praise for this notation, there is definitely some criticism. With a practical case study it is analyzed whether positive and negative associations with BPMN play a role in actual practical use. With the help of a group of students a practical case study is carried out, analyzing various BPMN products.
This paper summarizes the results and findings from this case study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Handy, B., Dirndorfer, M., Schneeberger, J., Fischer, H.: Methods of Process Modeling in the Context of Civil Services by the Example of German Notaries. In: Schmidt, W. (ed.) S-BPM ONE 2011. CCIS, vol. 213, pp. 281–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Börger, E.: Approaches to modeling business processes: a critical analysis of BPMN, workflow patterns and YAWL. Software and Systems Modeling 11, 305–318 (2012)
OMG ed: Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0 (2011)
Sneed, S.: Mapping Possibilities of S-BPM and BPMN 2.0. In: Oppl, S., Fleischmann, A. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2012. CCIS, vol. 284, pp. 91–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dirndorfer, M., Fischer, H., Sneed, S. (2013). Case Study on the Interoperability of Business Process Management Software. In: Fischer, H., Schneeberger, J. (eds) S-BPM ONE - Running Processes. S-BPM ONE 2013. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 360. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36754-0_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36753-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36754-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)