Skip to main content

Problems and Solutions in Tomographic Analysis of Phase Biological Objects

  • Conference paper
Fringe 2013

Introduction

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM), when applied to semitransparent samples such as living cells, provides accurate measurements of phase shift resulting from a mean refractive index accumulated over the cellular thickness [1-5]. However a single shot holography is inadequate to provide true 3D reconstruction of a cell structure although such reconstruction is required to solve several hot biomedical topics including: label-free analysis of living cells and tissues, characterization of physical processes in cellular biophysics, extended studies in vascular and tumor biology, as well as recognition and monitoring of bacteria colonies. It has been proved by many groups that the solution can be provided by combining digital holography with tomographic techniques. The resultant method, often referred as optical diffraction tomography (ODT) [6-9] requires multiple complex object field captured for different illumination directions with respect to the sample and latter tomographic reconstructing of a three-dimensional distribution of refractive index. The projections are obtained through varying the illumination direction or rotating the specimen. Number of various approaches has been so far reported to deal with this problem including trapping a specimen with micropipette [10] or optical tweezers [11] or altering the angle of illumination using a galvanometer scanning mirror [12] and multiple fibre optics illumination [13]. In this study we present a cost-efficient, sample-rotational-based tomography module for 3D label-free quantitative live cell measurements based on a hollow optical fiber as the sample cuvette. Several problems connected with implementation of the full tomographic reconstruction process are discussed including tracking of a cell position, minimizing errors associated with a fluid field fiber capillary of a sample cuvette, determination of absolute values of refractive index and the possibility of reconstruction from a limited angle of projections. We also show the examples of exciting results which can be obtained with this tool.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cuche, E., Bevilacqua, F., Depeursinge, C.: Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging. Optics Letters 24, 291–293 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lue, N., et al.: Quantitative phase imaging of live cells using fast Fourier phase microscopy. Applied Optics 46(10), 1836–1842 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, F., et al.: Digital holographic microscopy for the three-dimensional dynamic analysis of in vitro cancer cell migration. J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 054032 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kemper, B., et al.: Investigation of living pancreas tumor cells by digital holographic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 11, 034005 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marquet, P., et al.: Digital holographic microscopy: A noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Optics Letters 30, 468–470 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charrière, F., et al.: Cell refractive index tomography by digital holographic microscopy. Optics Letters 31, 178–180 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Debailleul, M., et al.: High-resolution three-dimensional tomographic diffractive microscopy of transparent inorganic and biological samples. Optics Letters 34, 79–81 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sung, Y., et al.: Optical diffraction tomography for high resolution live cell imaging. Optics Express 17, 266–277 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kozacki, T., Kujawińska, M., Kniażewski, P.: Investigation of limitations of optical diffraction tomography. Opto-Electronics Review 15(2), 102–109 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Charrière, F., et al.: Living specimen tomography by digital holographic microscopy: morphometry of testate amoeba. Optics Express 14, 7005–7013 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dholakia, K., Reece, P.: Optical micromanipulation takes hold. Nano Today 1(1), 18–27 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choi, W., et al.: Field-based angle-resolved light-scattering study of single live cells. Optics Letters 33, 1596–1598 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isikman, S., et al.: Lens-free optical tomographic microscope with a large imaging volume on a chip. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(18), 7296–7301 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kemper, B., et al.: Simplified approach for quantitative digital holographic phase contrast imaging of living cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 16, 026014 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Natterer, F.: The mathematics of computerized tomography. Wiley, New York (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kostencka, J., et al.: Holographic method for capillary induced aberration compensation for 3D tomographic measurements of living cells. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 8792 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Verhoeven, D.: Limited-data computed tomography algorithms for the physical sciences. Applied Optics 32(20), 3736–3754 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tam, K., Perez-Mendez, V.: Tomographical imaging with limited-angle input. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 71(5), 582 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Fessler, J.: Iterative tomographic image reconstruction using nonuniform fast Fourier transforms. Commun. Signal Process. Lab., Dept. Elect. Eng. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Likhachov, A.: Projection data replenishment algorithm for limited angle tomography. Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing 45(1), 55–61 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Malgorzata Kujawinska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kujawinska, M. et al. (2014). Problems and Solutions in Tomographic Analysis of Phase Biological Objects. In: Osten, W. (eds) Fringe 2013. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36359-7_124

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36359-7_124

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36358-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36359-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics